Friday, May 23, 2014

Could a ketogenic diet eventually be a "standard of care" drug-free treatment for cancer?


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.


PLEASE PASS THIS BLOG ON AND PLEASE TWEET THIS BLOG.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


                    SPONSORS



  ALL-IN-ONE Marketing & Follow-up system
  with 100% Residuals.
      http://leadsystemnetwork.com/mtxlgn



     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments
              http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw


      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 
              http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i



By Dr. Mercola


    Could a ketogenic diet eventually be a "standard of care"
drug-free treatment for cancer? Personally, I believe it's
absolutely crucial, for whatever type of cancer you're trying
to address, and hopefully some day it will be adopted as a
first line of treatment.

    A ketogenic diet calls for eliminating all but non-
starchy vegetable carbohydrates, and replacing them with
healthy fats and high-quality protein.

    The premise is that since cancer cells need glucose to
thrive, and carbohydrates turn into glucose in your body,
then lowering the glucose level in your blood though carb
and protein restriction literally starves the cancer cells into
oblivion. Additionally, low protein intake tends to minimize
the mTOR pathway that accelerates cell proliferation.

    This type of diet, in which you restrict all but non-starchy
vegetable carbs and replace them with low to moderate
amounts of high-quality protein and high amounts of
beneficial fat, is what I recommend for everyone, whether you
have cancer or not. It's a diet that will help optimize your
weight and all chronic degenerative disease. Eating this way
will help you convert from carb burning mode to fat burning.

    Dr. Thomas Seyfried is one of the leading pioneer
academic researchers in promoting how to treat cancer
nutritionally. He's been teaching neurogenetics and
neurochemistry as it relates to cancer treatment at Yale
University and Boston College for the past 25 years.

    He's written over 150 peer-reviewed scientific articles
and book chapters, and has also published a book, Cancer as a
Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention
of Cancer.

Ketogenic Diet Accepted as First Line Approach for Epilepsy;

Is Cancer Next?

    The ketogenic diet has actually been used for managing
seizures in children for quite some time. While Dr. Seyfried
and his team worked on brain cancer and epilepsy in mice,
one of his students suggested investigating whether or not a
ketogenic diet might also be effective against tumors.

    So, in the late '90s, they began dovetailing their work
on ketogenic diets and epilepsy and cancer together,
eventually bringing them to a better understanding of how
changing your whole-body metabolic state can be effective in
targeting and eliminating tumor cells.

    Interestingly, clinical medicine has recognized the
ketogenic diet as a valuable option in the treatment of
epilepsy since the late 90's.

        "I served as the organizer for the Ketogenic Diet
Special Interest Group at the American Epilepsy Society,
" Dr.Seyfried says.

        "We initially started as a small focus group with the
folks from Johns Hopkins Medical School, where the diet has
had its greatest use and impact. And then we started to grow
and substantially increase interest mainly through the
efforts of Jim Abrahams.

        Jim started the Charlie Foundation for his son Charlie,
who went through a near-death experience from seizures
and was rescued using ketogenic diets. His colleague, Meryl
Streep, the famous movie actress, became very involved in this.

        Now the ketogenic diet is receiving considerable attention
in the epilepsy community as a first line of approach. Although
this is still not widely accepted, I have to admit that the ketogenic
diet is now recognized as an important component for the
management of refractory seizures in children."

    According to Dr. Seyfried, the mechanism by which the
ketogenic diet manages seizures is not nearly as clear as the
way the ketogenic diet manages cancer. This is ironic
considering that it's barely known, let alone applied, within
oncology circles, while it's already a first line of
treatment for epilepsy. In the case of cancer, it's well-
established that it's the glucose reduction that kills the
cancer cells.

Cancer Is a Mitochondrial Metabolic Disease

    Dr. Seyfried has developed a process called metabolic
control analysis, which essentially analyzes the metabolic
flux through different pathways that occurs when you
transition your body from one major fuel source to another
major fuel source, to maintain energy homeostasis in your

body. Many believe or are under the impression that cancer
is primarily a genetic disease, but Dr. Seyfried dispels such
notions.

