Monday, December 30, 2013

How Bogus Scientific Studies Are Created


              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

             Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

        World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
        Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

How Bogus Scientific Studies Are Created


Over a period of 42 years, the tobacco industry spent over $220 million
funding over 1,500 scientific studies, yet not a single one of these studies
could find a relationship between tobacco and lung cancer, heart disease, etc.
The point ismentioning this fact was that scientists are more than willing
to accept money to do bogus scientific studies.

In fact you can almost always predict what conclusions a "scientific" study
will come to by knowing just one key fact: "who funded the study." The person
who funded the study will always get the conclusion they want. People who
loosely call themselves "scientists" will always make sure of that.

The pharmaceutical industry, with their total control over the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), etc. have also funded many, many millions of dollars of
bogus scientific studies. In fact, their budget is in the billions of dollars
every year!! Couple this with their control of the media and you have the
situation we are in today.

It is the Prime Directive of medical research to do two things:

First, make it appear there is "scientific evidence" for orthodox cancer
treatments, orthodox heart disease prevention treatments, etc., and

Second, make it appear there is "no scientific evidence" for alternative
cancer treatments, alternative heart disease prevention treatments, and so on.

But how can a scientist not find value in a nutrient that treats cancer or
heart disease when the truth of the matter is that this substance does have
value? That is what this article is about.

This will summarize a number of different tactics and tricks thatscientists
can use to insure that their masters who fund their studies getexactly what
they want.

Tactics, Tricks and Fraud in Scientific Studies...Using Synthetic 
 Versions of a Nutrient In the Study.

In many studies of nutrients, especially vitamins, synthetic versions of the
nutrient were used in the study. Synthetic versions of a vitamin do not have
nearly the effect on a disease as a quality-processed natural version of the
same nutrient. For example:

    "A new landmark study suggests that pregnant women should ask their
physicians for a prenatal supplement that contains natural vitamin E for
optimal health insurance. According to this new research, the human placenta
can deliver natural vitamin E to the fetus in much greater concentration (3.5
to one) than the synthetic supplement.

    Natural and synthetic vitamin E are not the same. Previous research has
shown natural vitamin E is better retained and more biologically active than
synthetic. To identify the kind of vitamin E in a supplement, it is necessary
to read the ingredients listed on the label. Natural vitamin E begins with
"d," as in "d-alpha-tocopherol." The synthetic version begins with "dl.""

The Dosage is Too Low

When the news media blasts to the world that a particular vitamin or other
nutrient "does not work" at preventing or treating a disease, they may mention
the dosage of the product used by the orthodox scientist, but they won't
mention the real world dosage used by alternative medicine practitioners.
Frequently, the orthodox "study" only used a small fraction of the dosage
generally used by alternative medicine.

Isolating a Natural Substance That Works in Synergy With Other Nutrients
Scientists like to study one nutrient at a time, ignoring that in raw, whole
foods, this nutrient may be the best nutrient in isolation, but in fact this
nutrient only works in combination with several other key nutrients in the
raw, whole food. For example, orthodox scientists may study Vitamin A, by
itself, instead of the effect of fresh, properly prepared carrot juice. By
isolating one substance, they can then generalize that they have proven that
the entire natural food has no effect on prevention or treatment.

Isolating and Studying the Wrong Nutrient

There are many thousands of phytonutrients in plants. No one has a clue how
many of them there are. Most of them have not been identified or isolated. Few
of them have ever been tested for treating cancer. With glyconutrients, the
situation may even be worse. Glyconutrients may some day be found to be more
effective at curing cancer than phytonutrients.

When massive evidence suggests that carrot juice is one of the best treatments
for cancer, scientists quickly try to guess what it is about carrots that
kills cancer cells so well.

It might be beta carotene, it might be alpha carotene. No one knows for sure.
It might be a combination of 20 different things, only 4 of which have been
isolated and identified as of this date.

Nevertheless, such a possibility will not stop scientists from trying to prove
that carrots cannot cure cancer. They will select one or two nutrients in
carrots, claim that they know that these nutrients are the only cancer-
fighting nutrients in the carrots, and then use every trick and tactic they
can come up with to "prove" that carrot juice cannot cure cancer.

No one knows the truth about why it works, but many people do know that
carrotjuice is a major part of many alternative cancer treatments. That is a

So is Essiac Tea, but know one knows for sure why. Doctors have known for
overa hundred years that the herb Sheep Sorrel kills cancer cells, but no one
can truthfully say they know what it is about Sheep Sorrel that kills cancer

But scientists don't want you to know how complex the synergy is between
multiple nutrients. They want you to think that they know what the nutrients
are that work, and that they have proven that since these nutrients cannot, in
isolation, cure cancer, that carrot juice (or whatever) cannot cure cancer.

Contaminating the Substance Being Tested

In one case, at least, the NIH contaminated an already bogus pill being used
in a study. Natural laetrile cannot and has never given a patient the symptoms
of cyanide poisoning. It simply is impossible. The NIH refused to allow an
alternative laetrile vendor to supply natural laetrile for the study - so they
could create a custom pill for the study.

In creating their custom bogus laetrile pill, it was not enough for them to
not have any natural laetrile in the pill. A worthless pill would not have
given any patient the symptoms of cyanide poisoning. They also had to lace
thepill with inorganic cyanide so that the patients would have the symptoms
of cyanide poisoning.

In other words, since they could not make a natural laetrile pill big enough
to induce the symptoms of cyanide poisoning, they provided a pill with no
natural cyanide, but laced it with inorganic cyanide to induce the symptom.

Modify the Complete Treatment Plan

Generally, when the federal government wants to make sure a study it funds
will kill all of the patients, in order to make some natural substance look
ineffective, they will use multiple techniques. For example, when doing a
study of laetrile they created a totally bogus "laetrile pill" and laced it
with inorganic cyanide, as just mentioned. But that was not enough. They
alsodid not give the patients the standard cancer diet used by alternative
practitioners in a complete laetrile treatment. This was easy to see because
this cancer diet, by itself, even without laetrile, would have produced a
survival rate significantly higher than orthodox medicine.

Tricky Statistics

Particularly with regards to "survival time," scientists frequently use
worthless statistical techniques to come to the conclusions their funding
sponsors want them to come to. For example, rather then measure the total
survival times of two groups, they may measure the percentage of people
who are still alive after a short length of time. My "Introduction" article
goes into this trick in more detail.

Choosing the Confidence Interval

A "confidence interval" is a number used in statistics which provides the
level of confidence that the results of the study are valid. In trying to find
"evidence" that an orthodox treatment works, another statistical trick is to
use a low confidence interval combined with a large number of studies. In
other words, if you use a low confidence interval and fund a lot of studies,
eventually one of the studies will give you a "statistically valid" study. But
it is not because the product works, it is because of the nature of statistics
and probability.

On the other hand, when looking at alternative studies, there is no confidence
interval high enough that will convince the FDA to approve an alternative
treatment. As I show in my eBook, applying statistics to the results of one
alternative doctor yielded a confidence interval equivalent to more than a
thousand standard deviations (three standard deviations yields a commonly
accepted confidence interval in science, using more than three standard
deviations is too high for most studies). But more than one thousand standard
deviations is not enough evidence for orthodox medicine.

              Continued on 01/01/14

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

 Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Cancer Treatment...Follow The Money Trail

Who do you believe? Follow The Money Trail


              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

             Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

        World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
        Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

Who do you believe? Follow The Money Trail

When I was first researching cancer, I ran into both kinds of web sites, the
sites controlled by orthodox medicine and the sites controlled by alternative
medicine. The quackwatch page (one of the orthodox sites) caused me to wonder
whether all of this alternative medicine stuff was a bunch of baloney. Even
though I am an expert at Machiavellian tactics and logic, I didn't know enough
about the bogus scientific studies they were referring to to figure out what
was going on.

