Friday, May 9, 2014

The Potent Antioxidant That Few Know About

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.




      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE

     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments

      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 

Grounding: The Potent Antioxidant That Few Know About... And
It's Free

By Dr. Mercola

    While still in the vast minority, an increasing number of
people are joining the barefoot running trend, throwing their
shoes to the wind and letting their feet run free, literally.

    In the modern world, it might sound "extreme" to give up
your shoes, particularly when engaging in an activity as hard
on your feet as running, but surrounding your feet with thick
cushioning and stiff supports is actually the "new" trend,
evolutionarily speaking.

Humans Went Without Running Shoes for Millions of Years

    Writing in the journal Nature, Harvard researchers

        "Humans have engaged in endurance running for
millions of years, but the modern running shoe was not
invented until the 1970s. For most of human evolutionary
history, runners were either barefoot or wore minimal
footwear such as sandals or moccasins with smaller heels
and little cushioning relative to modern running shoes."

    Let's face it, your feet were designed to work without
shoes. And while running barefoot does pose certain unique
hazards, such as stepping on a sharp object or injuring your
skin on abrasive pavement, there are reports that barefoot
running is actually quite beneficial.

    While the research is still limited and many of the
reports anecdotal, running barefoot may actually decrease
thelikelihood of ankle sprains and chronic injuries.

Shoes Alter Your Gait, but is This Good or Bad?

    Walking or running with shoes is quite a different
experience than doing so without them. This is evidenced
perhaps no more clearly than among children, who in the
developed world are virtually the only ones who have not yet
grown accustomed to wearing shoes, and as such their gait
should be more or less the way nature intended.

    Indeed, research published in the Journal of Foot and
Ankle Research revealed

        "Shoes affect the gait of children. With shoes,
children walk faster by taking longer steps with greater
ankle and knee motion and increased tibialis anterior
activity. Shoes reduce foot motion and increase the support
phases of the gait cycle.

        During running, shoes reduce swing phase leg speed,
attenuate some shock and encourage a rearfoot strike pattern.

The long-term effect of these changes on growth and
development are currently unknown.

    And therein lies the question: is footwear a boon or a
bust to mankind? Surprising as it may sound, emerging
research suggests modern running shoes, with their heavily
cushioned, elevated heels, may actually encourage runners to
strike the ground with their heel first,

    A move that generates a greater collision force with the
ground, leading to an increased potential for injury. The
Harvard researchers continued in Nature

        "Here we show that habitually barefoot endurance
runners often land on the fore-foot (fore-foot strike) before
bringing down the heel, but they sometimes land with a flat
foot (mid-foot strike) or, less often, on the heel (rear-foot
strike). In contrast, habitually shod runners mostly rear-
foot strike, facilitated by the elevated and cushioned heel
of the modern running shoe.

        Kinematic and kinetic analyses show that even on hard
surfaces, barefoot runners who fore-foot strike generate
smaller collision forces than shod rear-foot strikers.

        This difference results primarily from a more
plantarflexed foot at landing and more ankle compliance
during impact, decreasing the effective mass of the body that
collides with the ground. Fore-foot- and mid-foot-strike
gaits were probably more common when humans ran barefoot
or in minimal shoes, and may protect the feet and lower limbs
from some of the impact-related injuries now experienced by a
high percentage of runners.

    This may explain how marathon runners in Kenya are able
to run great distances barefoot with virtually no pain or
injuries. Likewise, research reviewed by Michael Warburton, a
physical therapist in Australia, revealed

        Running-related chronic injuries to bone and
connective tissue in the legs are rare in developing
countries, where most people are habitually barefooted

        Where barefoot and shod populations co-exist, as in
Haiti, injury rates of the lower extremity are substantially
higher in the shod population

        Wearing footwear actually increases the likelihood of
ankle sprains, one of the most common sports injuries,
because it either decreases your awareness of foot position
or increases the twisting torque on your ankle during a

        One of the most common chronic injuries in runners,
planter fasciitis (an inflammation of the ligament running
along the sole of your foot), is rare in barefoot populations

        Running in bare feet reduces oxygen consumption by a
few percent

Grounding: The Overlooked Benefit of Going Barefoot

    While much of the debate between the barefoot and the
shoed-foot focuses on the potential for injury, another often
overlooked aspect is grounding. The technique of grounding,
also known as earthing, is simple: you walk barefoot to
"ground" with the Earth. The scientific theory behind the
health benefits seen from this simple practice is that your
body absorbs negative electrons from the Earth through the
soles of your feet.