        "We're not going to make major advances in the
management of cancer until it becomes recognized as a
metabolic disease. But in order to do that, you have to
present a massive counterargument against the gene theory
of cancer," he says.

        "One of the key issues here is that if you transplant
the nucleus of a cancer cell into a normal cell, you don't
get cancer cells. You can actually get normal tissues and
sometimes a whole normal organism from the nucleus of a
cancer cell. Now, if the tumors are being driven by driver
genes all these kinds of mutations and things that we hear
about how is it possible that all of this is changed when you
place this cancer nucleus into the cytoplasm of a cell with
normal mitochondria?

        The gene theory cannot address this. It clearly argues
strongly against the concept that genes are driving this
process.  Actually, a very few people inherit genes that
predispose them to cancer. Most people inherit genes that
prevent cancer. And those few genes that are inherited the
germ line like the BRCA1 mutations, B53, and a few other
veryrare cancers these inherited mutations appear to disrupt
the function of the mitochondria."

    According to Dr. Seyfried, the mitochondria the main
power generators in your cells are the central point in the
origin of most cancers. Your mitochondria can be damaged
not only by inherited mutations, thereby increasing your risk
for a particular type of cancer, such as the BRCA1 and BRCA2
mutations that increase your risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
They can also be damaged by environmental factors, such as
toxins and radiation, both ionizing and non-ionizing.

Over time, damage to your mitochondria can lead to dysfunction
and tumor formation.

        "It's ultimately a disease of the mitochondrial
energy metabolism, which is the origin of the disease," Dr.
Seyfried says." Once the mitochondria become dysfunctional or
insufficient in ability, mutations will occur. The drugs that
have been developed based on the genome projects have been
largely ineffective in providing long-term care and are
associated with toxic effects. As long as the field continues
to focus on that part of the disease, which is a downstream
epiphenomenon, there will be no major advances in the field
simply because that's not the relevant aspect of the disease."

Sugar Is the Primary Fuel for Most Cancers

    Controlling your blood-glucose leptin and insulin levels
through diet, exercise and emotional stress relief can be one
of the most crucial components to a cancer recovery program.
These factors are also crucial in order to prevent cancer in
the first place.In 1931, the Nobel Prize was awarded to
German researcher Dr. Otto Warburg, who discovered that
cancer cells have a fundamentally different energy metabolism
compared to healthy cells, and that malignant tumors tend to
feed on sugar. More recently, researchers discovered that
while cancer cells feed on both glucose and fructose,
pancreatic tumor cells use fructose specifically to divide
and proliferate.

    Dr. Seyfried's work confirms that sugar is the primary
fuel for cancer, and that by restricting sugar and providing
an alternate fuel, namely fat, you can dramatically reduce
the rate of growth of cancer. He explains:

    "When we're dealing with glucose and cancer management,
we know from a large number of studies that if respiration of
the tumor is ineffective, in order to survive, the cells must
use an alternative source of energy, which is fermentation.
We know that glucose is the primary fuel for fermentation.
Fermentation becomes a primary energy-generating process
in the tumor cell. By targeting the fuel for that process, we
then have the capability of potentially managing the disease."

    The strategy Dr. Seyfried suggests is a low-carb, low to
moderate protein, high-fat diet, which will effectively lower
your blood sugar. This is an easily measurable parameter that
you can check using a diabetic blood glucose meter. This type
of diet, called a ketogenic diet, will also elevate ketone
bodies, as fat is metabolized to ketones that your body can
burn in the absence of food. When combined with calorie
restriction, the end result will put your body in a metabolic
state that is inhospitable to cancer cells.

        "Ketones is a fat breakdown product that can replace
glucose as a major fuel for many of the organs and especially
our brain," he says.

    Tumor cells, however, cannot use ketone bodies because of
their respiratory insufficiency. So the ketogenic diet represents
an elegant, non-toxic way to target and marginalize tumor cells.
It also allows you to dramatically lower your glucose levels, as
the ketones will protect your body against any hypoglycemia
that might otherwise be induced by carb restriction.

