UNLIMITED NINJA Fun FREE
Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE
World's #1 Publisher of Information About
Alternative Cancer Treatments
The Solution For Disease FREE Health.
Let us draw a timeline in our minds. At the beginning of this timeline is the date a person is diagnosed with cancer. At the end of this timeline is when this person reaches an age of 100 years.
Let us put a single mark on this timeline. That mark is where this patient would have died if they had refused all types of medical treatment for their cancer. Let us say they did absolutely nothing to change their diet or treat their cancer with either orthodox or alternative cancer treatments. We will call this mark the baseline. It is the line where a person who refuses any and all treatments would die.
The scientific data is clear the vast majority of orthodox cancer patients will die to the left of their baseline or on top of their baseline!!
Chemotherapy is 70 year old technology. It never worked, it will never work because, as Dr. Binzel stated, it treats the wrong thing. Modern cancer research is still not aimed at treating the right thing. Radiation therapy is even older than chemotherapy and surgery is even older than radiation.
What about alternative treatments? Alternative treatments do no harm to the patient. Thus, because alternative treatments build the immune system and selectively kill cancer cells, it is clear that it is impossible for alternative treatments to land a patient to the left of their baseline!! Alternative treatments treat the right thing the immune system. Virtually all alternative cancer treatments will cause a person to live to the right of the baseline.
This is especially true of the patient eats the right foods during their treatment and avoids the wrong foods (this is called the cancer diet). The cancer diet alone has cured many cancer patients.
The question is this: how do we use alternative treatments to get a person to live well past the baseline? Or to put it another way, how do we get alternative treatments to cure cancer, in the sense that the main body of cancer cells is dead and the immune system is built up to the point it can deal with new cancer cells?
There are more than 400 alternative treatments for cancer that will allow more than half of those who use those treatments to cure their cancer. These treatments can usually be combined to increase the effectiveness of just one protocol.
The best of the alternative cancer treatments (which are actually combinations of several alternative treatments) will easily cure over 90% of those who use those treatments instead of orthodox treatments. The Kelley treatment is somewhat obsolete by today’s standards and today’s definitions are even more strict than what Kelley used.
I am totally convinced, based on my extensive research, that if the pharmaceutical industry (i.e. Big Pharma), our government agencies, the American Cancer Society, the American Medical Association, etc., put their money and efforts into natural medicine research, that it would not be long before 99% of all cancer patients would not die of anything related to cancer or cancer treatments, directly or indirectly! People would be more afraid of the flu than cancer! That is the way it should be, but that is not the way it is.
Only the person’s immune system or the safe and selective killing of cancer cells will cause a person to live longer than the baseline. Orthodox treatments destroy a person’s immune system and do not selectively kill cancer cells, nor do they safely kill cancer cells. Chemotherapy is both toxic and carcinogenic.
Yet, all the time doctors tell their patients something like this: if you don’t have chemotherapy you will live six months. What exactly does that mean? It implies that the patient will live longer if they have chemotherapy, than if they avoid chemotherapy. But there is absolutely no scientific evidence that chemotherapy, except for a few rare types of cancer, ever extends the total life of a patient. It is nothing but a scare tactic.
What Orthodox Medicine is Hiding
Suppose you had a chart where for each type of cancer, diagnosed at each stage, there is listing of every possible type of cancer treatment plan, alternative and orthodox, along with the total life that each plan provides the typical patient with this type of cancer, which is diagnosed at each stage. Suppose also that these statistics were compiled by honest people.
For example, suppose there was a page for stage 3 / pancreas cancer. On this page was a listing of the 100 best alternative treatments for stage 3 pancreas cancer, along with the expected total life of new cancer patients who chose each of these treatment plans. Likewise, suppose on this same page was a listing of the total life for each of the dozens of types of orthodox cancer treatments. Plus, suppose there was the total life of those who refused all treatments.
By looking at this chart, a person with newly diagnosed stage 3 pancreas cancer could easily determine which of the more than one hundred types of cancer treatments had the highest total life for stage 3 pancreas cancer. Likewise, suppose a similar chart existed for each type of cancer, diagnosed at each stage.
To apply this concept, suppose you were diagnosed with Stage 3 pancreas cancer. Suppose you looked at the chart for Pancreas cancer / Stage 3 and saw that a patient who took a specific orthodox treatment had a total life expectancy of 10 months and that patients who were treated with the Cameron/Pauling vitamin C protocol, and did not have any orthodox treatments, had a total life of 100 months. (Note: the actual total life numbers are not known but the total life ratio in this hypothetical example is based on the actual Cameron/Pauling ratio.)
