The Health Ramifications of Mass Medicating with Fluoride.

                            SPONSORS

                The Solution For Disease FREE Health.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative Cancer Treatments

                      http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


           Continued From Last Post

The Health Ramifications of Mass Medicating with Fluoride.

    In the early 1990’s Dr. William Marcus, a senior scientist with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), released a memorandum outlining
the adverse effects of fluoride in drinking water. For example, tests
showed fluoridated drinking water caused bone and liver cancer in animals.

Dr. Marcus was subsequently terminated from his position with the EPA.
He later won a wrongful termination suit against the agency and was

reinstated, as it was determined that “his employment was terminated
solely because he questioned and opposed the EPA’s fluoride policy.”

    So much for scientific freedom and public safety.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),41 percent
of American adolescents now have dental fluorosis —unattractive discoloration
and mottling of the teeth that indicateoverexposure to fluoride. But that's not all.
Evidence suggests thatswallowing fluoride can also cause:

Weakened bones, and fatal bone cancer (osteosarcoma)

Impaired mental development, lowered IQ, and dementia

Gastrointestinal problems

Hyperactivity and/or lethargy

Arthritic symptoms

Kidney issues

Lowered thyroid function

Chronic fatigue

Disrupted immune system

This is what the science is telling us about the ramifications of fluoride
use. And yet, rather than taking the precautionary approach and stopping
fluoridation until we know more, our policymakers continue to blindly forge
ahead; refusing to give the scientific evidence the attention it deserves.

Interestingly enough, a toxicology review is actually required by statute to
ensure that fluoride-delivery agents, such as Hexafluorosilicic acid, are
safe. But no such review exists for Hexafluorosilicic acid... It is a man-
made, bioaccumulative toxin, and you cannot use dilution as a defense for
adding a contaminant to public drinking water.

And yet, it’s being done...

According to the EPA’s local's president, Bill Hirzy, a chemist in the EPA's
Office of Toxic Substances, water fluoridation remains a government policy
because of “institutional inertia [and] embarrassment among government
agencies that have been promoting this stuff as safe.”

In October last year, the world’s leading expert on fluoride toxicity and
author of "The Case Against Fluoride," Dr. Paul Connett, gave the following
presentation in Wichita, Kansas. In it, he addresses the dangers of adding
fluoride to communal water supplies, and the health risks associated with
drinking fluoridated water.

Why is the American Dental Association Ignoring the Science?

    According to a 2006 report on water fluoridation produced by the US
National Research Council, the benefits from fluoride are topical only,
and cannot be achieved through ingestion. It also detailed positive

associations between fluoride ingestion and bone fractures, cancer,
reduced IQ and dementia.

    Meanwhile, the American Dental Association (ADA), which is mired in
conflicts of interest with the amalgam industry, has had “amalgam safety”
and “universal water fluoridation” as their top two highest goals for their
National Oral Health Agenda as of 2009. Furthermore, the ADA, one of the
most influential trade lobbies in the US,  believes that:

  “All communal water supplies

containing less than the optimal level of fluoride should be adjusted
to an optimum level. Toward this end, the ADA is urging Congress and
state legislators to make capacity-building funds readily available to
help communities establish, upgrade and maintain an effective public
water fluoridation infrastructure.”

    The ADA spent $2.56 million on their lobbying efforts last year, and
more than half of its lobbyists (11 out of 20) have previously held
government jobs, again demonstrating the revolving doors between government
and industry. This is a key feature found among most highly effective
lobbying groups.

    The ADA is also one of the most secretive when it comes to its funding.

It was one of just a handful of groups that declined to provide information
to The Chronicle about their responses to Senator Charles E. Grassley, who
in 2009 asked 33 nonprofit health and medical groups to report how much money
they received from pharmaceutical, medical-device, and insurance companies,
and how they disclose such information to the public.

    The association has also spent much of its time defending the dental
profession against lawsuits that charge the mercury used in fillings causes
health problems.

    The ADA has close ties with the world’s leading supplier of dental
mercury (amalgam) fillings, Henry Schein, and has steadfastly refused to
admit that placing neurotoxic mercury in your mouth might not be a good
idea.

In recent years, many dentists have reconsidered this archaic practice and
about half of all American dentists are now mercury-free, but the ADA’s
dismissal of the evidence has led to low-income children being
disproportionately harmed. Amalgam is still the primary filling material
used in many underprivileged children due to it being the least expensive
alternative. Henry Schein also makes sure uninsured children receive their
toxic wares via “charity” programs like the annual Give Kids a Smile program
to which it donates dental supplies.

           Continued

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com