    All of the newer cells in your body will be transitioned
to these effective ketones, thereby preventing them from
damage from hypoglycemia. At the same time, the tumor cells
are now marginalized and under tremendous metabolic stress.

It's a whole body therapy you need to bring the whole body
into this metabolic state," he explains.

    "We like to call it a new state of metabolic homeostasis:
a state where ketones have reached the steady state level in
your blood and glucose has reached a steady lower level in
your blood... If it's done right and implemented right, it has
powerful therapeutic benefits on the majority of people
who suffer from various kinds of cancers. Because all cancers
have primarily the same metabolic defect."

Thank You  Dr. Mercola



                  Continued 5/26/14


 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

 Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

What Is High Blood Pressure (HBP) And Why Is It Dangerous?


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.

PLEASE PASS THIS BLOG ON AND PLEASE TWEET THIS BLOG.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

                    SPONSORS


           UNLIMITED NINJA Fun FREE
      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE
       http://trkur.com/tk?o=12331&p=151811


     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments
              http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw


      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 
              http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


Blood pressure is the force your blood exerts on your arteries as it flows through your body. If you have high blood pressure it means that your blood is exerting too much force on your arteries and is making your heart's job--pumping blood--more difficult than it should be.

Now, your heart is a powerful and efficient muscle, but if it's forced to work too hard for too long it can enlarge, wear out or fail, causing a heart attack, stroke, aneurysm... and an early death.

When you have your blood pressure taken, you're given two numbers referred to as your Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure.

Your Systolic blood pressure is the measurement of the pressure your blood exerts on your arteries when your heart beats, while your Diastolic blood pressure is the measurement of the pressure your blood exerts on your arteries when your heart is at rest.
What's The Difference Between Normal Blood Pressure and High Blood Pressure?

For an average adult:
Blood Pressure Stage                Systolic     Diastolic
Normal                                            120              80
Pre-Hypertension                      120-139        80-99
Stage One Hypertension           140-159        90-99
Stage Two Hypertension              160+           100+

If your blood pressure consistently reads in the Hypertension or Pre-hypertension categories, then you need to take immediate and lasting action if you want to live a long and healthy life.

According to the American Heart Association, about 65 Million Americans over the age of 20 have high blood pressure. That's about one in three adults.

In 2003 more than 52,000 Americans died from complications related to high blood pressure. Between 1993 and 2004 the rate of death from high blood pressure rose nearly 30 percent. 

http://bit.ly/1jPInyb

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com


Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Monday, May 19, 2014

Scientific Studies...Cancer


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.

PLEASE PASS THIS BLOG ON AND PLEASE TWEET THIS BLOG.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

                    SPONSORS


           UNLIMITED NINJA Fun FREE
      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE
       http://trkur.com/tk?o=12331&p=151811


     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments
              http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw


      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 
              http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i




Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.

 More on Scientific Studies

I have talked about how Big Pharma makes a worthless substance look good. They use scientists who masterfully compare one type of toxic sludge to another type of toxic sludge. Or they compare how the toxic sludge does at treating symptoms. Or they use fancy statistical tricks. Or they design the study to insure no substantive information comes out of the study. An so on and so forth.

But the scientific industry (they are certainly not real scientists, they are more of an industry) are frequently given another assignment: make a good substance look bad!! In other words, they are sometimes assigned to make a bad substance look good, but in other cases they are assigned to make a good substance look bad.

Let us talk more about the Vitamin C treatment of Cameron and Pauling. Their study was profound, and it could have led to treatments that saved many, many lives. But it was not profitable and it did not make doctors look like heroes.

What do you think the reaction of orthodox medicine was to this great discovery? Do you think they tried to find ways to use this discovery and even enhance it? Don’t be absurd. Their reaction was identical to their reaction to all of the other great discoveries in alternative medicine, they wanted to bury the truth.