    The Earth is negatively charged, so when you ground,
you're connecting your body to a negatively charged supply
of energy. And since the Earth has a greater negative charge
than your body, you end up absorbing electrons from it. The
grounding effect is, in my understanding, one of the most
potent antioxidants we know of and may have an anti-
inflammatory effect on your body. As written in the Journal
of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

        "It is well established, though not widely known,
that the surface of the earth possesses a limitless and
continuously renewed supply of free or mobile electrons as
a consequence of a global atmospheric electron circuit.
Wearing shoes with insulating soles and/or sleeping in beds
that are isolated from the electrical ground plane of the earth
have disconnected most people from the earth's electrical
rhythms and free electrons.

        A previous study demonstrated that connecting the
human body to the earth during sleep (earthing) normalizes
the daily cortisol rhythm and improves sleep. A variety of
other benefits were reported, including reductions in pain
and inflammation. Subsequent studies have confirmed these
earlier findings and documented virtually immediate
physiologic and clinical effects of grounding or earthing the

    Unfortunately, few people ever walk barefoot anymore to
experience the benefits of grounding. But it is very
plausible that some of the people who have converted to
barefoot running are experiencing benefits not only from the
lack of shoes, but also from the increased connection to the

Walking Barefoot Is a Valuable Aspect of a Healthy Lifestyle

    Exercising barefoot outdoors is one of the most wonderful,
inexpensive and powerful ways of incorporating Earthing into
your daily life and will also help speed up tissue repair, as well
as easing the muscle pain you sometimes get from strenuous
exercise. A review of the available research, published January
2012 in the Journal of Environmental and Public Health, agrees
with the concept of reaping health benefits when connecting to
the earth.

According to the authors

    Mounting evidence suggests that the Earth's negative
potential can create a stable internal bioelectrical
environment for the normal functioning of all body systems.
Moreover, oscillations of the intensity of the Earth's
potential may be important for setting the biological clocks
regulating diurnal body rhythms, such as cortisol secretion.

    It is also well established that electrons from
antioxidant molecules neutralize reactive oxygen species
(ROS, or in popular terms, free radicals) involved in the
body's immune and inflammatory responses. The National
Library of Medicine's online resource PubMed lists 7021
studies and 522 review articles from a search of antioxidant
+ electron + free radical. It is assumed that the influx of
free electrons absorbed into the body through direct contact
with the Earth likely neutralize ROS and thereby reduce acute
and chronic inflammation.

        Throughout history, humans mostly walked barefoot or
with footwear made of animal skins. They slept on the ground
or on skins. Through direct contact or through perspiration-
moistened animal skins used as footwear or sleeping mats, the
ground's abundant free electrons were able to enter the body,
which is electrically conductive. Through this mechanism,
every part of the body could equilibrate with the electrical
potential of the Earth, thereby stabilizing the electrical
environment of all organs, tissues, and cells.

        Modern lifestyle has increasingly separated humans
from the primordial flow of Earth's electrons. For example,
since the 1960s, we have increasingly worn insulating rubber
or plastic soled shoes, instead of the traditional leather
fashioned from hides. Rossi has lamented that the use of
insulating materials in post-World War II shoes has separated
us from the Earth's energy field. Obviously, we no longer
sleep on the ground as we did in times past.

        During recent decades, chronic illness, immune
disorders, and inflammatory diseases have increased
dramatically, and some researchers have cited environmental
factors as the cause. However, the possibility of modern
disconnection with the Earth's surface as a cause has not
been considered. Much of the research reviewed in this paper
points in that direction."

    When indoors, using a grounding pad or sheet is an
excellent way to lower your risk for cardiovascular disease
and other problems, such as carpal tunnel syndrome and

Before You Take Off Your Shoes

    Just taking off your shoes, if you've been wearing them
all your life, does not mean you'll immediately attain proper
barefoot running form. Many new barefoot runners continue to
land heavily on their heels -- and the result can be injury.
So if you decide to give barefoot running a try, make sure
you do it slowly, progressing gradually to more and more time
spent without shoes. A good starting point is to first try
walking barefoot and then begin with quarter-mile barefoot

    Keep in mind also that your gait will be different than
it is with your shoes on -- this is expected. Listen to your
body and try to tune in to your innate knowledge of how to
run and walk barefoot, and allow your feet, ankles, knees and
hips to naturally change position in response to the terrain.