Then I came across the book Alive and Well, by Dr. Binzel. After reading the
first two chapters of this book the picture became very clear. I had seen this
same pattern before when dealing with physics and energy (although different
government agencies were involved). I saw how the Department of Energy was
suppressing discovery after discovery which would lead to very cheap energy
costs (especially gasoline costs). In the same way, the effort to fight
alternative treatments for cancer is intentional, well organized, well funded
and includes U.S. government agencies (e.g. FDA, NIH, NCI).

Most people in America would never consider taking alternative treatments
for cancer. This is because the orthodox medical establishment has total control
over everything a typical person hears in their life. Unless a person is an
expert at internet research (and quite frankly that wouldn't do any good
unless they knew what to look for), or they happened to run into someone who
knows what is going on (and if they did they would probably consider them to
be whack-o because they have been so efficiently brainwashed), they will never
know the truth about anything.

I should mention how the establishment crushed the Linus Pauling heart disease
prevention program. They didn't say anything about it in the media, good or
bad (i.e. they blacklisted it), and eventually the truth simply died out. That
was all it took. There are many "blacklisted" organizations and truths that
are forbidden to be uttered by the media.

There is no "freedom of speech" in America because only one "side" is allowed
to speak on television or radio because they own the stations. The
Constitution was written before radio and television were invented so no
provision was made in the Constitution to force the mass media to present both
side of the issues.

As a second example of blacklisting, when was the last time you heard a member
of the "John Birch Society" talk for five minutes or more on the television
(both Binzel and G. Edward Griffin belong or belonged to the JBS, and others)?
Most people under 40 have never heard of the John Birch Society. I mention
these things because these are just two of many examples of how potent
blacklisting is, and more importantly, how overwhelming what you know is
controlled totally by large, corrupt corporations that advertise. The owners
of virtually all television stations, large and small, are also large

I should mention that General Electric, which owns NBC, manufactures medical
equipment. GE Medical Systems manufactures very expensive equipment used by
both cancer doctors and heart disease doctors:

    "In addition to its industrial holdings, General Electric owns NBC which
controls the following assets:
    9 television stations including ones in New York, Los Angeles and

Washington DC
    25% of more of the following cable channels: CNBC, CourtTV, Bravo, MSNBC,

A&E, the History Channel
    Plus these key news programs:
    The Today Show
    Meet the Press
    Dateline NBC
    NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw"

Now do you understand why you have never hear anything positive about
alternative treatments for cancer or alternative heart disease prevention

It is all about money, not people. Follow the pharmaceutical industry money
trail and you will know with perfect certainty who is on their side. If
someone that receives Big Pharma money says anything truthful about
alternative medicine, the money dries up immediately.


This book can be summarized in several bullet points:

Since the 1920s medical progress in curing cancer has come to a virtual dead
end. The reason: surgery, chemotherapy and radiation treatments are so, so
profitable for pharmaceutical companies, chemical companies, petroleum
companies, doctors, hospitals, medical equipment makers, charities, media
companies, and many other industries.

The most important concept in chemotherapy is the concept of "remission."
However, remission, response, tumor markers, etc. are terms that are
meaningless. They are supposed to equate to "length of life since diagnosis,"
but in fact there is no correlation between being in remission and "length of
life since diagnosis."

"Cure rates" are another deception tactic of orthodox medicine. Rather than
use the logical concept of "length of life since diagnosis," orthodox medicine
uses a meaningless statistic based on the percentage of people who live for 5
years between diagnosis and death. This statistic is easily manipulated to
make orthodox treatments look more and more effective. But the only thing
that really improves is their ability to deceive.

Chemotherapy drugs are evaluated by the FDA based on tumor size reduction
andother irrelevant measurements, not on the basis of extending the life of the
patient compared to a person not taking orthodox treatments. When they talk
about extending a person's life, it is based on comparing one or more toxic
poisons to another group of toxic poisons.

In most cases a person would live longer, and have a far higher quality of
life, if they took no orthodox treatments for cancer.

Chemotherapy generally does far more harm to a patient than good. It destroys
the immune system, making it more difficult for some alternative treatments to
work, loses valuable time for the patient to take more effective treatments,
causes people to die of complications directly and indirectly from
chemotherapy, causes enormous pain and sickness, etc. Chemotherapy is
virtually worthless, but it is very profitable.

The uselessness of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation is hidden behind a maze
of very sophisticated false and misleading statistics, misleading definitions,
meaningless concepts and many other techniques. Above all, there is a complete
failure to compare chemotherapy to the statistics of people who refuse
orthodox treatments and there is an intentional failure to meaningfully
compare the Big 3 to alternative treatments.

Cancer research today is largely a fraud. If only a small percentage of
research money were spent on studying alternative treatments, known to work,
cancer would be a sad footnote in history books within 10 years. (Note: It is
absolutely critical that alternative health zealots control that research and
money or it will be just another scam.)

In comparing Vitamin C, and perhaps by taking a few other vitamins and
minerals with Vitamin C, patients who avoid orthodox treatments would live
several times longer than similar patients who took orthodox treatments. They
would have a far better immune system, have far less pain (zero pain from the
treatment), feel better and have a much higher quality of life. In other
words, Vitamin C therapy is far superior to the Big 3.

Yet Vitamin C therapy, even with the Hoffer nutrients added, is not one of the
"top 100" alternative treatments for cancer. It's cure rate is far too low to
make that list.

Bogus scientific studies have been commissioned by the NIH specifically to
discredit valid studies and the testimonies of tens of thousands of patients
cured of cancer with alternative treatments.

The media are nothing but worthless whores. They sell-out to the highest
bidder, which is always the corrupt pharmaceutical industry. Everything they
say is aimed to please those that pay the most.

The media has many different techniques they routinely use to brainwash the
general public. They can all be summarized in two words: "whited sepulcher."
They lie, withhold information, deceive you, tell half-truths, and so on.
The job of the FDA, NIH and NCI is to suppress the truth about alternative
treatments for cancer. Their number one job is to insure there is "no
scientific evidence" for alternative treatments so that alternative treatments
can be legally suppressed. They are corrupt to the core and are directly
responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans every year.
The reason for the FDA, etc. suppressing the truth of alternative medicine is
so they can continue to suppress the availability of alternative medicine
substances and so the AMA can suppress the availability of patients to get
alternative treatments from medical doctors.

Congress, whose job is to protect Americans and eliminate the corruption in
Government, are largely inept and could easily be accused of intentionally
"looking the other way" at what the FDA is doing, just as they have been
"looking the other way" at what the tobacco industry has been doing for over
70 years.

Not only does the media provide a lot of misinformation, but the internet also
has an enormous amount of misinformation about alternative treatments.

Universities frequently pass on this bogus information.

The scientific evidence for alternative treatments for cancer is over-
whelmingly superior to the scientific treatments for orthodox medicine.

For those who understand statistics, the difference is greater than 1,000
standard deviations in some comparisons. Alternative treatments are so good,
many thousands of people cure their own cancer without any medical help.

The primary way the medical establishment tries to suppress the tens of
thousands of testimonials of people cured of their cancer by alternative
medicine (most of them were sent home to die by orthodox medicine before
they started alternative treatments) is to talk about "spontaneous remission.
" The joint concepts of "spontaneous remission" and "psychological remission"
are statistical nonsense and are nothing more than overt lies.

