"The War In Medicine"
Continued from last post.But now let's us look at it this way. There has never, ever,
been a drug company that submitted a cancer drug to the FDA
that had even 1,000th the statistical evidence (to extend
life compared to no treatment) to support that drug, than
the scientific evidence for alternative treatments for cancer.
The statistics they use are full of deception. Drugs are
approved on the basis of their ability to shrink tumors and
by comparing one toxic poison to another toxic poison,
things which have absolutely nothing to do with proving an
extension of life or improving life.
If you compared the valid scientific evidence for orthodox
treatments for cancer versus the valid scientific evidence
for alternative treatments for cancer (using valid cure
rates, not tumor shrinkage), the overwhelming, gigantic,
colossal scientific evidence favors the alternative treatment
The "cure rates" for orthodox medicine are high only because
of deception. They evaluate the patients five years after
diagnosis, not until they die. They ignore patients who die
of chemotherapy related illness. Etc. The "cure rates" for
some of Dr. Binzel's patients were determined 18 years after
treatment! He did not use the orthodox definition of "cure."
It is the most important job of the FDA, NIH and NCI (important
defined by their masters in the pharmaceutical industry), to make
sure there is "no scientific evidence" for alternative treatments.
But there is scientific evidence. The scientific evidence for
alternative treatments can be compared to a ship the size of the
Queen Mary II. The scientific evidence for orthodox treatments,
by comparison, would be compared to a ship that could fit in a
bathtub. I am not exaggerating. Yet the FDA says chemotherapy
and orthodox medicine "has" scientific evidence and there is "no
scientific evidence" for alternative treatments. It is nothing but pure
corruption, it is nothing but lies.
How Can I Solve My Problem?
Post a Comment