    When you start going barefoot it is best to initiate on
naturally softer ground like grass, dirt paths and sand, not
cement, asphalt or hardwood. When the muscles and joints of
your foot become more stable and the skin on the bottom of
your feet thickens, you will be able to handle progressively
more time barefoot and on a wider variety of surfaces.

    While there are a growing number of minimalist footwear
options now on the market that are designed to simulate
barefoot running, some argue that these shoes are merely
marketing ploys, and in fact still change your gait from the
way nature intended. Personally, I have tried one version
that I liked very much and would recommend highly, although
since I traded in running for Peak Fitness, I haven't
actually used them for runs.

    One final note, barefoot running or walking doesn't have
to be an "all or nothing" decision. You can incorporate as
much barefoot time into your life as you feel comfortable
with. Quite possibly, you'll enjoy it so much that you will
naturally find yourself kicking off your shoes as much as

Thank You  Dr. Mercola       

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Those Who DO Have Cancer

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.




      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE

     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments

      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 

         Continued From 5/5/14

Especially For Those Who DO Have Cancer

If you have recently been diagnosed with cancer you have a
decision to make. Should you go with orthodox treatments
first and then go with alternative treatments after the orthodox
medicine people have sent you home to die? Or should
you go with alternative treatments first?

If it sounds like a tough decision then you had better read
this report another two or three times.

Is there a risk of going with alternative medicine first? I
can think of only one possible situation where it might be a
risk. If the cancer is totally contained to one place of the
body, and is getting ready to spread throughout the body, but
has not yet spread. Then surgery might be acceptable.

However, I doubt, in all sincerity, that your doctors really
know it has not already spread. By the time you have
symptoms, the cancer has been in your body for several years.
Modern medicine has no clue where all of the cancer cells are
in your body. In many cases I truly believe they say that it
is contained just to get your business, when in fact they
know that they don’t know if it has already spread (or it may
have come from somewhere else to begin with).

Cancer is generally caused by a combination of two things.

First, a poor diet. Second, a carcinogen. In other words, a
person has a poor diet, the body fills with fungus, then a
carcinogen is introduced into the body and the person gets
cancer, generally because of the fungus. Thus, by cutting out
the cancer the cause of the cancer has not been fixed. There
is nothing about orthodox medicine that deals with the true
cause of cancer. As Dr. Day has asked: Is cancer caused by a
deficiency of chemotherapy?

Let me suggest you go with alternative cancer treatments

Is there a risk in having your immune system built up?

Is there a risk in treating your liver with natural
substances that cleanse it? Is there a risk in selectively
killing cancer cells with substances God himself designed?
Is there a risk in dealing with the cause of your cancer?

More importantly, is there a risk in avoiding surgery (in
rare cases surgery is necessary)? Is there a risk in avoiding
chemotherapy, which destroys your immune system plus it
destroys red blood cells? Is there a risk in avoiding
radiation therapy which burns many of your healthy cells to

I suppose there is a risk going with alternative medicine
first. The level of risk is largely dependent on how much
homework you do.

Now the bad news. Most people who seek out alternative cancer
treatments have already been sent home to die and they feel
they “have nothing to lose by going with alternative medicine.

The reality is that several alternative cancer treatments have
been demonstrated to cure over 90% of the cancer patients
who use this treatment first. However, for people who go to
orthodox medicine first, and are eventually sent home to die, I
have never seen a cure rate for an alternative cancer treatment
that was over 50%.

Do the math. If you go with orthodox medicine first (cure
rate of 3%), and THEN go with alternative cancer treatments,
even if you use the best and strongest alternative treatment
there is, your chances of surviving your cancer is cut in half!!

There are several problems for people who have been sent home
to die. First, their body, and especially their major organs, have
been severely damaged and frequently these organs cannot
be repaired, especially the liver. Second, their immune system
has been destroyed before they were sent home to die.

Third, they have lost months or years of time while waiting
for orthodox medicine to send them home to die, time that is
not available for alternative treatments to work.

The truth is that even if there was an alternative cancer
treatment that safely removed every cancer cell from a
patient’s body within a few days (this type of treatment, by
the way, is theoretically safe and possible), many of those
sent home to die would die (even after this hypothetical
treatment) because of the long-term damage done by
orthodox medicine.

The last problem is that some of the most potent alternative
treatments (that can cure many of the cancer patients sent
home to die) work by killing cancer cells. These treatments
must be done slowly in order to avoid too many toxins being
released by dying and dead cancer cells. Thus, additional
time will be lost during the treatment.

Do You Know Someone With Cancer?