In short, American's have been sold a "Bill of Goods." Alternative treatments
work, but they are suppressed. Orthodox treatments don't work, but by using
sophisticated statistics, clever definitions, etc. it appears to the public
that they do work.

I have called this a "war." When people hear the term "war," they think of
guns, tanks, jet airplanes and soldiers. They think about mindless tyrants
shaking their fists on television.

But the war in medicine is very different. The tyrants in this war hide their
real intentions. This is a "war" where the weapons are information. The
American people know exactly half of all truth, the half that is most

    "A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot
survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he
is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor
moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through
all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor
appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he
wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies
deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly
and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the
body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.

The traitor is the plague."
    Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Orator - 106-43 B.C.

Copyright (c) 2003 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Your Trip To The Left Side of the Fence


              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

             Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

        World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
        Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

                  Continued from 12/22/13

Your Trip To The Left Side of the Fence

Well, just for the heck of it, out of morbid curiosity and to test your debate skills,
you decide to walk over to the left side of the fence and talk to a creationist. You
carefully walk up to (gulp, drum roll): Hermann the Horrible Hermit Heretic. Be
careful, you say to yourself, close your ears and don't listen, this person is an idiot.
Oh well, its cold outside and your hands are in your pocket, so you listen.

You shake hands with Hermann and exchange pleasantries. Right away you
are amazed at something: Hermann can talk! You had always been taught
that creationists had the IQ of a rodent and wore beenie caps with rotors.

Hermann starts by talking about the first living organism, and about its DNA
component and its cell membrane component. He states that even though it is
 absurd that a 300,000 nucleotide chain (300 genes with an averagelength of
1,000 nucleotides) can randomly form, even if it did, the statistical probability
that the first DNA had a permutation of nucleotides, such that 300 viable proteins
could be created by this DNA genome, has a probability that is far less than:
10-30,000 (this is a probability of 1 divided by a 1 with 30,000 zeros behind it).

(Note: the 10-30,000 figure is based on the assumption that 1 in 100 random
permutations of 1,000 nucleotides will form a protein vital to a living organism.
This is a very generous figure for the evolutionists,because the real figure is
probably far, far less than 1 in a billion.)

He then stated that even if it could create 300 proteins, there is anabsurdly small
probability that these 300 proteins would form a set of proteins that could support
the life of a new organism. He did not givea probability for this because there isn't
enough known about sets of proteins.

You quickly do some math in your head. You remember from science class
that there are 1080 atoms in our universe. Then, you imagine there are 1029,920
universes just like ours in a cluster (that is a one followedby 29,920 zeros). All
of these universes combined would have 1,030,000 atoms.

Suppose some government wants to do a lottery and in order to win the lottery
you have to pick the single, correct atom from among all of the atoms in the
1029,920 universes. The probability of winning this lottery is 10-30,000. You
ask yourself: "who is so bad at math they would buy a ticket in that lottery?"

Then you remember what your math teacher taught you: "the lottery is a tax
on people who are bad at math." Then you realize there are a lot of people who
would spend their life savings buying lottery tickets in that lottery. Finally, you
come out of your daydreaming and realize that Hermann was talking while you
were doing the math in your head.

Then you hear about the ridiculous probability of the first cell membrane forming
by accident. For two hours Hermann gives you an earful about how incredibly
complex a eukaryotic cell is. It is so complex that even the exobiologists admit
that one could not form by accident from a prebiotic pool. Thus, they claim that
the first cell was a prokaryotic cell, and that there are conditions where a prokaryotic
cell can survive without an organic host (since this is the first cell, there are no
organic hosts to feed on). But even so, Hermann tells you that prokaryotic cells
still could not have formed by accident because they are almost as complex as
eukaryotic cells.

Then you hear that the first DNA and first cell membrane could not have formed in
the same prebiotic pool, and thus you are told it was virtually impossible that they
could ever get together.

Hermann then starts talking about new genomes and macroevolution. You then
learn about the improbability of irreducibly complex protein systems forming large
numbers of complex inter-related proteins in the same random mutation event in

You learn about the mathematical absurdities caused by the issue of viable
permutations of nucleotides from random mutations needed to create any
new gene in any new genome. You hear that this is another case of absurd
probabilities caused by permutations.

You then hear about the "morphing of the embryo." A new creature starts out
as one type of cell, but when the "baby" is born it has many different kinds of cells.
This means that some cells, when they divide, must divide into two different kinds
of cells. The timing of these strange divisions has to be with pinpoint accuracy.
You learn that the instructions for this pinpoint accuracy must be built into the
DNA, thus making random mutations even less likely to be advantageous (i.e.
requiring more precise chains of nucleotides). When Hermann started taking
about the morphing "timing"issues and base-2 trees, you started thinking that
Hermann might even be smart.

Then Hermann starts to talk about the evolutionists (this is the anti-
evolution part, heard from a creationist viewpoint).

He tells you that the first argument the evolutionists use is that "we exist,"thus our
existence is proof of evolution. Hermann then likens this logic to the theory that
all of Shakespeare's plays were written by six monkeys locked in the basement
of a building. He states: is it logical that because Shakespeare's plays "exist," that
the monkey theory is true?

You then hear how "punctuated equilibrium" is really a super irreducibly
complex protein system, and how absurd it is to claim that it was not necessary
for irreducibly complex protein systems to have mutated all at once, but at the
same time to believe in punctuated equilibrium. You hear why the phylogenetic
tree is really a cover-up for the gaps in transitional species. You also learn about
the massive assumptions evolutionists make with regards to carbon dating bones.
You also hear the totally unproven assumptions and very shallow logic evolutionists
make with respect to mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA. And so on.

Ten hours pass and you realize the sun went down and it is now dark -and
Hermann is still talking. You also realize it has been four hours since you had a
clue what he was talking about. You also realize that this is not what you expected.
You expected some wild and crazy theories.But in fact you realize that creationists
are not stupid and they really do have some very strong arguments. Then you also
realize that what you had been taught by the evolutionists, about what the creationists
believe, has absolutely no relationship to what the creationists actually do believe.

You finally go home, very confused.

Note: if you are interested in learning more about creation science, see one
of these two books:

For the general public:   Introduction to the Mathematics of Evolution

For LDS:   Prophets or Evolution - An LDS Perspective

Final Comments

This simple story demonstrates the very sad state of affairs in America and
throughout the world. Neither schools, nor corporations, nor governments want
anyone to hear both sides of any issue from [the people on] both sides of the fence.
They would rather have a brainwashed student than a thinking student. Schools
act as if they have all of the answers and that it is not necessary to teach students
to think for themselves. Students are graded on how well they regurgitate "facts,"
not on how well they think. Students learn very early on that all of the benefits
are on one side of the fence and that they should spend their life gathering up
the benefits.

    "Education ... has produced a vast population able to read but unable to
distinguish what is worth reading."  G.M. Trevelyan

People are taught from birth to assume and expect that those in the
"establishment" (such as the schools, the news broadcasters and newspapers):
1) Have no vested interests or conflicts of interest,
2) Have perfect intelligence,
3) Have all the facts for both sides of the fence,
4) Are totally neutral and unbiased,
5) Have perfect integrity,
6) Have your best interests in mind, and
7) Are truly open-minded,
8) Love truth more than benefits.

And above all, you are never, never allowed to think that money or power
(i.e. benefits) could possibly influence what the establishment teaches you.

Dream on, this is the real world we are talking about.

