Saturday, September 14, 2013

Dealing with Advanced Cancer.


                                       SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer

Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw                    

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


This is the "Big Picture" 


of dealing with advanced cancer. Itprovides the overview of what the patient
needs to understand about treating cancer.

What Causes Cancer


Every adult has some cancer cells in their body and they routinely develop
new cancer cells. This is usually no big deal because the immune system is
usually perfectly capable of dealing with a routine number of cancer cells.

A person "gets cancer" when there is an imbalance between the number of new
cancer cells and the strength of the immune system. Cancer is caused by an
abnormally high number of cancer cells being formed or the immune system is
weaker than it should be, or both.

Thus, when you see some substance being mentioned as a "cause of cancer," it
is almost always something which either causes more than a normal number of
cancer cells to form (e.g. exposure to asbestos) or suppresses the immune
system (e.g. excessive alcohol consumption). In other words, the things that
"cause cancer" disrupt the balance between the number of cancer cells in the
body and the strength of the immune system.

However, neither the number of cancer cells in a person's body nor the
strength of their immune system has anything to do with the actual formation
of new cancer cells.

We can compare this to an infestation of cockroaches in your basement. You
hire an exterminator to get rid of cockroaches (e.g. your immune system) and
the number of cockroaches in your basement is a function of how fast they
breed (e.g. the number of cancer cells in your body).

But neither your exterminator, nor how fast the cockroaches breed has
anything to do with why the cockroaches got inside your basement in the first
place.

Learning what causes a normal cell to revert into a cancer cell can be
equated to learning how the cockroaches originally got inside your basement.
Once inside your basement, the battle between the exterminator and the
breeding begins.

You might wonder why knowing how a normal cell changes into a cancer cell is
important. It is important because cancer treatments can be designed to
revert cancer cells back into normal cells.

But also, it is important to understand because an understanding of how
cancer cells form in the first place can help you understand why some
alternative cancer treatments are better than others.

How Normal Cells Revert Into Cancer Cells


The formation of new cancer cells is caused by a very special type of microbe
called a "cell wall deficient bacteria." This bacteria is highly pleomorphic,
meaning the bacteria can be smaller than a virus (e.g. a somatid state) or as
large as an amoeba (e.g. the size of a trichomonad). This bacteria frequently
changes it shape and its size. It can do this because it is "cell wall
deficient."

These bacteria, which can be "filterable" (i.e. as small as a virus), can
actually get inside of a normal cell. Once inside a normal cell it blocks the
formation of ATP energy inside the mitochondria and this is what turns the
cell "cancerous." It is this microbe which is actually what causes cancer
cells to form. See this article for details on how cancer cells form:

The Theory of Cancer


Thus, we have two main players in the formation of cancer:

1) The cell wall deficient, highly pleormorphic bacteria, which is actually
what causes cancer cells to form and determines how many cancer cells there
are, and
2) the strength of the immune system to deal with the quantity of cancer
cells.

Thus, curing cancer can be perceived as doing one or more of three things:


1) Killing the microbes inside the cancer cells, which allows the cancer
cells to revert into normal, non-cancerous cells (this reduces the number of
cancer cells),
2) Killing cancer cells (which also reduces the number of cancer cells),
and/or
3) Building the immune system.

Of course, there are multiple ways of doing each of these things.


But there are other problems in treating cancer. A very high number of cancer
cells in the body can do severe damage to the non-cancerous cells because
cancer cells literally "steal" glucose and nutrients from non-cancerous
cells.

We need to add the protection of non-cancerous cells and key organs to
our list of things we need to do.

Another problem for cancer patients is that 95% of all cancer patients who
seek out alternative cancer treatments have had extensive chemotherapy,
radiation and surgery. All three of these things also do severe damage to the
non-cancerous cells, the ability to digest foods and supplements and can
damage the immune system.

Actually, most cancer patients die because of the damage to non-cancerous
cells and/or key organs.

Thus, an advanced cancer patient has a very, very weak immune system, a high
number of cancer cells, and highly damaged non-cancerous cells.

In fact, the immune system is so weak that for advanced cancer patients there
is usually not enough time to try to strengthen the immune system to the
point it becomes a factor in the treatment. However, it is necessary to build
the immune system for the long term.

There are many other factors 


(e.g. surgery to the stomach which interferes with the bodies ability to digest
foods, as one example), but for now these are the key factors. Thus, when a
person first seeks out alternative cancer treatments, there are almost certainly
four things to deal with:
1) A very high number of cancer cells,
2) A very, very weak immune system,
3) Severe damage to non-cancerous cells due to the high number of cancer
cells and orthodox cancer treatments, and
4) A significant level of cachexia (i.e. the lactic acid cycle).

Treating Stage IV Cancer


Since beginning to research alternative cancer treatments in mid-2002, my
approach to treating cancer has changed several times. This is due to both
feedback from cancer patients, feedback from vendors who work with cancer
patients and feedback from other cancer researchers.

Before going on let me say that treating a typical newly diagnosed cancer
patient versus treated an advanced cancer patient who has had extensive
chemotherapy and other orthodox treatments is like comparing flying a model
airplane to flying a B2 bomber!!

For example, when treating a typical newly diagnosed cancer patient,
strengthening the immune system is critical because obviously the balance
between the immune system and the number of cancer cells is out of balance.

However, for advanced cancer patients the immune system is usually irrelevant
for the first few months of treatment. You might wonder why. The reason is
that a person who has been on extensive orthodox cancer treatments doesn't
have an immune system. The first priority is keeping the person alive. This
involves safely killing cancer cells and strengthening the non-cancerous
cells and protecting the organs.

Another way to understand the treatment of cancer 


is to compare treating cancer to putting out a house fire. For example, suppose
an electrical appliance in your house catches on fire. As long as only the electrical
appliance is on fire, the fire is generally easy to put out. For example, a fire
extinguisher can put this kind of fire out without the need to use a garden hose
or call the fire department.

This scenario can be compared to most cancer patients when they are first
diagnosed. Scores of alternative cancer treatments can cure most cancer cases
when they are first diagnosed.

However, just because someone is recently diagnosed does not mean they have a
simple situation. Some types of cancer need a fire hose right from the
beginning, either because they are a dangerous type of cancer (e.g. squamous
cell carcinoma) or the patient was diagnosed at a late stage.

For those who have had some chemotherapy and radiation, we can compare it to
at least a fire which has spread to some kitchen cabinets. In this case a
fire extinguisher may not be adequate to put the fire out. A garden hose may
be necessary and the person may call the fire department just in case the
garden hose is not adequate.

The reality is that if you are reading this article, and you have cancer, or
if you are the caregiver of a cancer patient, you or the cancer patient has
probably been through extensive orthodox cancer treatments plus have lost
many months of treatment time.

This might be compared to a house fire where the fire is already consuming
two or more rooms and the roof is on fire. In this case a garden hose is no
longer adequate. It is necessary to call the fire department immediately.

This, in fact, is the situation of more than 95% of all cancer patients who
seek out alternative cancer treatments!!

Think for a moment about an extensive house fire. The more extensive the fire
is, the faster the fire is spreading.

Likewise, the more cancer a cancer patient has, the faster it is spreading,
simply by virtue of the number of cancer cells that exist and are dividing.
However, just like a fire in some houses will spread faster than other houses
(for example, a fire in a wood frame house will spread faster than a fire in
a concrete and metal frame house), some types of cancer spread faster than
others.

Thus, to treat advanced cancer you need to know several things:


1) How much cancer is in the body,
2) Where are the key locations of the cancer (e.g. brain, lungs, bones,
etc.),
3) What kind of cancer is it (e.g. is it spreading quickly based on the type
of cancer),
4) What are the tools you have to work with to "put it out."

The last item might be somewhat confusing to the reader. Can't any cancer
patient choose any of the "Stage IV" alternative cancer treatments, meaning
the fire hoses? The answer is absolutely NO!

There are many situations where a specific treatment would be dangerous to
use. For example, in some cancer cases the slightest swelling of a tumor,
even temporary swelling, may cause a serious and even fatal result. Thus, it
is critical to know how much swelling and inflammation can be tolerated and
which alternative cancer treatments may cause temporary swelling and
inflammation. This is one example of why some alternative cancer treatments
should not be used in certain situations, or should be used only under expert
supervision.

As another example, with lung cancer (including cancer that has spread to the
lungs), if there is congestion, this is almost always the primary concern
when treating the cancer, no matter what other concerns there may be. If the
cancer patient has to go on oxygen, in the past it was almost impossible to
save the patient because of how far the cancer had already spread. However,
new alternative cancer treatments, such as the Cellect-Budwig protocol, have
overcome the cancer of people who were on 18 liters of oxygen a day because
they are powerful treatments and the treatment did not add to the existing
congestion!!

Another issue is whether the patient is taking any prescription drugs,
including chemotherapy or any other prescription drugs. Some alternative
cancer treatments cannot be used while a cancer patient is still taking any
type of prescription drugs.

Brain cancer can also be a number one priority. If there is brain swelling it
can slow the heart rate down even to the point the heart completely stops
beating.