But one of the participants of the Vitamin C study was a two-time Nobel Prize winner. Linus Pauling had already won a Nobel Prize in chemistry and he won the Nobel Peace Prize. His integrity was unquestioned. They had made a great discovery. Thus orthodox medicine could not simply bury his studies. They decided to use a tactic to destroy truth that had been refined and perfected by the tobacco industry. That tactic was to create new studies that were designed to distract attention from the truth. In this case, however, they had to make a good substance look bad.

But how in the world do you make a good substance look bad? Orthodox medicine called upon Dr. Moertel of the Mayo Clinic to design three bogus studies, which did not, by any stretch of the imagination, follow the same treatment protocol, or the same patient selection protocol or the same statistical evaluation protocol, as Cameron and Pauling had used (actually, Dr. Moertel was not involved in the third study).

Now note this carefully, if the Mayo Clinic wanted to know the truth about the Cameron/Pauling studies, they would have taken great care to follow their treatment protocol, patient selection protocol and statistical evaluation protocol exactly!! To use high school students again, a group of high school students could have followed the Cameron/Pauling protocols perfectly.

But Dr. Moertel was assigned to make a good substance look bad, thus he could not follow the same protocols as Pauling and Cameron, he had to modify the protocols in order to come to a different conclusion. The Mayo Clinic took great care to make sure they did not follow the Cameron/Pauling protocols. Since they didn’t follow protocols, they didn’t come to the same conclusions.

So who do you think that orthodox medicine, the government, the media, quackwatch, etc. quotes when the subject of Vitamin C and cancer comes up? Obviously, they quote the Mayo Clinic studies, not the three studies (done in Scotland, Canada and Japan) that did follow the same treatment and evaluation protocols.

Here is the key point  how can they disprove a study unless they follow the same protocols and come to a different conclusion?? They can’t. If you don’t follow the original protocol exactly, and if you come to a different conclusion, you have not proven anything!! If you want to disprove something you must follow the exact protocols. Moertel and company didn’t do that, yet they claimed to have disproven Cameron and Pauling.

With three bogus studies to tell the world about, the Cancer Industry claimed that Moertel and company followed the right protocol, and because Pauling and Cameron did not follow the Moertel protocols that therefore the Pauling and Cameron studies were false!! If your brain just exploded, I fully understand.

Do you understand what they did? They agreed that a person should follow the same protocol in order to disprove something. However, they made it appear that the Moertel protocol was superior and that because Pauling and Cameron did not follow the Mortel protocol the results of the Cameron and Pauling study were false. I have an entire chapter in my other free, online eBook on the Pauling/Cameron/Moertel studies.

My point is that for all bad substances (e.g. tobacco) there are two kinds of studies: studies that make the substance look bad (because it is bad) and studies that make the substance look good, or at least not harmful (because they are funded by Big Tobacco or Big Pharma). Likewise, for all good substances (e.g. Vitamin C) there are two kinds of studies, those that make the substance look good (because it is good) and those that make it look bad, or worthless (because they are funded by Big Pharma). This gives the FDA a blank check to approve or disapprove any substance, whether it is good or bad.

In addition, Congress has given the FDA, NIH, NCI, etc. a big club to legally stop any study (that is not totally under the control of orthodox medicine) that compares alternative treatments to chemotherapy. This means item #2 above is impossible to accomplish for any type of alternative treatment, meaning that without item #2, the gathering of item #3 statistics are impossible to accumulate! The charts mentioned previously can never be made!

If anyone thinks for one minute that the FDA is corrupt and Congress is a group of saints, they need to have a reality check. Congress created the FDA, Congress lets them do what they want, and Congress only criticizes the FDA when the media cannot suppress what they have done. In other words, Congress only criticizes the FDA when their re-election might be threatened. And that never happens.

But let us not forget the scientists who bow to Big Pharma. Lest you think that scientists cannot be corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry, as they were by the tobacco industry, consider this quote:

    In June [2002], the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the most respected medical journals, made a startling announcement. The editors declared that they were dropping their policy stipulating that authors of review articles of medical studies could not have financial ties to drug companies whose medicines were being analyzed.

