Analysis Identifies Shocking Problems with Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered Corn

                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                   http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

                  
  "19 Drug-Free Arthritis Treatment ‘Secrets’ the Big
  Drug Companies Hope and Pray You’ll Never Discover..."
                  http://bit.ly/193hi3i


Analysis Identifies Shocking Problems with Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered Corn


By Dr. Mercola

    I’ve warned you of the potential dangers of genetically engineered (GE) foods for many years now, pointing out that such crops might have wholly unforeseen consequences. In recent years, such suspicions have increasingly proven correct.

    One of the latest pieces of evidence supporting the suspicion that GE crops are in no way, shape or form comparable to their natural counterparts is a nutritional analysis that shows just how different they really are.

    Inherent differences are essentially implied by the fact that GE crop seeds can be patented in the first place. And in many ways, I believe Monsanto is slowly but surely inching its way toward patenting nature itself, in the same way others are fighting to maintain patent rights for human DNA.

    These companies are trying to patent “life,” and they likely will unless they’re stopped by the courts. But it’s quite clear that humans cannot outsmart nature.

    The latest nutritional analysis of GE corn couldn’t be more relevant as the recently passed Agricultural Appropriations Bill (HR9332) included a hotly detested provision (Section 735) that places Monsanto above the law. As noted by the featured article:

        “With the recent passing of the Monsanto Protection Act, there is no question that mega corporations like Monsanto are able to wield enough power to even surpass that of the United States government.

        The new legislation provides Monsanto with a legal safeguard against federal courts striking down any pending review of dangerous genetically modified crops. It is ironic to see the passing of such a bill in the face of continuous releases of GMO dangers.”

    At present, the only way to avoid GMOs is to ditch processed foods from your grocery list, and revert back to whole foods grown according to organic standards.

Analysis Finds Monsanto’s GE Corn Nutritionally Inferior and High in Toxins

    A report given to Moms Across America by an employee of De Dell Seed Company (Canada's only non-GMO corn seed company) offers a stunning picture of the nutritional differences between genetically engineered (GE) and non-GE corn. Clearly, the former is NOT equivalent to the latter, which is the very premise by which genetically engineered crops were approved in the first place.

    Here’s a small sampling of the nutritional differences found in this 2012 nutritional analysis:

        Calcium: GMO corn = 14 ppm / Non-GMO corn = 6,130 ppm (437 times more)
        Magnesium: GMO corn = 2 ppm / Non-GMO corn = 113 ppm (56 times more)
        Manganese: GMO corn = 2 ppm / Non-GMO corn = 14 ppm (7 times more)

    GMO corn was also found to contain 13 ppm of glyphosate, compared to zero in non-GMO corn. This is quite significant and well worth remembering.

    The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) “safe” level for glyphosate in American water supplies is 0.7 ppm. In Europe, the maximum allowable level in water is 0.2 ppm. Organ damage in animals has occurred at levels as low as 0.1 ppm... At 13 ppm, GMO corn contains more than 18 times the “safe” level of glyphosate set by the EPA.

    This is truly disturbing when you consider the fact that in countries like Argentina, glyphosate is blamed for the dramatic increase in devastating birth defects as well as cancer. Sterility and miscarriages are also increasing. This may be due to its similarity to DDT, which is well-known to cause reproductive problems, among other things.

    Another health hazard associated with glyphosate is its effect on gut bacteria. Not only does it promote the growth of more virulent pathogens, it also kills off beneficial bacteria that might keep such pathogens in check—both in the soil, and in the gut of animals or humans that ingest the contaminated crop.

    It's important to understand that the glyphosate actually becomes systemic throughout the plant, so it cannot be washed off. It's inside the plant. And once you eat it, it ends up in your gut where it can wreak total havoc with your health, considering the fact that 80 percent of your immune system resides there and is dependent on a healthy ratio of good and bad bacteria.