Another issue is bone cancer (including cancer that has spread to the bones).

When bones become brittle and start breaking it can create severe depression
in the cancer patient, especially if the bones that are breaking are in the
spine. This fact will elevate the importance to treat the bone cancer first
(though lung cancer that includes congestion is almost always the highest
priority).

As other examples, some cancer patients cannot digest or consume supplements
(e.g. they are fed through an I.V.). Many alternative cancer treatments
require the ability to take and digest supplements.

The point is that there are many issues that affect which alternative cancer
treatment(s) can be used in a specific case and which cannot be used. Once
this list is known, it then becomes an issue of which one is the best, based
on the priorities.

In one individual case, even the slightest swelling would cause potentially
fatal problems for the patient (a tumor was wrapped around an artery). This
alone eliminated almost all alternative cancer treatments because almost all
alternative cancer treatments create temporary swelling and congestion.

However, the man also had had 5 feet of his intestines removed, thus he could
not digest supplements very well (fortunately he was not on a feeding tube).

That eliminated some of the remaining treatments. But he was also on several
powerful pain killers. That eliminated the rest of the powerful alternative
cancer treatments. When the analysis was done, there was not a single
powerful alternative cancer treatment that was available to him. The only
option was to pick a treatment that did not cause any swelling, modify it
slightly so more of it could be digested, then add a couple of treatments
that are rarely used to insure there was not even the slightest swelling.

There are many factors to consider before a treatment can be chosen. This
article will discuss many of these issues, and the chapters will link to
other articles, in some cases, which go into more detail if they apply to
your situation.

These things are mentioned to prepare you for the fact you are going to have
to do a lot of reading. While it is always best to work with a vendor or a
clinic, you should do your homework before (and after) you pick a vendor!!

A vendor will probably take your business even if they are not the best
choice for your situation. This is because the vendor probably doesn't know
about other alternative cancer treatments (i.e. they may only know about
their treatment) and probably doesn't know which treatment is best for your
situation. They will just do the best they can with their treatment. It is up
to the patient or their caregiver to do the best they can to pick the best
treatment the first time. The purpose of this article is to help them do just
that.

Also be aware that due to massive persecution of alternative medicine by the
FDA, vendors are no longer allowed to tell you how effective their treatment
may be in your situation.

For example, a vendor may know that his or her treatment will cure your
cancer, based on extensive experience. However, this vendor may have to do a
"tap dance" with their words to make sure they do not say things the FDA
doesn't want them to say.

The goal of the FDA is to separate the truth (i.e. how potent an 

alternative cancer treatment or device may be) from the product.


This is not because the FDA cares about your health or survival, it is
because the FDA executives want to retire to a vastly profitable job funded
directly or indirectly by the pharmaceutical industry.

Because there are unscrupulous vendors and because the honest vendors cannot
tell you everything and cannot use certain words, it is really up to the
patient, or their caregiver, to do the bulk of the research.


             Continued

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Friday, September 13, 2013

There are Hundreds of Alternative Cancer Treatments.



                            SPONSORS


         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer

Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw
                    

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


           Continued From Last Post


While there are hundreds of alternative cancer treatments,


it takes an expert, and the right alternative cancer treatments,
to give an advanced cancer patient real hope for survival.

The cure rate on advanced cancer patients, who have already had extensive
orthodox treatments, is about 50% and only the best experts (such as those in
clinics or the best of the telephone support consultants) can achieve that
kind of cure rate. Curing these kinds of patients is literally a race against
time. It is necessary to "get it right" the first time and then go on a long
term treatment to restore the immune system, repair the damage to the colon
and stomach and safely kill newly forming cancer cells.

A Very Key Point


Just because someone says they know how to cure cancer does not mean they
have a clue what they are doing. Some people know what they are doing, other
people are good people who mean well but don't know what they are doing and
other people are just seeking high profits.

Thus, a cancer patient not only has to overcome the massively huge hurdle of
the false claims of orthodox medicine, they also must wind their way through
the false claims of many people in alternative medicine, much of it unintentional.

I know many of the people in alternative medicine who know how to ure cancer
and can achieve the 50% benchmark on advanced cancer patients. But there are
many others, who do know what they are talking about.

However, even though I may not know them personally, I do know what they
claim to use as cancer treatments. And I do understand cancer treatments
enough that I know what works and what doesn't work.

How Alternative Cancer Treatment Experts Are Trained


There are NO college or medical school courses on this planet on curing
advanced cancer patients with natural medicine.