    The reason? The journal could no longer find enough independent experts. Drug company gifts and consulting fees are so pervasive that in any given field, you cannot find an expert who has not been paid off in some way by the industry. So the journal settled for a new standard: Their reviewers can have received no more than $10,000 [per year] from companies whose work they judge. Isn’t that comforting?

    This announcement by the New England Journal of Medicine is just the tip of the iceberg of a scientific establishment that has been pervasively corrupted by conflicts of interest and bias, throwing doubt on almost all scientific claims made in the biomedical field.

    The standard announced in June was only for the reviewers. The actual authors of scientific studies in medical journals are often bought and paid for by private drug companies with a stake in the scientific results. While the NEJM and some other journals disclose these conflicts, others do not. Unknown to many readers is the fact that the data being discussed was often collected and analyzed by the maker of the drug involved in the test.

    http://www.healtoronto.com/big_pharm.html

But even this quote does not pinpoint how the pharmaceutical industry has achieved total suppression of truth.

Think for a moment about the difference between how the tobacco industry suppressed the truth between 1954 and the 1990s, and how the pharmaceutical industry is suppressing the truth today. Try to isolate and pinpoint the huge difference between their tactics before reading on

With the tobacco industry, the tobacco sponsored studies did not find a relationship between tobacco and lung cancer, and other diseases. On the other hand, non-tobacco industry studies did consistently find a relationship between tobacco and lung cancer, etc.

Likewise, the pharmaceutical industry studies on aspartame did not find any health problems with aspartame. On the other hand, the non-pharmaceutical industry studies did find health problems with aspartame.

As you might suspect, the pharmaceutical industry studies on orthodox treatments do not find any problems with orthodox cancer treatments (how can you find a problem by comparing your old toxic sludge to your new toxic sludge). However, and here is the difference, because of the FDA, NCI and AMA there are no scientific studies on alternative cancer treatments!!! They are not legal. They are not allowed.

Do you see the difference? Anyone who wants to find the truth about alternative cancer treatments are not allowed to do studies! The pharmaceutical industry has gone a giant leap beyond what the tobacco industry was able to do. There are NO truthful studies to dilute!

For example, during the 42 years the tobacco industry was funding their many hundreds of bogus scientific studies, suppose a government agency had the authority to block ANY study that was not funded by the tobacco industry? That is exactly the level of suppression of truth that the pharmaceutical industry has achieved  they have been able to block all cancer studies that are not funded by the pharmaceutical industry or our corrupt government!!! It is not that these studies are not being done, it is that the government does not give them any official status (more will be said about this below).

You have now heard a few of the good things about alternative cancer treatments (truth table #3) and a few of the bad things about orthodox cancer treatments (truth table #4). Let’s analyze why, throughout your life, you have only heard the items in truth table #1 and truth table #2.


Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.




 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com


Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Friday, May 16, 2014

What Are the Sources of Your Daily Calories?


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.

PLEASE PASS THIS BLOG ON AND PLEASE TWEET THIS BLOG.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


                    SPONSORS



           UNLIMITED NINJA Fun FREE
      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE
       http://trkur.com/tk?o=12331&p=151811


     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments
              http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw


      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 
              http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i



By Dr. Mercola


    According to the 2010 Report by the Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, the top 10 sources of calories in the American diet are:

    1. Grain-based desserts (cakes, cookies, donuts, pies, crisps, cobblers, and
        granola bars)  139 calories a day

    2. Yeast breads, 129 calories a day
   
    3. Chicken and chicken-mixed dishes, 121 calories a day
   
    4. Soda, energy drinks, and sports drinks, 114 calories a day
   
    5. Pizza, 98 calories a day    

    6. Alcoholic beverages

    7. Pasta and pasta dishes

    8. Mexican mixed dishes

    9. Beef and beef-mixed dishes

    10. Dairy desserts

    As you can see, on the whole it’s easy to see that the dietary roots of the American weight problem is linked to carbs sugars (primarily fructose) and grains in the form of processed foods and sweet drinks. You’ve often heard me state that soda is the number one source of calories in the US diet, which it was, based on the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The updated NHANES survey above covers nutritional data from 2005-2006, placing grain-based foods in the top two slots.