It is quite probable, that from the time a person starts first grade, to the time
they get a PhD or M.D., they never once hear both sides of any issue from the
people on both sides of a fence. And even if they do, theyhave been so
brainwashed by one side, or they are so interested in the benefits of one side,
they simply pay no attention to the "other side."

As incredible as this sounds, it is difficult to get people to grasp the concept of
hearing both sides of an issue from both sides of the fence. All your life you have
been taught that it is not necessary. Society always has all of the answers, and
anyone who does not agree with society is a crackpot, quack, moron, rebel,
incorrigible, mentally unstable, or whatever.

Applying The Concepts of the Fence to Cancer

Now lets talk about the fence that separates orthodox medicine from alternative
medicine (it is more like a steel-reinforced brick wall with machine gun towers
on it, and the machine gun towers are all owned by the orthodox side).

When your doctor went through medical school, he or she was taught all the
good things about chemotherapy, radiation treatments and all the other orthodox
medical treatments for cancer. If your doctor was told anything about alternative
treatments for cancer, it was the very biased bad things. Sound familiar? Has your
doctor ever spent one hour listening to an expert on alternative treatments for
cancer? It is very doubtful, though he or she has probably heard a few experiences
from their patients.

Similarly, you are second level brainwashed, meaning you have been taught
by your brainwashed doctor (who doesn't know anything truthful about alternative
treatments for cancer), all of the good things about chemotherapy. You no doubt
have heard many times how wonderful medical schools are and how they are
based on a solid scientific foundation. You have been taught that the AMA
(American Medical Association) is carefully watching out for your health. Not
only are all of these things false, but there are about one hundred books that have
been written to expose the falsity of these assumptions.

With all of the brainwashing from the media, your schools and your doctors, after
all of this, suppose you pick up a copy of the book "World Without Cancer - The
Story of Vitamin B17" by G. Edward Griffin. You decide to read this book with an
open mind. IMPOSSIBLE! There is no possible way you can read this book with
an open mind. If you read it at all you will read it to find the errors in it, and what
is wrong with G. Edward Griffin.

Do you understand? Every day of your life, for all the years of your life, you
have been brainwashed and have heard only two of the four elements of the debate.
There is no possible way you can undo that brainwashing in 2 hours. You can't read
that book with an open mind. It is impossible for you to ignore many years of solid,
daily brainwashing.

Everything you have seen on television, everything you have read in books,
everything you have been taught in school, every magazine article you have read
in your life, have all told you the same story line - orthodox medicine is far superior
to alternative medicine.

So what can you do if you want to know the truth? You can't, but you can start.
You have to have a clear understanding, and a clear admission to yourself, that
you have only heard two of the four truth categories, and that now it is time to study
the other two categories. You must want to hear the other two categories. Then,
and only then, can you make the attempt to read it with an open mind.

Copyright (c) 2003, 2010 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Wednesday, December 25, 2013



                             CHRISTMAS                                                                                                                                                                                                EVERYONE

Monday, December 23, 2013

How The Media and Establishment Control The Public.


              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

             Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

        World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
        Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

Hi Everybody, I hope your weekend was great and I hope you are 
getting ready for Christmas. For me, this is a special Christmas because 
I've lived one more year of life even though our medical profession 
marked me "a short time to live".

My prayer for yo is "Open your minds and hearts to learning more 
about your own health" because as the times passes our health care is 
going to get worse.


You might be curious what techniques our public schools, the news media, our politicians, etc. etc. use to control the public. Their methods are more sophisticated than you probably think. Some of the techniques used by orthodox medicine have already been discussed. Controlling the information that the general public has access to is absolutely essential to the establishment. The reason is that in school or in life you are probably at some time going to run into a "renegade" who just refuses to believe what he or she is told and has a different point of view. It is the control of information that conditions you to ignore what they say. If you don't believe me, just read on.

Hearing Both Sides of an Issue

To illustrate the control of information (aka brainwashing), let me use Darwin's "Theory of Evolution" as an example of teaching what I want to get across, since that is a controversial area in which everyone seems to have an opinion. More importantly, it is the only theory that is allowed to be taught in our schools.

There are two broad categories of theories about evolution: first, are those who think that evolution occurred by total accident. Second, are those who think that God had a hand in evolution or God simply created each species independently. Let us call the first group the "evolutionists" and the second two groups the "creationists." There are actually several different camps (i.e. different theories) within each group, and there are hybrid groups (i.e. hybrid theories), but let us assume there are only two simple groups.

To visualize the two different camps, suppose there is a large field and there is a fence that bisects the field and you are standing at one end of the fence looking down the fence. On the right side of this fence are the evolutionists (the people who make up the "establishment") and on the left side of this fence are the creationists (the people who disagree with the "establishment" point of view).

You have the choice of siding with the establishment or the renegades. In some cases this choice could affect your job. For example, if you taught biology in a public high school, and you believed in creationism, and taught creationism in your classroom, you might lose your job.

If you are only looking for the benefits, and a promotion, then there is no question as to what theory you will teach. The evolution side of the fence has virtually all the benefits. But let us suppose you are one of those rare people who are more interested in truth than benefits. What are you going to do?

Suppose you want to know the truth (as best as you are capable of honestly determining as an "open-minded" person) - is evolutionism or creationism correct based on the evidence currently available?

Suppose that you decide to start your decision making journey by talking first with the evolutionists; because everything you have heard in school is that evolution has been proven to be true. So you head to the right side of the fence and start talking to an evolutionist.

Suppose this person tells you all the reasons why evolution occurred by accident. He might go into microevolution (what changes can occur within a species that shares the same genome), macroevolution (the creation of new genomes), why transitional species cannot be found in many cases, punctuated equilibrium, all the bones paleontologists have found, and so on.

After this conversation, you start to walk away, but the person stops you. Then this same evolutionist starts telling you all of the things that are wrong with the creationists. He tells you one theory after another of the creationists and why each theory cannot be true and what a bunch of goons they are.

After this conversation, you now feel that you understand both the evolutionist's and the creationist's theories of evolution. You decide it is not necessary to go to the left side of the fence and talk to a creationist because you already think you understand their views and why their views are wrong.

A Common Mistake

If you made such a decision, you would be making a common mistake: you have heard both sides of the issue, but from only one person on one side of the fence. You have really only heard how the people on one side of the fence feel about the issues. But you haven't heard the arguments of the creationists, from a creationist, nor have you heard why the creationists think that the evolutionists are wrong.

There are actually four categories of the two sides (these are the four things you need to hear to make an informed decision):

1) pro-evolution (from the evolutionist side),
2) anti-creation (from the evolutionist side),
3) pro-creation (from the creationist side),
4) anti-evolution (from the creationist side).

In other words, from the right side of the fence you have heard the pro-evolution arguments and also from the right side of the fence you have heard all of the anti-creationist arguments. But note that you have not heard the pro-creationist arguments, from a creationist, nor have you heard the anti-evolution arguments, from a creationist. You have only heard two of the four categories because you have only heard from one person who is on one side of the fence.

Do you really know both sides of the issue? No you don't! You only know one side of the issue and two of the four categories. Until you go to the left side of the fence and hear about the pro-creationist views, from a creationist, and you hear the anti-evolution views, from a creationist, you don't have a basis for making an objective decision.

The Way We Have Been Taught

At this point we need to stop and think for a moment. We have been conditioned all of our lives not to listen to the "renegades." In physics, you hear how wonderful Einstein was, but you are told never to talk to anyone who challenges Einstein (someone like Roland De Witte, for example). In science class you were taught that evolution has been proven to be true, and you have been taught that the creationists are all a bunch of religious nuts.