Sometimes I will get an email from a person who wants to be treated by a
medical doctor. Why? The average housewife knows far more about alternative
cancer treatments than almost any medical doctor. Doctors are taught to sell
drugs, not work with natural medicine.

A person who entered medical school in 2002, which is when I started
researching alternative cancer treatments, would not know 1% of what I know
about cancer!! If they specialized in oncology they would know a lot more
about cancer terminology than I do, but would know nothing about how to cure
cancer!!

The reader should clearly understand that any PhD, M.D., naturopath, truck
driver, insurance salesman, housewife or computer repairman, etc., who claims
they are experts in alternative cancer treatments, and they really are experts,
have been self-taught or trained by an expert in alternative medicine.

These people have read books, articles on websites, they may work with cancer
patients, etc. etc. What they know they did not learn in any school.

Mike Vrentas, Ty Bollinger, Bill Henderson and myself, and many others, have
written many things about cancer which any oncologist, naturopath or PhD
could learn from. None of us have medical backgrounds. Ty and I are both
accountants by training. Bill has a background in computers, as do Ty and I.

Mike is a former police officer in downtown Kansas City. But all of us are
bona fide experts in alternative cancer treatments.

For example, Bill Henderson, as he has done to me, can "talk your ear off"
about the importance of dental issues with regards to cancer. Bill knows of
hundreds of cancer cases where the patient could not be cured until they got
their dental infections fixed by one of the extremely rare dentists who can
fix certain kinds of "cavitations." This situation is common with breast
cancer patients, but can apply to other types of cancer as well.

The point is this: do not assume that if a person is not an M.D. or PhD that
they don't know how to cure cancer!!! It could be a fatal mistake to ignore
what someone says just because they are not an M.D. or PhD!!

While I will confess that people who do have medical backgrounds have an
advantage over the rest of us; the end result is that a medical background
really doesn't make that much of a difference. A jet pilot doesn't need to
know how a jet engine works. What is far more important is that the cancer
researcher wants to dig for the truth and has an open mind.

Thank You R. Webster Kehr


God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Why Use Alternative Cancer Treatments


                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer

Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw
                    

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


           Continued From Last Post


God has put hundreds of natural cancer treatments 


on this earth which arefar, far more effective than any orthodox cancer
treatment. Are you surprisedthat God has enough intelligence, integrity,
and a love of humanity, to puthundreds of cures for cancer on this earth?

There are three main reasons alternative cancer treatments are far more
effective than orthodox treatments.

First, natural cancer treatments 


are not toxic, thus they can be given in much higher doses than orthodox
cancer treatments. While a person may  thinkthat chemotherapy is given
in high doses, actually it is given in very low doses.

Second, alternative cancer treatments 

do no harm to the patient, thus the patient has a much longer time for the
treatment to work. Patients would livefar longer if they did absolutely
nothing about their cancer (as opposed tousing orthodox treatments); but
alternative cancer treatments can extend lifeto the point that in many cases
the patient is cured.

    "My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live
up to four times longer than treated individuals. If one has cancer and opts
to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he
undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, other than when used in
immediate life-threatening situations."
    Prof Jones. (1956 Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Medical Sciences,
vol 6.)    

Third, alternative cancer treatments 


can be combined with each other in mostcases. This ability allows the
cancer patient to treat several differentaspects of their cancer at the
same time (such as getting supplements pastthe lactic acid blockade,
building their immune system and getting rid of thecancer cells).

As a result of these advantages, and many more, newly diagnosed cancer
patients (who start their cancer treatment with alternative cancertreatments),
and who have at least 3 months to live, can achieve a cure rateof 93% or
higher if they work with experts in combining multiple alternative
cancer treatments or they do a lot of homework.

But many newly diagnosed cancer patients have cured their cancer by just
drinking a lot of carrot juice and avoiding the foods that feed their cancer
and interfere with their immune system (eating the right foods is called the
"cancer diet").

By comparison, orthodox cancer treatments (using a comparable definition of
"cure rate"), have less than a 3% cure rate. How many people do you
personally know who were diagnosed with cancer more than 7 years ago who
are still alive? The answer is probably none. Any cure rate you see regarding
orthodox cancer treatments, which is higher than 3%, has used very tricky and
deceptive definitions.

    "A German epidemiologist from the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, 

 

Dr Ulrich Abel, has done a comprehensive review and analysis of every major
study and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done. His conclusions should be
read by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express. To make sure he
had reviewed everything ever published on chemotherapy, Abel sent letters to
over 350 medical centers around the world, asking them to send him anything
they had published on the subject. Abel researched thousands of articles: it
is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more about chemotherapy than he.