    An additional disturbing piece of information is that GMO corn contained extremely high levels of formaldehyde. According to Dr. Huber, at least one study found that 0.97 ppm of ingested formaldehyde was toxic to animals. GMO corn contains a staggering 200 times that amount! Perhaps it’s no wonder that animals, when given a choice, avoid genetically engineered feed.


Thank You  Dr. Mercola

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

The Truth About Cancer Treatments

                                               SPONSORS

                           The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

                  
                  "19 Drug-Free Arthritis Treatment ‘Secrets’ the Big
             Drug Companies Hope and Pray You’ll Never Discover..."
                                       http://bit.ly/193hi3i

The Truth About Cancer Treatments

Did you know that "cure rates" for the same kind of cancer can range from 3% to 90%? Safe and gentle cancer treatments (with 90% cure rates) have existed for decades!! But the general public does not know about these cancer treatments because the media doesn't talk about them.

The general public also doesn't know that there are more than 20 cancer treatments which can revert cancer cells into normal cells!! Reverting cancer cells into normal cells was first done in the 1930s.

Why doesn't the media talk about the safe and gentle cancer treatments with 90% cure rates and the safe and gentle cancer treatments that revert cancer cells into normal cells??

The reason is that the media is owned by multi-billionaires and the treatments that have 90% cure rates are not profitable enough to satisfy their lust for profits. People who trust the media and the multi-billionaires who own the pharmaceutical industry have a 3% chance of surviving their cancer for 5 years!!

If you don't believe me, study the data in the Australian and American orthodox medicine "5-year survival" charts and see what the 5-year cure rate is for your type of cancer:
Clinical Oncology (2004) 16: 549-560):
Oncology Cure Rates

If you studied the charts, the 5-year cure rate in America is 2.1%. In other words, in five years after diagnosis, 97.9% of the cancer patients treated with orthodox cancer treatments are dead.

So what are the cancer treatments with 90% cure rates that the media is hiding? I will give you one quick example.

The late Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist turned cancer researcher, treated over 33,000 cancer patients. Among those who went to him first, his 5-year cure rate was 90%.

Why hasn't the media glorified Dr. Kelley? The reason is that Dr. Kelley used products that cannot be patented. It is patents that create massive profits for the media and the pharmaceutical industry and the medical industry!! Because Dr. Kelley did not use patented drugs, the media doesn't talk about him and no one in the medical industry is using his safe, gentle and highly effective protocol.

Dr. Kelley cured cancer patients by using natural enzymes, called proteolytic enzymes, which strip the protein coating off of cancer cells so the immune system can identify the cancer cells and kill them. This protocol exists today and can be added to any of the newer natural cancer treatments and it is a very good addition.

Many natural medicine cancer researchers have not only used his protocols, but have greatly improved on Dr. Kelley's protocol!!

For example, the Cellect-Budwig protocol (see the left side-bar, which is the column of links on the left side of all web pages), which was designed by Mike Vrentas, a natural medicine cancer researcher, includes a product called Cellect, some key parts of the Kelley protocol which have been integrated and includes other natural cancer treatments, many times based on individual needs. If one can afford it the protocol can include one of the modern Rife devices, which will be discussed in a moment.

The Cellect-Budwig protocol is just one of several highly potent cancer treatments.

Ponder this next question before reading on: Why did Mike Vrentas add other products, including Cellect, to the Kelley Protocol, which already had a 90% cure rate? Hint: it was not to increase the cure rate!!

While Mike deals with newly diagnosed cancer patients, most of the patients he works with have already had chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. His protocol deals with cancer patients who are in a wide range of different conditions, requiring an even more powerful regimen.

If Mike, and others like him, only worked with newly diagnosed cancer patients, he likely would not have added anything to the Kelley protocol. But because of the media it is fairly rare when Mike or I or any of us get to work with a newly diagnosed cancer patient!!

Because of the media almost all cancer patients start their cancer treatment with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery and by the time they are "sent home to die" they figuratively have "one foot in the grave." But it is usually several months after they are sent home to die that they accidentally learn about natural medicine, if they ever hear about it!! It is only then that they look into natural medicine.