This same kind of bias has been drilled into you for every conceivable type of issue. You have graduated from school thinking you have all the answers and that there are no open issues that need to be debated. In other words, you think the establishment is all-knowing.

All your life you have been taught not to listen to the people on both sides of the fence. All your life you have been taught by people inside the "establishment" and you have been taught that what the "establishment" teaches is true, and you have been taught what is wrong with the renegades and you have been taught not to listen to them. All your life you have been taught two of the four things you need to make an informed decision. You have been brainwashed.

And now I come along and tell you to listen to the renegades. Why? Because, quite frankly, sometimes the "establishment" is wrong. Actually, it is frequently wrong. There, I said it, sometimes the renegades are right! You will never, never know when the renegades are right unless you talk to one of them with an open-mind!

Did it ever occur to you that what the "establishment" tells you about the creationists is not what the creationists really believe, or perhaps what you heard about the creationists is what only a very small percentage of them believe? You cannot trust an evolutionist to correctly represent the views of the creationists. They are biased. They will pick the most fantastic views of a small percentage of the creationists, then twist and contort their views. They will leave out the beliefs of the other 90% of the creationists. When they are done, what they say may not even remotely represent what a real creationist believes.

"Scientific" Research

But it goes much, much deeper than that. For example, the research done by paleontologists involves the dating of bones. In dating these bones there are a wide range of assumptions that must be made. Rather than give the public a huge range of dates for a bone (due to unknown issues such as moisture, radiation, etc.), they pick one specific date for the age of the bone, and that date is very generous to the evolutionists. In other words, they assume evolution is true when they pick a single date for the age of a bone, when in fact they should pick a very, very wide range of dates due to unknown information.

For example, many bones are found on the edge of rivers long dried up. Even if those bones were next to the river (when it was still flowing) for just a few hundred years, the moisture from the river could have had a huge affect on the estimated date of when that animal died.

Thus, by using generous assumptions, and not making it known that in fact there are assumptions made, they make it look like evolution "has been proven to be true." Evolution has not been proven to be true. Much of the evidence comes from generous assumptions with the data.

I can assure the reader that in some cases (my background is in mathematics and physics), the assumptions they make with the data amounts to 99% of the "evidence" used to reach their final conclusion. This is true in virtually every field of "science."

Truth Versus Benefits

But aside from all of these issues, did it ever occur to you that the people in the establishment have a conflict of interest? Let us go back to the point where you were standing at the end of the fence and had not yet moved. You had a choice to make. Before you ever decided to look into the issues you could have made your decision based on which side offered you the most benefits.

Did it ever occur to you that what you hear in the news media, for example, is being told to you by people who chose the "establishment" side for the sole reason the establishment had more benefits than the renegades? Did it ever occur to you that you have not been taught by "truth-seekers," but rather you have been taught by "benefit-seekers?"

The deciding issue for many people is not which side is right or wrong, but which side offers the most benefits. It is not a debate between truth and error, it is a debate between benefits. And many, many of the people you have listened to throughout your life have been people who have chosen benefits over truth!

We have been conditioned to believe that an "open-minded" person is someone who absorbs the propaganda of why the establishment is always right, and defends the storyline propaganda of why the renegades are always wrong.

So in reality "you" (the hypothetical person who is trying to find the truth about evolution) probably have absolutely no desire to talk to anyone on the left side of the fence. You have heard everything you think you need to hear. Thus, you are a member of the establishment and a certified "defender of the faith" of the evolutionists.

End of story - time to go home.


Copyright (c) 2003, 2010 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved  

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Can Faith in God Help Alleviate Depression?


              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

             Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

        World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
        Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

Hi Folks, We are a few days from Christmas, spending time with family and
enjoying all whjat Christmas has to offer. This is a one time, yearly occasion.
Most people look forward to Christmas...NOT TRUE.

Statistics show that this is the most depressing time of the year. Isn't that sad?

Please read the following article. It has some great information and some
answers to some questions of "What can be done" to have a Happier Christmas.



                          MERRY CHRISTMAS BIRTHDAY.

By Dr. Mercola

    Can faith in a higher power help you overcome mental illness, the most
common of which is depression? To find out, researchers at McLean hospital, a
psychiatric institution affiliated with Harvard Medical School, asked 159
patients with prominent symptoms of depression how strongly they believed in a

    They also asked how credible the patients thought their treatment was, and
how effective they believed it would be in relieving their symptoms. The
patients’ symptoms were assessed when admitted, and again upon release from
the program.

    Of the participants, 71 percent reported believing in a god or a higher
power to some extent. Those whose belief in a god was stronger, regardless of
the god or religious affiliation (including non-affiliation), were twice as
likely to respond well to the treatment and experiencing better outcomes, such

        Lessening of depression
        Reductions in self-harm
        Increases in psychological well-being (peace of mind, ability to have
       fun, general satisfaction)

    As reported by The Atlantic:

        The researchers point out that people who believed in a god, or were
affiliated with a religion, were also more likely to believe their psychiatric
treatment was credible and to expect positive results.

        It may be, they write, that 'the tendency to have faith in conventional social
constructs' can be generalized both to religion and themedical establishment.
Since other studies have shown that faith in a given treatment is an important
predictor of its effectiveness, that could helpexplain the association with improved
outcomes found here.

The Stigma of Mental Illness Within the Church

    The recent suicide of 27-year-old Matthew Warren, youngest son of Pastor
Rick Warren, founder of the mega-church Saddleback Valley Community Church in
California, brought mental illness back into view for many within the confines
of religion.

    NPR recently featured an interview with journalist and Evangelical Christian
Christine Scheller on the sometimes complicated relationship betweenfaith and
mental illness. Scheller also lost her son to suicide five years ago.

     While the stigma of mental illness does not cling to all denominations, some
churches can tend to marginalize mental health problems and view them as issues
that are best approached by reading the bible or praying.

    In Scheller’s experience, the anti-psychiatry rhetoric used in somechurches can
delay much-needed treatment. When it became clear that Scheller’syounger son

also suffered with depression, she decided to ignore the advice of the church, opting
instead to seek professional help for her son.

        Stigma about mental illness is not unique to the evangelicalcommunity. We
have our own particular ways in which it's stigmatized, but it's a pervasive problem,
she says.

Depressive Thinking Can Go Viral

    In related research published in the journal Clinical Psychological Science,
researchers suggest that certain types of depressive thinking can goviral, spreading
to others living in close proximity. As reported in Time Magazine:

        Although many people see depression as a chemical imbalance in the
brain, scientists say social context and the way you see yourself and the world
can be critical in causing and sustaining the illness... 'Thinkingstyles are a really
important factor in risk for depression,' says the study’slead author Gerald Haeffel,
associate professor of clinical psychology atNotre Dame University. 'How one
thinks about life stress and negative moods isone of the best predictors that we
have of future depression.

    The two thinking styles explored in the study were:

        Rumination; constant brooding or worrying about what might go wrong

    Both of these thinking styles have previously been linked to depression.
But whereas the first places your focus on your negative mood, the other
reflects on your lack of self worth and the consequences of an event. Says
lead researcher Haeffel:

        For example, a person who feels hopeless might lose a job and see it
as a personal failure and a sign that he will never be employable again. A
more resilient person might blame the economy or see the situation as an
opportunity to get a better position.

    The latter, hopelessness, was not found to be contagious, but rumination
was. A suggested reason for this is because hopelessness centers around your
own thoughts and deeply embedded beliefs about yourself, and so therefore
maybe less likely to have a major influence on the way others think about
themselves and their lives. Ruminating and constant brooding, however, which
focuses on all the bad things that might happen and sees the worst in every
situation, is a mode that is more easily spread and mirrored by others.