Many of the people who read this eBook are trying to decide
whether to tell someone they know, who has cancer, about
this web site. It is a far easier decision than you think. Don’t
make their decisions for them!!!! Tell them about this
website and let them decide what to do about it!

I know you love the person and want what is best for them.
That is good, but a person with cancer has a right to know
their options and to make their own decisions. It is their
life at stake, let them make the hard decisions. It is the
person with cancer who needs to know their options.

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights


 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Monday, May 5, 2014

Cancer Decisions...Treatments!


      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE

     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments

      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 

A Timeline

Let us draw a timeline in our minds. At the beginning of this timeline is the date a person is diagnosed with cancer. At the end of this timeline is when this person reaches an age of 100 years.

Let us put a single mark on this timeline. That mark is where this patient would have died if they had refused all types of medical treatment for their cancer. Let us say they did absolutely nothing to change their diet or treat their cancer with either orthodox or alternative cancer treatments. We will call this mark the baseline. It is the line where a person who refuses any and all treatments would die.

The scientific data is clear  the vast majority of orthodox cancer patients will die to the left of their baseline or on top of their baseline!!

Chemotherapy is 70 year old technology. It never worked, it will never work because, as Dr. Binzel stated, it treats the wrong thing. Modern cancer research is still not aimed at treating the right thing. Radiation therapy is even older than chemotherapy and surgery is even older than radiation.

What about alternative treatments? Alternative treatments do no harm to the patient. Thus, because alternative treatments build the immune system and selectively kill cancer cells, it is clear that it is impossible for alternative treatments to land a patient to the left of their baseline!! Alternative treatments treat the right thing the immune system. Virtually all alternative cancer treatments will cause a person to live to the right of the baseline.

This is especially true of the patient eats the right foods during their treatment and avoids the wrong foods (this is called the cancer diet). The cancer diet alone has cured many cancer patients.

The question is this: how do we use alternative treatments to get a person to live well past the baseline? Or to put it another way, how do we get alternative treatments to cure cancer, in the sense that the main body of cancer cells is dead and the immune system is built up to the point it can deal with new cancer cells?

There are more than 400 alternative treatments for cancer that will allow more than half of those who use those treatments to cure their cancer. These treatments can usually be combined to increase the effectiveness of just one protocol.

The best of the alternative cancer treatments (which are actually combinations of several alternative treatments) will easily cure over 90% of those who use those treatments instead of orthodox treatments. The Kelley treatment is somewhat obsolete by today’s standards and today’s definitions are even more strict than what Kelley used.

I am totally convinced, based on my extensive research, that if the pharmaceutical industry (i.e. Big Pharma), our government agencies, the American Cancer Society, the American Medical Association, etc., put their money and efforts into natural medicine research, that it would not be long before 99% of all cancer patients would not die of anything related to cancer or cancer treatments, directly or indirectly! People would be more afraid of the flu than cancer! That is the way it should be, but that is not the way it is.

Only the person’s immune system or the safe and selective killing of cancer cells will cause a person to live longer than the baseline. Orthodox treatments destroy a person’s immune system and do not selectively kill cancer cells, nor do they safely kill cancer cells. Chemotherapy is both toxic and carcinogenic.

Yet, all the time doctors tell their patients something like this: if you don’t have chemotherapy you will live six months. What exactly does that mean? It implies that the patient will live longer if they have chemotherapy, than if they avoid chemotherapy. But there is absolutely no scientific evidence that chemotherapy, except for a few rare types of cancer, ever extends the total life of a patient. It is nothing but a scare tactic.

What Orthodox Medicine is Hiding

Suppose you had a chart where for each type of cancer, diagnosed at each stage, there is listing of every possible type of cancer treatment plan, alternative and orthodox, along with the total life that each plan provides the typical patient with this type of cancer, which is diagnosed at each stage. Suppose also that these statistics were compiled by honest people.

For example, suppose there was a page for stage 3 / pancreas cancer. On this page was a listing of the 100 best alternative treatments for stage 3 pancreas cancer, along with the expected total life of new cancer patients who chose each of these treatment plans. Likewise, suppose on this same page was a listing of the total life for each of the dozens of types of orthodox cancer treatments. Plus, suppose there was the total life of those who refused all treatments.

By looking at this chart, a person with newly diagnosed stage 3 pancreas cancer could easily determine which of the more than one hundred types of cancer treatments had the highest total life for stage 3 pancreas cancer. Likewise, suppose a similar chart existed for each type of cancer, diagnosed at each stage.