It is when they learn about natural medicine that we are contacted by the patient for the first time. But most cancer patients die without ever knowing about the power that God put into Mother Nature to help His children.

You can thank the media for the fact that the vast majority of cancer patients die without ever knowing that there are many cures for cancer in natural medicine!!

For those sent home to die, the Kelley protocol, by itself, is simply not strong enough to deal with advanced cancer patients. That is why, in natural medicine, Mike and others generally use the Kelley protocol as a supplemental protocol to newer and far more powerful treatments which were designed for advanced cancer patients.

The reason orthodox medicine (which always treats newly diagnosed cancer patients) doesn't use the Kelley protocol is that his highly effective treatments are not as profitable, by a wide margin, as drug-based orthodox treatments. This is because natural substances, like natural enzymes, cannot be patented.

The entire battle between orthodox medicine and natural medicine is driven by patent laws combined with insatiable greed.

So while natural medicine cancer researchers frequently embrace the Kelley protocol, and add it to newer products and technologies, orthodox medicine has ignored and persecuted the Kelley protocol.

Why have the media's "investigative journalists" not uncovered all of this and glorified Dr. Kelley and his amazing cancer treatments? Because they want to keep their jobs. The products that Dr. Kelley used are not as profitable to the media, by a wide margin, as current treatments. "Investigative journalists" work for the media companies, they only pretend to work for the general public.

The media only glorifies things that are profitable to their owners. The media is like an iceberg: you only see the 10% of the truth they want you to see. The other 90% of the truth is blacklisted because it does not lead to higher profits. But they are masters at making you think you are seeing the entire iceberg!! More is said about media tactics in Part 2 of this article.

In fact, the propaganda machine of the media has totally ignored Dr. Kelley, as has the medical establishment. As a result, the general public cannot believe someone could have a cure rate that high!!

But modern natural medicine cancer researchers, who are not controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, have access to far better materials than what Dr. Kelley had access to. Cellect is just one example.

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

 

Some Facts About Fluoride You Need to Know...

                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                   http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

                  
  "19 Drug-Free Arthritis Treatment ‘Secrets’ the Big
  Drug Companies Hope and Pray You’ll Never Discover..."
                  http://bit.ly/193hi3i

 Hi Folks,

I just wanted to let everyone know that I Center a lot of my time on finding
cancer information that I can pass on to you. I hope that I may be able to help
some people beat cancer like I have and live a life of good health.

I also have, in the archives, plenty of different articles on other diseases that can
be cured...NOT just the symptoms treated. Please look through them along with
the new articles that I will be posting. It's really easy and inexpensive to stay healthy.

Some Facts About Fluoride You Need to Know

By Dr. Mercola

    If fluoride is really the panacea for dental disease that it’s been portrayed as,
then why is it that the United States is one of the only developed countries that
fluoridates their citizens drinking water?

    Hint: It’s not because the other countries aren’t aware of fluoride’s supposed miracle powers for your teeth it’s because they fully realize that adding a known poison to your population’s water supply is probably not a good idea.

    Even in North America, water fluoridation has come under increasing scrutiny; since 2010, more than 75 US and Canadian communities have voted to end water fluoridation, and the issue is heating up as more and more people begin to demand water that does not expose them to this highly toxic industrial waste product.

Most Developed Countries Do Not Fluoridate Their Water

    More people drink fluoridated water in the US alone than in the rest of the world combined. In Western Europe, for instance, 97 percent of the population drinks non-fluoridated water.

Fluoridated Countries Do Not Have Less Tooth Decay Than Non-Fluoridated Countries

    According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there is no discernible difference in tooth decay between developed countries that fluoridate their water and those that do not. The decline in tooth decay the US has experienced over the last 60 years, which is often attributed to fluoridated water, has likewise occurred in all developed countries (most of which do not fluoridate their water).