        Interestingly, depression symptoms themselves were not contagious:

simply having a roommate with symptoms of the disorder did not increase risk
of developing the mental illness. But those who picked up a ruminative style
of thinking from their roommates during the first three months of school had
more than double the number of depressive symptoms of those who either weren’t
exposed to this perspective or didn’t adopt the rumination three months later.

And the risk was magnified if they experienced high levels of stress, Time

Positive Thinking Is Contagious Too!

    Fortunately, the study also found that healthier modes of thinking were equally
contagious, with the capacity to make a roommate adopt a moreoptimistic outlook
as well. More than likely, you didn’t need a study to takenotice of this. Most people
will at some point or another have encounteredsomeone in their life that either made
you feel more positive or negative,simply by spending time with them.

    A question they could not answer, however, was what the determining factor
was that decided which roommate would adopt a thinking style more closely
mirroring that of the other. Why are some people’s thinking styles more likely
to dominate, rather than be influenced?

        Such information could enhance the current findings and contribute to
new ways of treating and preventing depression, Time writes. The results
suggest that depressive thinking styles can still be influenced during young
adulthood so this risk factor can be minimized even if it has already
developed during high school or earlier. Targeting ruminative thinking might
also enhance therapy.

        The therapist could assess if people in the patient’s life are modeling and
providing adaptive cognitive feedback about stress and negativelife events,
says Haeffel. The therapist could then provide those withnegative thinking
styles with information about the contagion effect alongwith training that
would help them identify negative thought patterns andprovide examples of
more adaptive ways of thinking.

The Slow Opening Up to 'Spiritual Science'

    In 1993, only three of the United States' 125 medical schools offered any
sort of course work exploring the area of spirituality and medicine. Today,
over 90 of these medical schools have formal courses where they explore
randomized controlled studies and the effects of spiritual practices on
longevity and health outcomes a sure sign that what was once considered taboo
is beginning to receive the discussion and serious investigation it deserves.

Dr. Larry Dossey has written 11 books primarily focused on consciousness,
spirituality, and the impact of spirituality on your health, including the
book Healing Words: The Power of Prayer and the Practice of Medicine.

        "I think we're opening up," Dossey said when I interviewed him, three
years ago. "I'm sure you remember, about 40 years ago when meditation burst
upon the scene in medicine, it was put down. It was called California Woo woo.

Nobody wanted to have anything to do with it. But now nobody raises an eye
about meditation and yoga, even in medicine. We're in the same place with
spirituality that we were with meditation about 20 years ago. People know you
can't ignore it. The correlation between spiritual practice and health
outcomes is just too strong.

        For example, the data shows that people who follow some sort of
spiritual path in their life live on average seven to 13 years longer than
people who do not follow a spiritual practice... We have a huge spectrum of
data that shows, I think compellingly, that your thoughts really matter when
it comes to getting well."

    Most ancient cultures knew this, and there are few lines dividing spirituality;
the mind, and medicine in these cultures. Ironically, modern science now allows
us to rediscover these ancient truths, which fell by the wayside with the advent
of medical science and its narrow focus on individualparts as opposed to
investigating the connections within the whole. Going backto where we started,
David Rosmarin, the lead researcher of the featured studyin which those with
a stronger faith in God experienced far better treatment
outcomes for their depression, said:

        "Given the prevalence of religious belief in the United States -- more
than 90 percent of the population -- these findings are important in that they
highlight the clinical implications of spiritual life. I hope that this work
will lead to larger studies and increased funding in order to help as many
people as possible."

The Rise of Energy Psychology

    Many people avoid energy psychology as they believe it is an alternative
form of New Age spirituality, yet nothing could be further from the truth. It
is merely an advanced tool that can effectively address some of the
psychological short circuiting that occurs in emotional illnesses. It is not
any competition at all with any religion but merely an effective resource you
can use with whatever spiritual belief you have.

    My favorite technique for this is the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT),
which is the largest and most popular version of energy psychology.

    EFT was developed in the 1990s by Gary Craig, a Stanford engineering
graduate specializing in healing and self-improvement. It’s akin to
acupuncture, which is based on the concept that a vital energy flows through
your body along invisible pathways known as meridians. EFT stimulates
different energy meridian points in your body by tapping them with your
fingertips, while simultaneously using custom-made verbal affirmations. This
can be done alone or under the supervision of a qualified therapist. By doing
so, you help your body eliminate emotional scarring and reprogram the way your
body responds to emotional stressors.

 Research Backs the Use of EFT for Depression

    I have been a fan of energy psychology for many years, having witnessed
its effectiveness in my medical practice and in my own personal life. However,
studies have been few and far between as science has been trying to catch up
with clinical experience. That has finally started to change. Several studies

have been published in the last few years, showing just how safe and effective
EFT really is.

    For example, the following three studies show remarkable progress in a
very short amount of time for people with a history of trauma:

        A 2009 study of 16 institutionalized adolescent boys with histories
of physical or psychological abuse showed substantially decreased intensity of
traumatic memories after just ONE session of EFT.

        An EFT study involving 30 moderately to severely depressed college
students was conducted. The depressed students were given four 90-minute EFT
sessions. Students who received EFT showed significantly less depression than
the control group when evaluated three weeks later.

        In a study of 100 veterans with severe PTSD0 (Iraq Vets Stress Project),
after just six one-hour EFT sessions, 90 percent of the veterans had such a
reduction in symptoms that they no longer met the clinical criteriafor PTSD;
60 percent no longer met PTSD criteria after only three EFT sessions. At the
three-month follow-up, the gains remained stable, suggesting lasting and
potentially permanent resolution of the problem.

 Other Lifestyle Changes to Consider for Depression

    I strongly believe that energy psychology is one of the most powerful
tools for resolving emotional issues, and I think strengthening your faith can
be a very important aspect of mental and emotional health as well. The
effectiveness of any energy psychology technique will be significantly
improved if you combine it with the following:

        Dramatically decreasing your consumption of sugar (particularly
fructose), grains, and processed foods. (In addition to being high in sugar
and grains, processed foods also contain a variety of additives that can
affect your brain function and mental state, especially artificial

        Getting adequate vitamin B12. Vitamin B12 deficiency can contribute to
depression and affects one in four people.

        Optimizing your vitamin D levels, ideally through regular sun exposure.
Vitamin D is very important for your mood. One study found thatpeople with
the lowest levels of vitamin D were 11 times more prone to be depressed than
those who had normal levels.

        Getting plenty of animal-based omega-3 fats. Omega-3 fats are crucial
for good brain function and mental health, and most people don’t get enough
from diet alone. So make sure you take a high-quality omega-3 fat, such as
krill oil.

        Evaluating your salt intake. Sodium deficiency actually creates symptoms
that are very much like those of depression. Make sure you do NOT use
processed salt (regular table salt), however. You’ll want to use an all
natural, unprocessed salt like Himalayan salt, which contains more than 80
different micronutrients.

        Getting adequate daily exercise. Exercise is one of the best-kept
secrets to preventing depression.

Thank You Dr. Mercola

  God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Teen Misuse And Abuse Of Prescription Drugs!


         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

         Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

    World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
    Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

Survey Finds Teen Misuse And Abuse Of Prescription Drugs 

Up 33 Percent Since 2008

By Dr. Mercola

    One in four teens has misused a prescription drug at least once in their
lifetime, according to new survey results from the partnership at
and the MetLife Foundation.