    "The analysis took him several years, but the results are astounding:


Abel found that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was
'appalling' because there was simply no scientific evidence available
anywhere that chemotherapy can 'extend in any appreciable way the lives of
patients suffering from the most common organic cancers'. Abel emphasizes
that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life. He describes
chemotherapy as 'a scientific wasteland' and states that at least 80 per cent
of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless and is akin to
the 'emperor's new clothes'--neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up
on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works!

(Lancet, 10 August 1991) No mainstream media even mentioned this
comprehensive study: it was totally buried."
    Tim O'Shea, The Doctor Within

Why Work With an Expert?


Can a cancer patient who has been sent home to die by orthodox medicine do
enough homework on the Internet and in books to put together their own
protocol from scratch in time to survive their cancer? Probably not. The key
issue is that among the 400 plus alternative cancer treatments, finding the
15 or 20 treatments which are strong enough to give this patient a chance of
survival is not likely to happen.

But even finding the right protocols is only part of the solution. The immune
system must be rebuilt, the cancer cells must be safely killed (or reverted
into healthy cells), the damage to non-cancerous cells by orthodox treatments
must be reversed, the organs must be protected from detoxification during
treatment, etc.

Few people even know there is a difference between the potency of different
alternative cancer treatments on newly diagnosed cancer patients and fewer
still know there is a much bigger difference in the potency of different
alternative cancer treatments on advanced cancer patients!!

It is also critical to understand that when a cancer patient starts their
treatment with orthodox medicine, by the time they start using alternative
cancer treatments they have lost a great deal of time needed for treatment
plus their body has been severely damaged by orthodox cancer treatments
(as mentioned above) and their body has been damaged by their cancer.

The longer a cancer patient is on orthodox cancer treatments, plus the longer
it takes them to find superb alternative cancer treatments; before they
switch to highly potent alternative cancer treatments; the lower their chance
of survival. Time is a huge factor.

This is why it is critical to find the experts quickly and get started
quickly. Those people who are the experts have all spent more than eight
years researching alternative cancer treatments or they were personally
trained by someone with more than eight years of experience.

             Continued

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Cancer Treatment Case Study


                            SPONSORS


         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer

Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw
                    

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


           Continued From Last Post

A Hypothetical Case Study


So let us take a hypothetical cancer case to analyze. Suppose a cancer
patient has had a large number of chemotherapy sessions, several radiation
sessions and has had extensive surgery.

Suppose this person is sent home to die by orthodox medicine and a relative
of his talks the person into looking at alternative cancer treatments.

Suppose this person goes to a German alternative cancer clinic and has
virtually all of their cancer cells safely killed within a few weeks.

Here is the question:


Has this person been "cured" of cancer? Think about the answer to this
question, keeping in mind what I have already said, before reading on.
To answer this question we have to ask another question: Has this person's
balance between the immune system and the number of cancer cells been
restored?

In a sense the answer is "yes" and in a sense the answer is "no."
Yes, the balance has been restored in the sense that there are no cancer
cells. But this balance is because the person has no cancer cells due to the
German clinic and no immune system (or at least a very damaged immune
system)due to their orthodox treatments. That's not a very good balance
becauseeveryone gets new cancer cells all the time!!

It is impossible to restore a very damaged immune system...


(I include the lining of the stomach and the lining of the colon as part of
the immune system because they are what extract nutrients from foods) within
a few weeks or even a few months and in many cases the immune system cannot
be restored within 2 or 3 years!!

In other words, the balance has been temporarily restored, but when this
person gets new cancer cells, as all people do, there will not be an immune
system which can safely kill the newly forming cancer cells. If nothing else
is done, the cancer will return.

This is one reason that alternative cancer treatment clinics, when they send
someone home, give them alternative cancer treatments to use at home. (Note:
The best of the alternative cancer treatments on this website are generally
far, far better than the treatments the clinics recommend to their
patients!!!)

Thus, while the clinic treatment has provided a superb start to a treatment;
it should only be considered the beginning of the treatment because the
immune system balance with new cancer cells has not been restored for the
long run.

To achieve a true cure for cancer...


the immune system must be very strong and that cannot happen in three weeks.
This does not mean a person needs to live in Germany for several years, it
only means that when they get back from their clinic the work is far from
over, but there has been a good start.

The point is that curing cancer must get started very quickly (because time
is critical) and it also must be a long term process for those who have had a
lot of orthodox cancer treatments. And this discussion has only been the tip
of the iceberg (e.g. I haven't even talked about lactic acid, "buying time"
and many other topics).

Hopefully it is clear that alternative medicine has an entirely different
approach to treating a cancer patient than does orthodox medicine.