    Still, soda comes in at number four, and I still believe many people, particularly teenagers, probably still get a majority of their calories from fructose-rich drinks like soda.

    I strongly recommend ditching all sodas as a first step to clean up your diet and help normalize your insulin levels. I believe it’s one of the most powerful actions you can take to improve your health and lower your risk of disease and long-term chronic health conditions. Especially when you consider that just one can of soda per day can add as much as 15 pounds to your weight over the course of a single year, and increases your risk of diabetes by 85 percent! If you struggle with an addiction to soda and other sweets, I strongly recommend you consider Turbo Tapping. It's a simple and clever use of the Emotional Freedom Technique, designed to resolve many aspects of an issue in a concentrated period of time.

My Recommended Fructose Allowance

    As a standard recommendation, I advise keeping your TOTAL fructose consumption below 25 grams per day. For most people it would also be wise to limit your fructose from fruit to 15 grams or less, as you're virtually guaranteed to consume "hidden" sources of fructose through processed food and condiments.

    There certainly are exceptions to this rule. People who are aggressively exercising can consume far more, especially if consuming the calories around the time of exercise, but generally, to optimize health, most will benefit from restricting their fructose input.

    Fifteen grams of fructose is not much -- it represents two bananas, one-third cup of raisins, or two Medjool dates. Remember, the average 12-ounce can of soda contains 40 grams of sugar, at least half of which is fructose, so one can of soda alone would exceed your daily allotment. If your insulin and leptin signaling is fine and you have normal body weight and don’t suffer from diabetes, high blood pressure or high cholesterol, then consuming more fruit is reasonable.

    In his book, The Sugar Fix, Dr. Richard Johnson includes detailed tables showing the content of fructose in different foods -- an information base that isn't readily available when you're trying to find out exactly how much fructose is in various foods. You can also find an abbreviated listing of the fructose content of common fruits in this previous article.

Key Point: Replace Carbs with Healthful Fats!

    Keep in mind that when we're talking about harmful carbs, we're only referring to grains and sugars, NOT vegetable carbs. When you cut grain/sugar carbs, you then need to radically increase:

        The amount of vegetables you eat since, by volume, the grains you need to trade out are denser than vegetables, and
        Healthful fats such as avocados, coconut oil, organic pastured egg yolks, raw grass fed organic butter, olives, and nuts such as almonds and pecans.

    Avoid highly processed and genetically engineered omega-6 oils like corn, canola and soy as they will upset your omega-6/3 ratio. Of course you want to avoid all trans fats, but contrary to popular advice, saturated fats are a key component of a healthy diet that will promote weight loss.

    A reasonable goal will be to have as much as 50-70 percent of your diet as healthy fat, which will radically reduce your carbohydrate intake. It can be helpful to remember that fat is far more satiating than carbs, so if you have cut down on carbs and feel ravenous, this is a sign that you have not replaced them with sufficient amounts of healthy fat.

    Most people will likely notice massive improvement in their health by following this approach as they are presently consuming FAR more grain and bean carbohydrates in their diet, and any reduction will be a step in the right direction. To help you get started on the right track, review my Nutritional Plan, which guides you through these dietary changes one step at a time.

You Can Avoid Becoming a Statistic

    Perhaps one of the most powerful scientific discoveries to emerge in the past several years is that the old adage a calorie is a calorie is patently false. Furthermore, the idea that in order to lose weight all you have to do is expend more calories than you consume is equally false. The research clearly demonstrates that even if you control the number of calories you eat, if those calories come from fructose, you are at increased risk of obesity and pre-diabetes, which includes insulin and leptin resistance, fatty liver, high blood pressure and high triglycerides.