    This represents a 33 percent increase in the past five years!

    Among one of the most commonly abused class of drugs are stimulants like
Ritalin and Adderall, of which one in eight teens (13 percent) said they had
taken even though it wasn’t prescribed to them.

    Prescription drugs don’t hold the same stigma as illegal recreational
drugs, even though they can be just as deadly, leading teens to regard them as
a safe way to get high.

    In many cases, parents only add to this assumption, not only because they
may take multiple prescription drugs themselves but also, as the survey
reported, because close to one-third of parents believe prescription
stimulants can improve their teen’s academic performance.

One in Six Parents Believe Prescription Drugs Give a Safer 

'High' Than Street Drugs

    Another shocking belief held by one in six parents was that using
prescription drugs to get high is safer than using street drugs. This might
explain why 86 percent of teens said their parents had not talked to them
about the risks of abusing prescription drugs. In fact, it’s often the
parents’ own medicine cabinets that become their children’s drug dealers

    Some teens even describe having Skittles parties, where they combine a mix
of pills they took from their parent’s medicine cabinet into one big bowl,
then take a few just for fun.

    Sadly, some teens pay for this one bad decision with their lives. Drug
fatalities more than doubled among teens and young adults between 2000 and
2008, and these drug-induced fatalities are not being driven by illegal street

    Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that
the most commonly abused prescription drugs like OxyContin, Vicodin, Xanax and
Soma now cause more deaths than heroin and cocaine combined. As written in the
Baltimore Sun:

        "According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy,
prescription drugs are second to marijuana as the drug of choice for today's
teens. In fact, seven of the top 10 drugs used by 12th-graders were
prescription drugs.

        More than 40 percent of high school seniors reported that painkillers
are 'fairly' or 'very' easy to get. They also reported that they believed that
if they were to get caught, there was less shame attached to the use of
prescription drugs than to street drugs. This mirrors the perceptions of their
parents, who when queried said that they felt prescription drugs were a safer
alternative to drugs typically sold by a drug dealer."

There’s Nothing Safe About Prescription Drug Abuse

    If you have a teenager or pre-teen in your life that you care about,
please make it a point to sit down and talk to them about the dangers of
taking prescription drugs just for fun. Far from being safer than illegal
street drugs, they can sometimes kill in just one pill.

    Be sure to let them in on this simple fact: in many cases there's no
difference between a recreational street drug and a prescription drug. For
example, hydrocodone, a prescription opiate, is synthetic heroin. It's
indistinguishable from any other heroine as far as your brain and body is
concerned. So, if you're hooked on hydrocodone, you are in fact a good-old-
fashioned heroin addict.

    Worse, pain-killing drugs like fentanyl are actually 100 times more potent
than natural opioids like morphine, making the addictive potential and side
effects associated with prescription drug use much higher. Among the most
commonly abused prescription medications, along with their risks, which you
can share with your teen, include:

    Opioids (Painkillers)

        Morphine, codeine, oxycodone, hydrocodone and fentanyl all fall into
this category. These drugs are not only addictive, they can also lead to
slowed breathing and death if too much is taken.


        These include drugs such as Ritalin, Concerta and Adderall (the latter
of which actually contains amphetamine, known and sold on the street as
"speed" or "crank"), which are often used to teat ADHD, narcolepsy and even
sometimes depression. Along with being highly addictive, stimulants sometimes
lead to feelings of hostility and paranoia, along with risks like irregular
heartbeat, heart failure and seizures.

        When a stimulant is combined with another medication, such as an
over-the-counter cold medicine that contains a decongestant, it can cause
dangerously high blood pressure or irregular heart rhythms.


        Used to treat anxiety and sleep disorders, medications such as Valium,
Xanax, Ambien, and Sonata are also addictive, and cause side effects like
confusion, drowsiness and impaired coordination. This can be especially risky
among teens if they then get behind the wheel to drive, as it increases the
risk of accidents. Further, if these drugs are combined with alcohol or pain
medications, the results can be deadly.

    In the Popular Science infographic above, you can see rankings of some of
the deadliest drugs in the US, according to data from the CDC. What is
striking about this graphic is not only the steady rise in drug-related
deaths, but also the fact that close to 60 percent of the drug overdose deaths
involve pharmaceutical drugs such as opioids (oxycodone, hydrocodone, and
methadone), anti-anxiety drugs, antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs the
very same drugs often preferred by teens for a safer high.

Politicians Are Worried About Soda  But What About Prescription Drugs?

    Soda taxes and other measures to lower soda consumption is a hot topic
among politicians. Obviously, helping teens to drink less soda is an admirable
and important public health goal, but what about the abuse of prescription
drugs? One American dies every 19 minutes from an accidental prescription drug
overdose, a phenomenon now being described as “the biggest man-made epidemic
in the United States. Yet, this is a soaring public health epidemic that
receives far too little attention from the media and lawmakers alike.

    Unfortunately, we’re living in an era when the drug industry is praised
and revered for their life-saving medications, when in reality even their
proper use often takes lives unnecessarily. Drugs are known to cause well over
125,000 deaths per year in the US when taken correctly as prescribed  and
still the FDA allows fast-track approvals and countless new additions of
poorly tested drugs to the marketplace that must later be withdrawn due to
their lethal consequences.

    This FDA approval makes teens believe that taking a few pills here and
there is no big deal, and parents add to this flawed belief by often giving
medications to their kids when they’re not really necessary  a practice that
often starts at a very young age.

Nearly Half of Parents Give Cold Meds to Kids When They Shouldn’t

    In children under the age of 4, common over-the-counter cough and cold
medications can lead to allergic reactions, increased heart rate, slow
breathing, confusion, hallucinations, drowsiness, sleeplessness, convulsions,
nausea and constipation. This is why, since 2008, labels on these drugs state
that they’re not intended for children under 4. Yet, according to a new
survey, the University of Michigan C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll
on Children's Health, more than 40 percent of US parents give these cough and
cold medications to their children aged 3 and younger.8

    There is a common perception that if you’re coughing, sneezing or have a
low-grade fever, you must take a medication to get rid of it. In reality,
coughing and sneezing are tools your body uses to get rid of viruses and
irritants, and fever also helps to kill bacteria and viruses.

    So if you take a drug to stop these natural protections, you are actually
stopping your body’s healing process -- and in the long run it will likely
take you even longer to feel better. That, combined with the serious risks
these drugs can pose to children, makes a strong case against their use  yet
many parents still reach for such medications at the first hint of a sniffle.

For kids, this sends the message that drugs are necessary to make you feel
better a belief they may keep when they reach their teenage years

Novartis Drug Company Being Sued for Illegal Kickback Scheme

    You probably wouldn’t trust that a drug dealer on the street had your best
interests at heart  you would assume they’re mostly interested in making a
profit. But make no mistake  the leading pharmaceutical companies are also
among the largest corporate criminals in the world, behaving as if they are
little more than white-collar drug dealers.

    In one of the most recent examples, the US government sued the drug
company Novartis for giving pharmacies discounts and rebates to switch kidney
transplant patients from competitors’ drugs to their own anti-rejection drug
Myfortic. Medicare and Medicaid reportedly paid tens of millions of dollars in
reimbursements to the pharmacies as a result of the illegal kickback scheme,
which has reportedly been going on since 2005.

    This is not an isolated incident, either. A 2010 study analyzed trends in
criminal and civil actions against drug companies, and revealed that the drug
industry is the biggest defrauder of the federal government under the False
Claims Act.9 Despite stiffer financial penalties, criminal activity has
increased dramatically in recent years. These white-collar criminals are the
same ones behind the supposedly safe medications sitting in your medicine
cabinet; if they’re willing to defraud the federal government, what makes you
think they’re not willing to defraud you, too?