What generally happens, however, is that patients who start with orthodox
medicine never look for alternative cancer treatment experts.

Why Use Alternative Cancer Treatments


             Continued

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

About Alternative Cancer Treatments!



                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer

Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw
                     

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


           Continued From Last Post


Alternative cancer treatments



 include four main categories of naturalproducts. First, treatments which use
natural foods (e.g. carrot juice andAloe Arborescens), supplements which
contain many natural substances (e.g.Cellect and LifeOne), treatments which
use natural molecules (e.g. cesiumchloride and calcium) and electromedicine
treatments (e.g. the Rife Machineand Bob Beck Protocol).

There are, in fact, hundreds of alternative cancer treatments. These
treatments usually can be combined with each other to increase their
effectiveness.

There is also the "cancer diet," meaning the things a cancer patient should
and should not eat. Some "cancer diets" are so potent they are highly
effective cancer treatments by themselves. Every cancer patient needs to be
aware that many foods feed cancer cells, other foods encourage cancer cells
to proliferate quickly and other foods virtually destroy the energy of almost
all cells.

An "alternative cancer treatment" will include substances to:
1) Either kill cancer cells or revert them into normal cells,
2) Rebuild the immune system (which was damaged by chemotherapy),
3) Protect and energize the non-cancerous cells,
4) Deal with pain and suffering,
5) Deal with the loss of energy of cancer patients (i.e. cachexia),
6) Deal with their inability to digest foods caused by chemotherapy damaging
    the stomach lining,
7) and so on.

In fact, there are many issues an alternative cancer treatment may have to
deal with. Some issues are rarely considered, such as the effect of dental
infections on some kinds of cancer, especially breast cancer. Another issue
which few people understand is the role of microbes in the spreading of
certain kinds of cancers.

Let us look at the big picture of cancer...Why Do People Get Cancer?


In its most simplistic sense; cancer is caused by an imbalance between the
strength of the immune system and the number of cancer cells in a person's
body.

In other words, every person on earth gets new cancer cells all the time. But
for most people, this is not an issue because their immune system easily and
safely kills these new cancer cells. Mother Nature has designed our bodies to
continually and safely kill newly forming cancer cells.

However, when the immune system becomes weak, or when the number of cancer
cells grows out of control, the number of cancer cells overpowers the immune
system and the person is eventually diagnosed with cancer.

The logical way to solve this problem is to use natural products to build the
immune system, and natural products to safely target and kill the cancer
cells (e.g. laetrile, which is found in apricot kernels).

The immune system is rebuilt and the cancer cells are safely destroyed, thus
the balance is restored and the person is cured of their cancer. Simple,
isn't it?

But that is not the approach of orthodox medicine. The approach of orthodox
medicine severely damages the immune system with chemotherapy, radiation and
surgery; kills many healthy cells because their protocols do not target
cancer cells; and kills some of the cancer cells, but certainly not all of
the cancer cells.

For example, the treatments of orthodox medicine kill fast-growing cells. The
problem is that the immune system has many fast-growing cells. The stomach
lining also has some fast-growing cells and the colon has some fast-growing
cells. All three of these systems are necessary to fight cancer. But these
systems are severely damaged by orthodox cancer treatments.

Plus, not all cancer cells are fast-growing cells, so these cancer cells may
not be killed.

The end result is that the balance between the immune system and the number
of cancer cells has gotten worse because the immune system has been damaged
and there are still many cancer cells left in the body!!

The treatments of orthodox medicine do kill some cancer cells and may or may
not shrink tumors, but they always damage the ability of the person to digest
foods and they damage the immune system. And above all, orthodox medicine
cannot kill all the cancer cells without killing the patient first. Thus, the
patient is left with many, many cancer cells and a weakened and damaged
immune system!!

Orthodox cancer treatments cannot be a "cure" for cancer because the balance
between the immune system and the number of cancer cells has not been
restored. This is why people who are lucky enough to survive their cancer
with orthodox treatments are generally on chemotherapy for life. The
chemotherapy takes the place of the damaged immune system. This is about as
logical as replacing a person's heart with a sump pump.

Because well over 99% of all cancer patients begin their cancer treatment
with orthodox medicine, they are generally in very critical condition even
before they switch to natural medicine and can begin their alternative cancer
treatment.

These patients are very, very difficult to cure, but the experts who work
with these patients, either at a clinic or by telephone, typically have about
a 50% cure rate on these patients!!


             Continued

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Monday, September 9, 2013

Are Alternative Cancer Treatments For Real?


