Monday, February 17, 2014

Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments..."Integrity".

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.


              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...

by R. Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

The Key Issue..."Integrity".

The issue of treating cancer has far more to do with integrity than
it does with science. In fact, after several years of researching
this very issue, it is clear to this author that treating cancer
today has absolutely nothing to do with science. Nothing at all.

Had scientists embraced the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s, and
refined it as future discoveries in natural medicine were made,
cancer would have been a footnote in the history books written
in the 1940s.

In the 1930s, Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, also discovered a
cure for cancer using an electromedicine frequency generator
which is commonly called a Rife Machine. He was shut down and his
technology was lost to the world for more than 70 years.

In fact, this website endorses a potent cancer treatment which is
primarily a combination of the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s and
the restoration of the Rife Machine of the 1930s. While this is
a potent treatment, it is not the most potent treatment this website

The late Dr. Bob Beck, a PhD in physics, spent 40 years of his life
working in electromedicine. Dr. Beck took the information he learned
from the research of a Dr. Kalli and a Dr. Lyman and he developed a
cure for AIDS.

Here is a quote from Dr. Bob Beck about Kaali and Lyman:

    When I looked into Dr. Kaali’s work [Patent #5188738 describes
a cure for AIDS/HIV found at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine
in 1990], I decided to go ahead and fund it. We found that it worked
all of the time [at curing AIDS/HIV]. For two and a half years, we
gave full credit for this invention to Dr. Kaali, whose name is on
the patent. Then I discovered that there was a long history of this
technology. We followed a trail of these patents back 107 years! We
found a patent, #4665898, that cured all cancer, dated May 19,
1987. Why has this been suppressed? Why hasn’t your doctor told you
about an absolutely proven, established cure for cancer? The answer
is that doctors get $375,000 per patient for surgery, chemotherapy,
x-ray, hospital stays, doctors and anesthesiologists.

 This is the official statistic from the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Unfortunately, the medical patient cured is a customer lost.A lot
of people say, Aren’t you infringing on others’ patents? In the
beginning, I was nervous, but when I found this technology had been
discovered and rediscovered for 107 years, I changed my mind. Now I
am broadcasting it from the rooftops. Still, it is very touchy. It’s
rocking the pharmaceutical, surgical and diagnostic industries. But
I really feel that I have been called to do this. I have had people
come to my door with guns. I have been threatened and chased. But I
think God wants this information out. I feel it is my mission to give
people back to themselves, to deliver them from these vested interests,
these [medical] priesthoods that are taking everyone’s money. I am not
charging a nickel.

Bob Beck, PhD, Interviewed by Kenneth and Dee Burke

As another example, in 1976, two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling,
PhD, and an associate, Ewan Cameron, M.D., did a published scientific
study in Scotland that resulted in proving that Vitamin C, given by
I.V., of 10 grams a day, could extend the average length of time a
terminal cancer patient lives by ten times or more as compared to
orthodox cancer treatments.

Had the medical community had any integrity, they would have quickly
replicated his study, come to the same conclusion (if they did exactly
what he did), and would have quickly started giving every cancer patient,
terminal or otherwise, 10 grams of Vitamin C by I.V. every day.

But that is not what happened.

What really happened is that 3 studies were done at the Mayo Clinic,
all of which were directly a reaction to the Pauling/Cameron study.
However, these studies were not designed to replicate the Pauling/
Cameron research. Instead they were designed to AVOID replicating
the Pauling/Cameron protocol, AVOID their patient mix, and AVOID their
statistical methods. Obviously, if you don’t follow the same protocol,
you won’t get the same results. And they didn’t.

Here is what the American Cancer Society (ACS) says about this issue:

    The Pauling study has been criticized by the NCI [National Cancer
Institute, a division of the NIH or National Institutes of Health,
a U.S. government agency] for being poorly designed, and subsequent
studies done at the Mayo Clinic found that advanced cancer patients
given the same dosage of vitamin C did not survive any longer than
those not given the supplement. However, the Mayo Clinic trials have
also been criticized for not fully addressing all the issues related
to the effects of vitamin C, which still left questions about its
effectiveness in the treatment of cancer.

The ACS would have been insane to challenge the integrity of Linus
Pauling (one of his Nobel Prizes was the Nobel Peace Prize, the other
was in chemistry). So they quote the totally corrupt NIH (Note: 500 NIH
employees were recently caught taking bribes from the pharmaceutical
industry, which they called outside consulting fees) and state that
a world famous chemist, and two-time Nobel Prize winner, doesn’t know
how to design a scientific study!!

But they also admit that the Mayo clinic did not use the same protocol
as Pauling and Cameron. So if there are still left questions, why hasn’t
the ACS used their annual hundreds of millions of dollars of income, and
their political clout, to set the record straight and replicate the
study as originally done? It has been more 40 years since the original
study, yet no one in orthodox medicine, with their billions of dollars
in research money, not even the ACS or NIH, has replicated the Pauling/
Cameron study.

It appears that extending the life expectancy of terminal cancer patients
six-fold, using natural substances, is not important to orthodox medicine.

In fact, two other studies did replicate the Pauling/Cameron study
far more closely than did the Mayo Clinic. Both of these studies
verified the Pauling/Cameron results. For more information, see:

Article from eBook: Case Study of Scientific Corruption

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

No comments:

Post a Comment