You would note that the orthodox patients went through months of very painful chemotherapy and radiation, not to mention they suffered much sickness, the destruction of their digestive tract linings, sterility, DNA damage, destruction of their immune system, etc. The vitamin C patients had none of these side effects, instead they had their immune system built up and lived 90 months longer. Which treatment would you pick based on the chart?
Wouldn’t you love to see the chart for your situation if you were recently diagnosed with cancer!! I would love to see such charts!! This web site would not be necessary and I could get my life back!!
Having a chart as I just described, for the best 100 alternative treatments for cancer and for all orthodox treatments, it would be easy to decide which treatment protocol to choose. However, it is the sole purpose of the FDA, NCI (National Cancer Institute), and NIH (National Institutes of Health), all government agencies, the ACS, etc. to make sure such charts are never created.
Why are government agencies and orthodox medicine so opposed to these charts existing? The reason is that if such charts existed no one would ever choose orthodox treatments for cancer. No one EVER!
If such charts existed, the percentage of recently diagnosed cancer patients who died of something unrelated to cancer and unrelated to cancer treatments would quickly climb to over 99% because everyone would take a combination of the best alternative treatments for their type of cancer! That is not an exaggeration!
But the government doesn’t want you to pick the right treatment, they want you to pick one of the Big Pharma treatments. They don’t want you to know the truth.
It is not that these people want you to die they don’t care about that they want money. The typical high-level government employee in the FDA, NIH or NCI will be a millionaire within 3 years of quitting the government. Big Pharma will reward them for their services while they were with the government. This word spreads back to the current executives and the cycle of loyalty continues.
Essentially, the government agencies are nothing but departments of Big Pharma. I will say more about that in a moment.
There is no lobby in Washington as large, as powerful or as well financed as the pharmaceutical lobby, and according to a report from Public Citizen, more than half of the drug industry’s 625 registered lobbyists [that is more than the number of members of Congress!] are either former members of Congress or former Congressional staff members and government employees Other evidence suggesting possible FDA bias turned up in a study revealing that 37 of the 49 top FDA officials who left the agency moved into high corporate positions with the company they had regulated. Over 100 FDA officials owned stock in the drug companies they were assigned to manage.
But let’s think about those charts I talked about earlier. Suppose that orthodox treatments were at the top of every one of the charts, and alternative cancer treatment fared very poorly against orthodox treatments. Why would Big Pharma feel the need to bribe public officials and Congressmen?
If alternative medicine didn’t work, the FDA would shut down all the quacks, and Big Pharma wouldn’t care. But it isn’t the quacks that Big Pharma is concerned about. It is the people that can cure cancer that Big Pharma bribes the FDA to shut down.
Yes, there are alternative medicine quacks out there, but by shutting down the real quacks, there is a public impression that everyone the FDA shuts down is a quack. Nothing could be further from the truth. Many of the clinics the feds shut down (whether FDA, FTC or whatever) are top-notch alternative clinics that have very high cure rates. There have been scores of excellent alternative practitioners (some of them M.D.s) who had far better cure rates than orthodox medicine, but who were shut down by orthodox medicine, usually by the AMA or FDA.
By far the world’s greatest repository of alternative medicine cures for cancer is at the FDA offices. These are cures they have shut down. I have, on more than one occasion, personally come across a superb alternative cancer cure only to learn that the FDA shut it down 20 years ago and the details of the treatment have been buried!!
The point is that if orthodox medicine were superior, in terms of total life, why wouldn’t they want those charts to be made?! Ponder that carefully. If orthodox medicine were superior, they would gladly put together the statistical information using total life to prove their supposed superiority. They wouldn’t need layer after layer of deception the truth would tell the story. They could save a lot of money in bribes and lobbyists if those charts existed and their products were superior.
The NIH would gladly fund hundreds of legitimate studies for alternative medicine if these studies gave them the results they wanted. But they know the truth and know they must suppress the truth and suppress the charts. It is the attempts by alternative medicine to put together enough evidence to gather these statistics that is the primary target of government corruption (yes, the ease and willingness to be bribed is one of the major criteria for the definition of corruption).