    Conventional advice tells us that obesity is simply the result of eating too many calories and not exercising enough. However, Dr. Johnson’s research, discussed above, shows that a high fructose diet is one of the keys to trapping excess fat and developing metabolic disorders, and that as soon as you throw fructose into the mix, calories in versus calories out is no longer a functional equation.

    In short, limiting fructose in all its forms, along with other sugars, is imperative in order to avoid flipping the fat switch that can trigger your body to accumulate excess fat. And replacing sugar and grain carbs with vegetables and healthful fats is the key to normalizing your weight, metabolic function, and overall health.

    Intermittent fasting is another powerful tool that will help you transition your body from obtaining the majority of its fuel from glucose stored as glycogen in your muscles and liver, to the fat stored in your tissues. This is one of the most effective ways to burn your excess body fat, become lean, and eliminate sugar cravings.


Thank You  Dr. Mercola      



 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com


Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Killer at Large...


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

I know I should NOT post negative information because it
turns people off. SORRY...Part of life is negative and I
DON'T run from it.


PLEASE PASS THIS BLOG ON AND PLEASE TWEET THIS BLOG.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


                    SPONSORS



           UNLIMITED NINJA Fun FREE
      Start Your NINJA Journey...NOW...FREE
       http://trkur.com/tk?o=12331&p=151811


     World's #1 Publisher of Information About 
     Alternative Cancer Treatments
              http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw


      The Solution For Disease FREE Health. 
              http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i



By Dr. Mercola


    Killer at Large, a documentary film by Steven
Greenstreet, tackles the topic of obesity, a problem of truly
epic proportions where misinformation is a major driver.

According to former Surgeon General, Richard Carmona,
quoted in the film:

    Obesity is a terror [threat] within; it's destroying our
society from within and unless we do something about it, the
magnitude of the dilemma will dwarf 9/11 or any other
terrorist event that you can point out.

    Presently, a full two-thirds of Americans are overweight
or obese. Childhood obesity has also skyrocketed, tripling
over the past 30 years. One in three children between the
ages of 10 and 17 is now overweight or obese, and 27 percent
of young adults, 17 to 24, are too heavy to join the
military.

    As a result, today’s children may be the first generation
whose life expectancy is shorter than that of their
parents...

    According to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), an estimated 110,000 Americans die as
a result of obesity each year, and about one-third of all
cancers are directly related to it.

    Data collected from over 60,000 Canadians also shows that
obesity now leads to more doctor visits than smoking. One in
four Americans is also pre-diabetic or diabetic, and heart
disease and cancer, both of which are associated with
obesity, top the mortality charts.

    Clearly, the issue of how to achieve good health has
never been more pertinent to more people. Yet despite the
enormity of this problem, very little is being done to
effectively combat obesity.

    The film examines the causes of obesity and suggests ways
to reverse this deadly trend. Below, I sum up my own
recommendations as well.

    It’s quite clear that conventional diet and health
recommendations are off the mark... Obesity and related
health problems are directly attributable to flawed diet a
diet too high in carbs and poor-quality proteins, and too low
in healthy fats.

    Yet multinational food corporations and biotech companies
have successfully manipulated the system to encourage an
increase in the use of cheap foods that contribute to the
obesity epidemic.

    A recent report exposing the deep conflicts of interest
between the processed food industry and the trade
organization for food and nutrition professionals in the US
also shatters any illusion you may have had that registered
dieticians will provide you with well-researched, science-
based nutrition advice that will improve your health...

Skyrocketing Obesity Is Related to Misleading You on Health
Issues

    Obesity is the result of inappropriate lifestyle choices,
and unfortunately, our government has done an abysmal job at
disseminating accurate information about diet and health.