Thank You  Dr. Mercola

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Could 89 Percent of ‘Landmark’ Cancer Research Be Untruthful?

                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                   http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

                  
  "19 Drug-Free Arthritis Treatment ‘Secrets’ the Big
  Drug Companies Hope and Pray You’ll Never Discover..."
                  http://bit.ly/193hi3i

Could 89 Percent of ‘Landmark’ Cancer Research Be Untruthful?

The headline above is not only a question...It is also a statement
that is throughout the internet in various different places and the
conclusion of many researchers.

After reading different research and before my diagnosis appointment
with my doctor, I made my decision to go the alternative approach
for my cancer treatment.

My doctor ignored me when I told him of my decision. He just
kept talking about my upcoming surgery and kemo treatment. The
third time I stated "NO"...He looked at me and said he would no
longer be my doctor because I was unwilling to follow his
recomendations.

He tried to convince me that the alternative approach would not
work. Our conversation ended when I told him I was unwilling to
put myself through the pain and sickness that he, (our medical
profession) recomended.

According to him I had a very short time to live. That was May
of 2007. At this time I have not ever experienced any pain or
sickness from my cancer.

Could 89 Percent of ‘Landmark’ Cancer Research Be Untruthful?

    Findings such as the ones above, which demonstrate the significant
benefits of lifestyle changes like exercise on your physical and mental
health, become all the more important in light of mounting evidence showing
that conventional drug treatment research has been sorely compromised by
industry funding. As discussed in a recent GreenMedInfo article,10 the alleged
groundbreaking results of nearly nine out of 10 cancer studies cannot be
reproduced by any means!

        This means that to an extent, we have based our healthcare and
clinical guidelines on fake studies that reported untruthful results in order
to accommodate the interests of industrial corporations, Eleni Roumeliotou
writes.

        Cancer is a major killer in US. The American Cancer Society reports
that in 2012, more than half a million Americans died from cancer, while more
than 1.6 million new cases were diagnosed. Given the seriousness of these
statistics and the necessity of evidence-based medicine, it would make sense
to trust that honest, objective research is tirelessly trying to find the best
cancer therapies out there.

    Alas, this trust in the scientific rigor of medical research appears to
have been misplaced. First of all, nearly three-quarters of all retracted drug
studies are due to falsification of data, meaning it’s not even a matter of
misinterpretation of data; rather the data used to draw conclusions are pure
fiction. Large numbers of patients can be affected when false findings are
published, as the average lag time between publication of the study and the
issuing of a retraction is 39 months. And that's if it's ever caught at all.

    Last year, former drug company researcher Glenn Begley also showed that
the vast majority of the "landmark" studies on cancer are unreliable and a
high proportion of those unreliable studies come from respectable university
labs. Begley looked at 53 papers in the world's top journals, and found that
he and a team of scientists could NOT replicate 47 of the 53 published studies
all of which were considered important and valuable for the future of cancer
treatments!

    Part of the problem, they said, is that scientists often ignore negative
findings in their results that might raise a warning. Instead, they opt for
cherry-picking conclusions in an effort to put their research in a favorable
light. The allegations appeared in the March 28 issue of the prestigious
journal Nature.

        "It was shocking," Begley said. "These are the studies the
pharmaceutical industry relies on to identify new targets for drug
development. But if you're going to place a $1 million or $2 million or $5
million bet on an observation, you need to be sure it's true. As we tried to
reproduce these papers we became convinced you can't take anything at face
value."

    As if that’s not disturbing enough, Roumeliotou points out that Begley was
not permitted to disclose which 53 cancer studies he evaluated and found to be
without scientific merit. She writes:

        ...when they contacted the original authors and asked for details of
the experiments, they had to sign an agreement that they would not disclose
their findings or sources. This shows that the scientists, who published the
tainted research, were all along, fully aware of the discrepancies of their
articles and criminally conscious of the fact that they were misleading the
medical and public opinion.

Thank You  Dr. Mercola

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.