12 Signs Your Teen May be Abusing Prescription Drugs

    Prescription drug abuse often goes unnoticed by parents until it’s too
late, so be sure to keep a close eye out for the following signs that your
teen may be abusing prescription drugs:

Changes in sleeping habits or energy level    
Changes in mood or personality Changes in personal hygiene or appearance
Changes in friends    
Loss of appetite    
Loss of appetite
Changes in grades or dedication to schoolwork
Constricted eye pupils (pinpoint pupils), which may be a sign of opiate use    

Poor decision making    
Restlessness or impulsive behavior
Missing medications around your home    
Loss of interest in activities, sports, etc.    
Sudden weight loss

Thank You Dr. Mercola

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Monday, December 16, 2013

But it’s not all bad news...


         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

         Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!

    World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
    Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated

Articl #5


But it’s not all bad news

A group of forward-thinking doctors have been working to find real solutions
to heart disease  solutions that repair the actual cause of it.

One of these doctors is a New England-based physician.  And he uncovered a
nutrient solution that could save your life!

Let me tell you the true story of one of his patients

An Amazing Recovery From Heart Disease

Mary was 79. She had congestive heart failure. When she was admitted to a
community hospital near her home in Connecticut she was in a coma.  She
couldn’t even breathe on her own.

Doctors told her son Bob that he should pull the plug.

He didn’t listen.  Instead Bob reached out to every cardiologist he could
find. Finally he found the doctor who came up with this surprising solution.

After just three days, Mary came out of her coma

Within 10 days, she was off the ventilator

On day 14 she was sitting upright in a wheelchair, using only supplemental

Pretty soon after that she was back in the comfort of her own home baking,
cleaning, even rearranging her collection of 3,000 books. All on her own.

It sounds like nothing short of divine intervention, I know.

But the most amazing part of the story is that this doctor cured Mary using a
single, natural nutrient!

Stop and think: if one nutrient pulled a 79-year-old woman from the brink of
death, imagine what it can do for you.

Of course you don’t have to imagine.

You could begin using this miracle compound today to help keep your heart
pumping strong for years to come.

And it’s all thanks to this courageous doctor who actually found not one, but
four heart boosters. Ones that restore energy, reverse heart disease, and give
his patients a second chance at living their best lives.

    In fact, he says many of them who were awaiting heart transplants actually
took themselves off the list and went back to a normal, active lifestyle!

And before too long, another forward-thinking physician followed the same
course of treatment for his patients. And he was stunned.

The number of patients that returned to him for heart problems dropped  to
almost zero!

Again, you may be wondering why you haven’t heard about this remarkable
solution. And I’d have to repeat the answer: Because the mainstream medical
community makes more money by keeping you in the dark.

The truth is this: treating a sick heart with drugs doesn’t cure heart
disease. You just continue to suffer the symptoms for years and years.

Meanwhile the huge cost of your medications makes Big Pharma richer and

Reclaim Your Healthy Heart with These Four Amazing Micronutrients

What this pioneering cardiologist developed is a safe and simple natural
solution that can halt heart disease in its tracks. More important, it can
give you back the energy and vitality of a healthy heart.

This four-nutrient cocktail goes to work immediately, fueling and protecting
your heart  and your entire body.

    Micronutrient #1  Providing the Spark: This vitamin-like compound is
absolutely crucial for heart health. There’s just one huge problem your body
slows down making it after age 40. It’s no coincidence your risk for heart
disease increases exponentially right about that time too.

    If you’re already on prescription meds for your heart, this is one
supplement you’ll want to consider adding to your diet immediately. We’ll tell
you why.

    Micronutrient #2  Turning Fat into Fuel: This probably goes against
everything you’ve heard about keeping your heart healthy. But red meat could
help you fight heart disease! That’s right. There’s an important nutrient
found in red meat and dairy. And this compound actually turns fat into fuel to
help keep your heart beating 60 to 100 times every minute. It may also help
keep blood vessels open. With better blood flow, oxygen gets delivered to the
heart. And a good oxygen supply allows the heart to work more efficiently.

    Micronutrient #3  Sweetness in Action: Chances are, you haven’t even heard
of this nutrient yet.  But I don’t expect it to stay quiet for long. I mean,
who would have thought that sugar of any kind could be good for your heart? 

It is. But I’m not just talking about any sugar.  This one is produced by the
body and naturally boosts muscle energy.

    Micronutrient #4  The Rescue Mineral: Every organ in the body  especially
the heart  needs this mineral. But the body doesn’t make it naturally. And
that’s too bad.  Because it helps relax blood vessels, which leads to healthy
blood pressure.  

    Discover what it is and  just as important  the two everyday foods that
could be draining your body of this important nutrient.

A Breakthrough in the Treatment of Heart Disease Each of the four nutrients
offers tremendous benefits. But combined?  They have an even more powerful
effect. One that can return you to a healthful, energized, and active

This is all detailed in the report I want to send you. It’s called A

Breakthrough in the Treatment of Heart Disease. It explains Mary’s
cure and details everything you need to know about these miracle nutrients.
This is exactly the kind of “off-the-grid research and insight you can expect
from our team.

And you can discover all of these breakthrough cures and find out where
they're available today.

When you become a subscriber, you'll immediately receive three free e-books on
these important medical breakthroughs.

Extreme Healing: Seven Weapons to Wipe Out Cancer Naturally.  Cure Diabetes
in 3 Weeks and A Breakthrough in the Treatment of Heart Disease.

And of course, as a member of Natural Health Dossier you're going to get much
more than just these reports.

You’ll also get a new, detailed issue every month, and access to all of our

Here you’ll discover hidden health secrets like:

    The simple tricks that practically reversed one man’s clinical dementia—
that are even more powerful if you use them to keep your own brain young,
sharp and healthy.  (And find out what a shocking study of over 600 old nuns
tells us about Alzheimer’s and brain aging.)

    The hidden culprits zapping you of your manhood. The CDC even admits these
testosterone-killers rob you of the things that make a man a man, as one of
their scientists put it. You’ll discover what they are and how to possibly
reverse the damage.

    How the founder of INH actually made himself younger. He watched his own
biological clock reverse by 11 years.  And his secret lies in a mega-
supplement that keeps him in better shape than most men half his age. But
that’s only part of it.

    The one simple vitamin that could cut the risk of heart disease by 40%.

    The plant substance that could reduce liver tumors by up to 64% that you
can easily incorporate into your diet.

    Simple weight loss tricks you can do every day without the expensive
gimmicks (like taking 5-HTP)

Now if you're like most of our members, you do everything in your power to
stay ahead of your health. You may spend hours upon hours scouring health
forums online. Or you may subscribe to three or more free health e-zines.

Since you've followed along this far, you're already more aware of advanced
and effective cures than many working doctors.

This is the kind of information that only Natural Health Dossier subscribers
have access to.

As each monthly issue comes out... and with each urgent bonus report... the
library grows. One you’ll refer to again and again.

The most recent health breakthroughs, with actual scientific results, are only
available in medical journals. Subscriptions to these journals cost hundreds
of dollars a year.

But most of that research is funded by tax dollars. So we essentially pay for
the research, then we're charged hundreds of dollars to discover the results!

That's not only ridiculous, it’s just plain unfair.

In Good Health,

Angela Salerno
Angela Salerno
Publisher, Natural Health Dossier

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.