Now consider this. If orthodox cancer therapy were superior to alternative cancer therapies, then alternative cancer practitioners would want their patients to have surgery, as part of the treatment, to kill concentrated masses of cancer cells, and hope this caused the patients to live longer. In other words, alternative doctors would use surgery to hide the ineffectiveness of their treatments. On the other hand, orthodox treatments would not require surgery because orthodox treatments would safely kill cancer cells.
But just the opposite is true. Orthodox therapies request surgery to kill concentrated masses of cancer cells and hide their ineffectiveness. On the other hand, I have never heard of one of the respected alternative cancer practitioners recommend surgery to kill cancer cells. It isn’t necessary. The only time surgery is recommended is to remove the pain of a tumor pressing against another organ or if there is a blockage or there is some immediate life-threatening problem caused by the tumor. But never is surgery recommended as part of the cancer treatment.
Ditto for radiation.
Yet, in spite of the fact that orthodox medicine uses surgery, in almost every case, a person would live longer if they refused all orthodox treatments, including surgery.
The imaginary charts I am talking about is what the orthodox establishment, which includes the American Medical Association (AMA), FDA, NIH, NCI, American Cancer Society (ACS), quack watch, etc. don’t want you to ever see. All of these organizations are funded and controlled by Big Pharma or they are in collusion with Big Pharma. There have been over 50 books written on this corruption and suppression of truth! Have you ever heard one of these books discussed on television?
The orthodox establishment wants you to think that there is no scientific evidence that alternative treatments work. In fact, our corrupt government has carefully manufactured the public impression that there is no scientific evidence. This allows them to justify not creating the charts I have been talking about and it allows them the authority to crush alternative medicine. Future chapters of this eBook will go into the politics of cancer in far more detail.
Especially For Those Who Don’t Have Cancer
People who don’t have cancer rarely give cancer a second thought. All their life they have been conditioned to believe that the medical community is diligently making progress in the War Against Cancer. They believe there is nothing to worry about. If they get cancer, the medical community will take good care of them and furthermore a cure is always right around the corner. All of this is an assumption that could cost a person their life!
When a person is diagnosed with cancer, they are in a total state of hysteria and panic. They will grab at the first rope that is thrown to them. Guess what, orthodox practitioners are more than happy to throw them that rope.
When a person is told they have cancer, the medical establishment forcefully tells them that they immediately need to have surgery, and usually tells them they will need to have chemotherapy and radiation. This was drilled into your medical doctor while he or she was in medical school but it is a giant lie.
If you are not prepared, in advance, for the utter terror of being told you have cancer, and to the enormous pressure of orthodox medicine, you will end up being cut open and probably have toxic sludge put into your arteries. You will get sick, your immune system will be destroyed, you will wish you were dead, and it is all for nothing, because orthodox treatments for cancer are worthless and almost always do far more damage than good. And all of this will happen before you knew what hit you.
Furthermore, and understand this carefully, doctors will not tell you your options, especially your alternative cancer treatment options. If they mention alternative treatments, they are talking about using nutrition and natural substances to treat the symptoms of chemotherapy and radiation, (i.e. complementary medicine), they are not talking about the alternative cancer treatments this web site discusses.
Many cancer patients think, when they hear about complementary medicine, that orthodox medicine and alternative medicine have joined forces in a cozy relationship. The relationship is more like a lion and a lamb. Big Pharma allows limited use of natural substances to treat the symptoms of chemotherapy so patients will not drop out of chemotherapy due to sickness. No doubt their motivation is so that the patient will stay on chemotherapy longer, and thus Big Pharma will make more profits.
But what if you are diagnosed with cancer and you haven’t done your homework? You might consider telling your doctor you will think about the proposed treatments for a couple of weeks. You might buy time by asking your doctor to produce scientific articles that prove the proposed treatment extends the total life of similar cancer patients compared to patients who refused all treatments. (Warning: Do not get duped by letting your doctor talk about 5-year cure rates.)
During those two weeks, do not go to work. Spend those weeks studying this web site, then go to other web sites I link to. Do absolutely nothing but read during those two weeks.
The main thing you need to look for are testimonials. It is the testimonials, not the scientific evidence, that will convince you that alternative treatments really work. It is exactly for this reason that the medical establishment does not consider testimonials as scientific evidence. But they are scientific evidence powerful evidence, but they don’t lead to the conclusions the medical establishment wants you come to.
Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.
God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513