have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.
SPONSORS
The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
By Barbara Loe Fisher
These are desperate times for those denying vaccine risks.
We know it because we are witnessing so many acts of desperation
being committed by doctors determined to shut down the public
conversation about vaccination and health.
Vaccine risk deniers are working overtime to restrict public
access to information, cover up vaccine injuries and deaths and
violate the human right to informed consent to medical risk-taking.
No Flu Shots? No Employment
2013 was only a few days old when public health agencies and
medical trade groups called for veteran nurses and other health
care workers to be fired for refusing to obey orders to get
annual flu shots no exceptions and no questions asked.
It did not matter that the risky and notoriously ineffective
influenza vaccine turned out to be almost useless in preventing
infection with the most prevalent influenza strains circulating
in the US this year.
Proposed State Legislation to Force Vaccine Use
This was followed by the introduction of legislation backed
by public health officials and Pharma-funded medical trade groups
like the American Academy of Pediatrics in states like Texas,
Oregon, Arizona and Vermont.
Their goal is to remove or restrict non-medical vaccine
exemptions in state laws so doctors have more power to force
vaccine use by children and adults - no questions asked and no
exceptions.
Institute of Medicine Report: Where Is the Good Vaccine Science?
In mid-January came the eye-opening Institute of Medicine
committee report acknowledging that only 37 scientific studies
have examined the safety of the current US vaccine schedule for
newborns and children under age six, which now totals a stunning
49 doses of 14 vaccines5 compared to 23 doses of 7 vaccines
recommended in 1983.
The lack of enough good scientific studies meant the committee
could not determine whether the number of doses and timing of
government recommended vaccinations is - or is not - associated
with development of chronic health problems like seizures,
autoimmunity, allergies, learning disabilities and autism in the
first six years of life.
New U.S. Autism Prevalence Statistic: 1 Child in 50
In March, a report was issued by the National Center for
Health Statistics estimating that among children attending school
in America today, 1 child in 50 has been diagnosed with autism
spectrum disorder (ASD). In 2004, that number was 1 child in 150.
In 1992, it was 1 child in 500, and in 1986 it was 1 child in 2000.
By April, which is Autism Awareness Month in the US, there was
a full court press by doctors inside and outside of government to
dismiss any association whatsoever between steep increases in the
numbers of vaccinations given to children during the past 30 years
and corresponding steep increases in the numbers of children
developing autism.
Those doctors know, but a lot of young parents today don’t know,
that the public conversation about vaccine-induced brain inflammation
and chronic brain and immune system dysfunction, including autism,
began 16 years before a study was published in The Lancet in 1998
examining the potential association between the MMR vaccine and
autism.
CDC Study Fails to Confirm Offit's Claim That 10,000 Vaccines Are
Safe for Babies
On Good Friday, April 1, during Easter and Passover observances,
a study conducted and funded by the Centers for Disease Control was
released by the Journal of Pediatrics declaring that increasing
exposure to antibody stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in
vaccines is not associated with risk of autism and, therefore,
vaccines don’t cause autism.
It was a pathetic attempt to validate a Machiavellian hypothesis
forwarded in 2002 by pediatric vaccine developer Paul Offit claiming
that an infant could safely respond to 10,000 vaccines given at any
one time.
However, an eighth grade science class student with an
elementary understanding of health research methods, the bioactivity
of various vaccine ingredients and the difference between naturally
acquired and vaccine acquired immunity could figure out that the
absence of an unvaccinated control group meant the study was fatally
flawed. It proved absolutely nothing about the potential relationship
between administration of multiple vaccinations in early childhood
and the development of autism among genetically diverse children
with and without increased biological susceptibility to adverse
responses to vaccination.
Pediatricians Label Social Networking Parents 'Nonconformers'
On April 15, Pediatric News published an online survey stating
the obvious: a person’s knowledge, values and beliefs, as well as
the opinions of friends and families in social networks, strongly
influences decisions about vaccination. Parents, who expressed
doubts about vaccine safety and used alternative vaccine schedules
for their children, were pejoratively labeled as "nonconformers."
Pediatricians commenting on the survey suggested that non-
conforming parents did not base their vaccine decisions on rational
logic and scientific evidence because they were influenced by
nonconforming friends and misleading information on nonconforming
websites. Apparently, there was no consideration given to the
fact that nonconforming parents found the poor science and empty
rhetoric buttressing one-size-fits-all vaccine policies entirely unconvincing.
Journalist and Magazine Attacked for Article Questioning Gardasil Safety
April was also the month that a veteran journalist and radio
show host was personally attacked by pediatricians and public health
officials in Buffalo, New York for daring to write an article
questioning the safety of the Gardasil vaccine and urging parents to
make informed vaccine choices. Outraged doctors threatened to
financially ruin the magazine that published the article by destroying
the magazine’s paid advertising base unless the article was retracted.
Offit Plays Class and Race Card to Demonize Smart Nonconforming Parents
By the end of April, a CNN reporter quoted doctors blaming
outbreaks of whooping cough, measles and mumps on unvaccinated people
in developed nations, who spread their vaccine safety doubts on the Internet
and jeopardize the health of people around the world.
Crassly playing both the class AND race card, the magical thinking, attention
seeking Dr. Offit offered the opinion that It is the
upper middle class, well-educated Caucasian parents who are shunning
vaccines. They have generally gone to graduate school, are in
positions of management and are used to being in control, he said
flatly.
Doctors playing the blame game apparently disagree about whether
nonconforming parents asking questions about vaccines are simply
stupid and irrational or are just over-educated, rich white folks
refusing to acknowledge the intellectual superiority and infallibility
of those with M.D., PhD or MPH written after their names regardless
of the color of their skin or how much money they make.
Doctors like Offit, Halsey, Plotkin, Omer, and others denying
vaccine risks are blaming everyone but themselves for the miserable
statistic that 1 child in 50 in America develops a type of brain and
immune dysfunction labeled autism when it used to be 1 child in 2000
before they dumped three times as many vaccinations on babies.
Regression into Poor Health After Vaccination: A Universal Experience
What doctors drowning in denialism refuse to accept is that,
today, everybody knows somebody who was healthy, got vaccinated and
was never healthy again. That pattern of regression into poor health,
that universal experience of suffering after use of a pharmaceutical
product that has a long, well documented history of risks and failures,
is why the public conversation about health and vaccination in the
21st century must and will continue. It will continue until doctors,
who are pushing more and more vaccines on children and adults already
more highly vaccinated and sicker than ever, come up with a much
better explanation than it’s bad genes, better dignosing or all a coincidence.
Vaccine Makers and Doctors Shielded from Liability Have Ethical Duty
In the US, vaccine manufacturers are shielded from product
liability in civil court and doctors promoting and administering
vaccines are also shielded from vaccine injury lawsuits. Doctors
without legal accountability have an even greater ethical duty to
encourage patients and parents of minor children to become educated
about all risks and honor the vaccination decisions patients or
parents make, even if the doctor does not personally agree with the
decision made.
Freedom of thought, speech and conscience are deeply valued and
constitutionally protected rights in America. The public trust in
the integrity of public health policies is destroyed when defensive
doctors unwilling to share decision-making power fail to respect the
human right to informed consent to medical risk taking and behave
like schoolyard bullies instead of compassionate healers committed
to, first, doing no harm.
Thank You Barbara Loe Fisher
God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.
Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment