"The War In Medicine"

  Case Study of Scientific Corruption

             Continued From Last Post.

Actually, there were multiple experiments done by Cameron and Pauling.

Their treatment protocol was very simple:

1) Pick cancer patients who were diagnosed as terminal,
2) Who had never had chemotherapy or radiation (there were exceptions),
3) Give them 10 grams (or more) of liquid Vitamin C every day (instead of
chemotherapy) (note: these days people use crystal Vitamin C or pills),
4) For the rest of their lives,
5) Then measure how long they live.

It's a pretty simple protocol. A high school student could easily follow
their protocol. The results of their experiments were also very simple,
the patients who took Vitamin C lived several times longer than patients
who took orthodox treatments with chemotherapy and radiation. Some of
their patients (remember all of their patients were considered terminal)
went into complete remission, just using Vitamin C.

Their studies were designed to compare a Vitamin C treatment protocol,
without chemotherapy and radiation, to a typical orthodox protocol using
chemotherapy and radiation.

Note that they did not use a tricky statistic, such as determining what
percentage of the patients lived for one year, but rather they measured
how long each patient lived.

Their experiments proved beyond reasonable doubt that Vitamin C is a
superior treatment for terminal patients versus orthodox therapy. Excuse
me for stating the obvious, but if it is a superior treatment for
terminal patients, then it is a superior treatment, instead of orthodox
treatments, for the vast majority of cancer patients.

Orthodox treatments are extremely painful, destroy a person's immune
system, destroy their vital organs, and have a whole slew of other
painful and dangerous side-effects. Vitamin C is an antioxidant that: is
completely painless, builds the immune system and adds quality time and
quantity time to the life of terminal cancer patients.

So you might wonder, since these studies were done many years ago, why do
doctors today use toxic chemotherapy instead of Vitamin C, and the other
vitamins of Hoffer?

Big Pharma's Reaction To Cameron and Pauling

Well, it turns out that Big Pharma was not happy with Linus Pauling and
Dr. Cameron. It was time for damage control. There was a smear campaign
to discredit Dr. Pauling that continues to this day. The reason is that
the patients who took Vitamin C did not take chemotherapy. Thus, Big
Pharma did not stand to profit from the extended lives of these patients.
In fact, Big Pharma did not stand to profit from these patients at all.

Now you know why Big Pharma has been attacking Vitamin C and Linus
Pauling for many years. If cancer patients took mega doses of Vitamin C,
instead of chemotherapy, they would live longer and have far less pain. I
will translate that into something a businessman can understand: less
"earnings per share" for Big Pharma.

The truth about what Cameron and Pauling had discovered had to be
crushed. But since the studies were already published, and because
Pauling was already world-famous, what was Big Pharma going to do? The
answer was to conduct bogus studies which came to different conclusions.
But how can a scientific study follow the same treatment protocol and
come to a different conclusion? It can't. However, what can be done is to
refuse to follow the same protocol and use very fancy statistical tricks.

That is exactly what happened.

                   Continued In Next Post

--------------------------

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com
Income for the 98% that fail in Their Internet Business.
http://bit.ly/Y1ko5k