To apply this concept, suppose you were diagnosed with Stage 3 pancreas cancer. Suppose you looked at the chart for Pancreas cancer / Stage 3 and saw that a patient who took a specific orthodox treatment had a total life expectancy of 10 months and that patients who were treated with the Cameron/Pauling vitamin C protocol, and did not have any orthodox treatments, had a total life of 100 months. (Note: the actual total life numbers are not known but the total life ratio in this hypothetical example is based on the actual Cameron/Pauling ratio.)

You would note that the orthodox patients went through months of very painful chemotherapy and radiation, not to mention they suffered much sickness, the destruction of their digestive tract linings, sterility, DNA damage, destruction of their immune system, etc. The vitamin C patients had none of these side effects, instead they had their immune system built up and lived 90 months longer. Which treatment would you pick based on the chart?

Wouldn’t you love to see the chart for your situation if you were recently diagnosed with cancer!! I would love to see such charts!! This web site would not be necessary and I could get my life back!!

Having a chart as I just described, for the best 100 alternative treatments for cancer and for all orthodox treatments, it would be easy to decide which treatment protocol to choose. However, it is the sole purpose of the FDA, NCI (National Cancer Institute), and NIH (National Institutes of Health), all government agencies, the ACS, etc. to make sure such charts are never created.

Why are government agencies and orthodox medicine so opposed to these charts existing? The reason is that if such charts existed no one would ever choose orthodox treatments for cancer. No one EVER!

If such charts existed, the percentage of recently diagnosed cancer patients who died of something unrelated to cancer and unrelated to cancer treatments would quickly climb to over 99% because everyone would take a combination of the best alternative treatments for their type of cancer! That is not an exaggeration!

But the government doesn’t want you to pick the right treatment, they want you to pick one of the Big Pharma treatments. They don’t want you to know the truth.

It is not that these people want you to die they don’t care about that they want money. The typical high-level government employee in the FDA, NIH or NCI will be a millionaire within 3 years of quitting the government. Big Pharma will reward them for their services while they were with the government. This word spreads back to the current executives and the cycle of loyalty continues.

Essentially, the government agencies are nothing but departments of Big Pharma. I will say more about that in a moment.

    There is no lobby in Washington as large, as powerful or as well financed as the pharmaceutical lobby, and according to a report from Public Citizen, more than half of the drug industry’s 625 registered lobbyists [that is more than the number of members of Congress!] are either former members of Congress or former Congressional staff members and government employees Other evidence suggesting possible FDA bias turned up in a study revealing that 37 of the 49 top FDA officials who left the agency moved into high corporate positions with the company they had regulated. Over 100 FDA officials owned stock in the drug companies they were assigned to manage.

But let’s think about those charts I talked about earlier. Suppose that orthodox treatments were at the top of every one of the charts, and alternative cancer treatment fared very poorly against orthodox treatments. Why would Big Pharma feel the need to bribe public officials and Congressmen?

If alternative medicine didn’t work, the FDA would shut down all the quacks, and Big Pharma wouldn’t care. But it isn’t the quacks that Big Pharma is concerned about. It is the people that can cure cancer that Big Pharma bribes the FDA to shut down.

Yes, there are alternative medicine quacks out there, but by shutting down the real quacks, there is a public impression that everyone the FDA shuts down is a quack. Nothing could be further from the truth. Many of the clinics the feds shut down (whether FDA, FTC or whatever) are top-notch alternative clinics that have very high cure rates. There have been scores of excellent alternative practitioners (some of them M.D.s) who had far better cure rates than orthodox medicine, but who were shut down by orthodox medicine, usually by the AMA or FDA.

By far the world’s greatest repository of alternative medicine cures for cancer is at the FDA offices. These are cures they have shut down. I have, on more than one occasion, personally come across a superb alternative cancer cure only to learn that the FDA shut it down 20 years ago and the details of the treatment have been buried!!

The point is that if orthodox medicine were superior, in terms of total life, why wouldn’t they want those charts to be made?! Ponder that carefully. If orthodox medicine were superior, they would gladly put together the statistical information using total life to prove their supposed superiority. They wouldn’t need layer after layer of deception the truth would tell the story. They could save a lot of money in bribes and lobbyists if those charts existed and their products were superior.

The NIH would gladly fund hundreds of legitimate studies for alternative medicine if these studies gave them the results they wanted. But they know the truth and know they must suppress the truth and suppress the charts. It is the attempts by alternative medicine to put together enough evidence to gather these statistics that is the primary target of government corruption (yes, the ease and willingness to be bribed is one of the major criteria for the definition of corruption).

Now consider this. If orthodox cancer therapy were superior to alternative cancer therapies, then alternative cancer practitioners would want their patients to have surgery, as part of the treatment, to kill concentrated masses of cancer cells, and hope this caused the patients to live longer. In other words, alternative doctors would use surgery to hide the ineffectiveness of their treatments. On the other hand, orthodox treatments would not require surgery because orthodox treatments would safely kill cancer cells.

But just the opposite is true. Orthodox therapies request surgery to kill concentrated masses of cancer cells and hide their ineffectiveness. On the other hand, I have never heard of one of the respected alternative cancer practitioners recommend surgery to kill cancer cells. It isn’t necessary. The only time surgery is recommended is to remove the pain of a tumor pressing against another organ or if there is a blockage or there is some immediate life-threatening problem caused by the tumor. But never is surgery recommended as part of the cancer treatment.

Ditto for radiation.

Yet, in spite of the fact that orthodox medicine uses surgery, in almost every case, a person would live longer if they refused all orthodox treatments, including surgery.

The imaginary charts I am talking about is what the orthodox establishment, which includes the American Medical Association (AMA), FDA, NIH, NCI, American Cancer Society (ACS), quack watch, etc. don’t want you to ever see. All of these organizations are funded and controlled by Big Pharma or they are in collusion with Big Pharma. There have been over 50 books written on this corruption and suppression of truth! Have you ever heard one of these books discussed on television?

The orthodox establishment wants you to think that there is no scientific evidence that alternative treatments work. In fact, our corrupt government has carefully manufactured the public impression that there is no scientific evidence. This allows them to justify not creating the charts I have been talking about and it allows them the authority to crush alternative medicine. Future chapters of this eBook will go into the politics of cancer in far more detail.
Especially For Those Who Don’t Have Cancer

People who don’t have cancer rarely give cancer a second thought. All their life they have been conditioned to believe that the medical community is diligently making progress in the War Against Cancer. They believe there is nothing to worry about. If they get cancer, the medical community will take good care of them and furthermore a cure is always right around the corner. All of this is an assumption that could cost a person their life!

When a person is diagnosed with cancer, they are in a total state of hysteria and panic. They will grab at the first rope that is thrown to them. Guess what, orthodox practitioners are more than happy to throw them that rope.

When a person is told they have cancer, the medical establishment forcefully tells them that they immediately need to have surgery, and usually tells them they will need to have chemotherapy and radiation. This was drilled into your medical doctor while he or she was in medical school but it is a giant lie.

If you are not prepared, in advance, for the utter terror of being told you have cancer, and to the enormous pressure of orthodox medicine, you will end up being cut open and probably have toxic sludge put into your arteries. You will get sick, your immune system will be destroyed, you will wish you were dead, and it is all for nothing, because orthodox treatments for cancer are worthless and almost always do far more damage than good. And all of this will happen before you knew what hit you.

Furthermore, and understand this carefully, doctors will not tell you your options, especially your alternative cancer treatment options. If they mention alternative treatments, they are talking about using nutrition and natural substances to treat the symptoms of chemotherapy and radiation, (i.e. complementary medicine), they are not talking about the alternative cancer treatments this web site discusses.

Many cancer patients think, when they hear about complementary medicine, that orthodox medicine and alternative medicine have joined forces in a cozy relationship. The relationship is more like a lion and a lamb. Big Pharma allows limited use of natural substances to treat the symptoms of chemotherapy so patients will not drop out of chemotherapy due to sickness. No doubt their motivation is so that the patient will stay on chemotherapy longer, and thus Big Pharma will make more profits.

But what if you are diagnosed with cancer and you haven’t done your homework? You might consider telling your doctor you will think about the proposed treatments for a couple of weeks. You might buy time by asking your doctor to produce scientific articles that prove the proposed treatment extends the total life of similar cancer patients compared to patients who refused all treatments. (Warning: Do not get duped by letting your doctor talk about 5-year cure rates.)

During those two weeks, do not go to work. Spend those weeks studying this web site, then go to other web sites I link to. Do absolutely nothing but read during those two weeks.

The main thing you need to look for are testimonials. It is the testimonials, not the scientific evidence, that will convince you that alternative treatments really work. It is exactly for this reason that the medical establishment does not consider testimonials as scientific evidence. But they are scientific evidence  powerful evidence, but they don’t lead to the conclusions the medical establishment wants you come to.

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.

                  Continued 5/7/14

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.