                            SPONSORS

 

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer

Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw
                     

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev



by R. Webster Kehr
Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

Introduction


If I were to ask any person on Earth if God is smarter than pharmaceutical
chemists they would say: "Of course." But if I were to then say that God
knows how to cure cancer better than pharmaceutical chemists, they would look
at me as if I had just escaped from a mental institution.

Why do people think that God is smarter than pharmaceutical chemists and then
turn right around and think that chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are more
effective against cancer than anything God has put into Mother Nature?

Well, to be honest, in 2002 I was totally confused as to which type of cancer
treatment was more effective. I would visit some websites, such as

QuackWatch, the American Cancer Society, the BC Cancer Agency, etc. which
would call alternative cancer treatments "unproven" or "quackery."

On the other hand, I would visit other websites which had testimonials of
people who were cured of their cancer by drinking carrot juice or purple
grape juice or they used some other natural treatment.

It wasn't until I started reading a book written by a medical doctor, Dr.
Philip Binzel, that I finally put the pieces together and realized what was
going on.

Dr. Binzel was using a natural substance 


(an "alternative cancer treatment")called "laetrile" in his clinic. Laetrile
normally is extracted from apricotseeds. He used a liquid version of laetrile
on his patients and he had aboutan 80% cure rate. The liquid version of
laetrile he used came from Mexico.

But what was most interesting to me, in Dr. Binzel's book, is what the Food
and Drug Administration was trying to do about the import of liquid laetrile.
Dr. Binzel was called as an expert witness at a trial in which the FDA was
trying to get permission by the court to block the importing of laetrile into
the United States!!

Why would the Food and Drug administration try to block the import of a
cancer treatment which was totally natural and had an 80% cure rate when
used as an I.V.!!?? That is a far higher cure rate than the 3% cure rate of
orthodox medicine.

It was at this moment, while reading the book, that I realized what was going
on. The FDA was trying to block the import of laetrile NOT because laetrile
was ineffective, but precisely BECAUSE laetrile was effective!!

It was obvious to me that the FDA represented what was best for "Big
Business," not what was best for the general public!! In other words, the FDA
was at that trial to persecute alternative medicine because alternative
medicine was starting to cut into the profits of the pharmaceutical industry,
the medical cartel, and so forth.

I had seen this behavior of a government agency before with regards to the
Department of Energy.

I have learned that some government agencies exist primarily to protect the
profits of favored and wealthy corporate interests. On the surface these
government agencies pretend to be there to protect the general public, but in
fact they are there to protect the profits of very wealthy industries.

Since 2002 I have found that alternative cancer treatments cost far less than
the main orthodox cancer treatments of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation;
yet alternative cancer treatments can be far, far more effective than any
orthodox cancer treatment!!

How can this be so?


Since you probably already know about orthodox cancer treatments, let me tell
you a short story to highlight the difference between orthodox cancer
treatments and alternative cancer treatments:

A Story


Suppose you own an antique dining room table which is worth many tens of
thousands of dollars. Suppose your butler tells you that there are dozens of
cockroaches crawling around on your priceless table and you will be having
dinner guests in one hour.

Your butler informs you that his job description does not include killing
cockroaches and as he is leaving your house he suggests four options for
getting rid of the cockroaches:
1) He suggests you use a chainsaw to "slash" the little critters to pieces,
2) He suggests you use a large and powerful flamethrower to "burn" the
critters to pieces,
3) He suggests you pour 2 gallons of a highly, highly toxic liquid chemical
on the table to "poison" the critters, and
4) He suggests you use an old $1 flyswatter.

Which of the four options would you use to get rid of the cockroaches? 


Wouldyou choose one of the first three options (slash, burn and poison) because
they are highly potent at killing cockroaches or would you choose the cheap,
wimpy flyswatter?

Think about why you would make your choice.

Most likely you would pick the flyswatter because the other three items
(which are far more powerful than a flyswatter at killing cockroaches) are
also massively powerful at destroying your priceless table!!

Chemotherapy (the toxic chemical above), surgery (the chainsaw above) and
radiation (the flamethrower above) do kill cancer cells, but they also kill
healthy cells (the priceless antique table), damage the immune system, damage
the ability of your digestive tract to process nutrients, etc. because they
do not target cancer cells. Thus, these treatments cannot cure cancer (which
has spread) without killing the patient first.

By comparison, alternative cancer treatments (the flyswatter), while not as
powerful as the other items, are far more effective at treating cancer
because these treatments either target cancer cells or do not damage your
healthy cells, Thus they can be given in much higher doses than any of the
"orthodox" cancer treatments. For example, a person can drink a quart of
carrot juice but they cannot drink a quart of chemotherapy!!

In addition to the ability to use high doses, the many alternative cancer
treatments can generally be combined.

End of Story

About Alternative Cancer Treatments



             Continued

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Sunday, September 8, 2013

The "Root Cause" of Cancer


                            SPONSORS


         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer Treatments...WHOLESALE...Everyone knows someone that Has or

Died From cancer.

                    http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw
                     

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


Fixing the "Root Cause" of Cancer

While many natural cancer treatments


do very well against cancer, what is missing in many natural cancer treatment protocols is getting rid of the microbes in the organs, which is the "root cause" of most cases of cancer.

In many cases the immune system can get rid of these microbes, but in fact some types of tapeworms, flukes and fungus, etc. cannot be killed by the immune system for one reason or another (e.g. the microbes are not accessible by the immune system).

Liver flushes and special nutrients may be required to deal with these microbes and parasites. But the fact is that many natural cancer treatments do very well without dealing with these special microbes. But the patient should be aware of these issues.

By getting rid of the microbes in the organs, plus doing the normal cancer treatments, the balance (i.e. a strong immune system and a low number of cancer cells) is restored enough to keep the cancer from coming back. The patient is cured because their immune system has been fixed and the number of cancer cells (by using special protocols) has been reduced!! The cancer will not come back as long as the patient watches their diet.

The approach of orthodox medicine, 


however, is to severely damage the immune system with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. This makes the imbalance even worse because these things damage the immune system and do a very poor job of targeting the cancer cells and do an even worse job of killing the microbes in the organs.

Orthodox cancer treatments also kill many healthy cells and can damage organs, the lymph system, etc. Is it any wonder the cancer always seems to "come back" after surgery or chemotherapy? This is called "regression."

For example, how does cutting off a breast going to fix the immune system? Don't be absurd. I don't know how many times I have told cancer patients that "you cannot cut cancer out."

Is it any wonder that alternative cancer treatments, when administered by experts, have a massively higher cure rate than orthodox medicine? Most natural cancer treatments include immune builders and things that kill cancer cells. Some protocols also include things to clean the blood of microbes, which will also supercharge the immune system.

Ponder this carefully: even when orthodox medicine puts someone into "remission" (i.e. their cancer appears to be gone), they have not fixed the "root cause" of the cancer, so it is almost certain the cancer will come back!! That is why the true "five-year" cure rate of orthodox medicine is less than 3%.

Because the "root cause" of cancer 


is a weak immune system, YOU CANNOT CUT CANCER OUT, you have to deal with the "root cause" of the cancer!!!

Even in Natural Medicine the Cancer Can Come Back


Many natural cancer treatments, whether cancer treatments that kill the cancer cells or even revert the cancer cells into normal cells, can have significant regression rates!!

One reason was discussed above, the microbes in the organs and/or bloodstream were not identified and destroyed.

In other words, even natural cancer treatments that kill cancer cells or revert cancer cells into normal cells can have the cancer return!! If natural cancer treatments don't fix the "root cause" of the cancer, by cleaning the blood, and especially the organs of microbes and parasites, the cancer can come back.

Using This Information in the Treatment of Cancer


Let's ask one more question: have there been any cancer treatments that cured cancer by killing the microbes inside the cancer cells?

In the 1930s Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, was able to cure cancer with gentle electromedicine, which had two frequencies. One frequency was designed to kill the cancer bacteria and the second frequency was a "carrier" frequency which got the other frequency through the cell membrane (and actually through the entire body) to get inside the cancer cells to kill the microbes.

Dr. Rife had a 100% cure rate of cancer patients, but he was shut down by the FDA after refusing to sell his technology to the American Medical Association (a corrupt labor union), which he knew would bury his technology.

Two modern day "Rife Machines" have replicated both of the types of "Rife Machines" that Rife built. These are the GB-4000 family of very, very gentle electromedicine devices, which were mentioned above. On this website the GB-4000 devices are usually called the "High RF Frequency Protocols" for legal reasons.

These are currently the only electromedicine devices which have the Rife carrier waves and are the only "Rife Machines" endorsed by this website. The ICRF is currently working on a new concept electromedicine device which has a carrier wave, but due to lack of funding, and lack of manpower, our progress is very, very slow.

The Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. (ICRF) researches both electromedicine protocols (such as Rife developed) and has also designed several cancer treatments using: DMSO, MSM, honey, maple syrup or molassas as carriers (i.e. Trojan Horses) to get microbe killing substances inside of cancer cells. These treatments have been very successful.

Thank You R. Webster Kehr

 

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com