It’s one thing for corporations to put out misleading ads
honesty is not in the self-interest of the processed food and
beverage industry. It’s another when the government falls in
line with for-profit deception and becomes a propagator of
corporate propaganda. And this is exactly what has
happened... For example, conventional advice that is driving
public health in the wrong direction includes:

        Cutting calories: Not all calories are created equal,
and counting calories will not help you lose weight if you're
consuming the wrong kind of calories

Choosing diet foods will help you lose weight:

Substances like Splenda (sucralose) and Equal or Nutrasweet
(aspartame) may have zero calories, but your body isn't
fooled. When it gets a "sweet" taste, it expects calories to
follow, and when this doesn't occur it leads to distortions
in your biochemistry that may actually lead to weight gain

        Avoiding saturated fat: The myth that saturated fat
causes heart disease has undoubtedly harmed an incalculable
number of lives over the past several decades, even though it
all began as little more than a scientifically unsupported
marketing strategy for Crisco cooking oil. Most people
(myself included) actually need at least 50 to 70 percent of
their diet as healthful fats such as organic, pastured eggs,
avocados, coconut oil, real butter and grass-fed beef in
order to optimize their health

Reducing your cholesterol to extremely low levels:

Cholesterol is actually NOT the major culprit in heart
disease or any disease, and the guidelines that dictate what
number your cholesterol levels should be to keep you
"healthy" are fraught with conflict of interest -- and have
never been proven to be good for your health

    This is just a tiny sampling of the pervasive misleading
information on weight and obesity disseminated by our
government agencies. A more complete list of conventional
health myths could easily fill several books. The reason
behind this sad state of affairs is the fact that the very
industries that profit from these lies are the ones funding
most of the research; infiltrating our regulatory agencies;
and bribing our political officials to support their
financially-driven agenda through any number of legal, and at
times not so legal, means.

Why Eating Fructose Is More Dangerous than Other Sugars

    Part of what makesfructose so unhealthy is that it is
metabolized by your liver to fat far more rapidly than any
other sugar. The entire burden of metabolizing fructose falls
on your liver, and it promotes visceral fat. This is the
type of fat that collects around your organs and in your
abdominal region and is associated with a greater risk of
heart disease.

    Dr. Robert Lustig, Professor of Pediatrics in the
Division of Endocrinology at the University of California,
has been a pioneer in decoding sugar metabolism, and his work
reveals there are major differences in how different sugars
are broken down and used. For example:

        After eating fructose, virtually all of the metabolic
burden rests on your liver. With glucose or most other
sugars, your liver has to break down only 20 percent. The
metabolism of fructose by your liver creates a long list of
waste products and toxins, including a large amount of uric
acid, which drives up blood pressure and causes gout.

        Every cell in your body, including your brain,
utilizes glucose. Therefore, much of it is "burned up"
immediately after you consume it. By contrast, fructose is
turned into free fatty acids (FFAs), VLDL (the damaging form
of cholesterol), and triglycerides, which get stored as fat.

        The fatty acids created during fructose metabolism
accumulate as fat droplets in your liver and skeletal muscle
tissues, causing insulin resistance and non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease (NAFLD). Insulin resistance progresses to
metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes.

        Fructose is the most lipophilic carbohydrate. In
other words, fructose converts to glycerol-3-phosphate (g-3-
p), which is directly used to turn FFAs into triglycerides.

The more g-3-p you have, the more fat you store. Glucose
does not do this.

        When you eat 120 calories of glucose, less than one
calorie is stored as fat. 120 calories of fructose results in
40 calories being stored as fat.

        Glucose suppresses your hunger hormone ghrelin and
stimulates leptin, which suppresses your appetite. Fructose
has no effect on ghrelin and interferes with your brain's
communication with leptin, resulting in overeating. That
fructose triggers changes in your brain that may lead to
overeating and weight gain has also been confirmed through
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) tests.

The Evolutionary Link Between Fructose Consumption and Fat
Accumulation

    No doubt you’ve heard that consuming more calories than
you burn off is the root of your weight problem. Alas, this
conventional wisdom has been firmly debunked by modern
science. The fact is this: Not all calories count equally. It
is in fact FAR more important to look at the source of the
calories than counting them.

    In short, you do not get fat because you eat too many
calories and don't exercise enough. You get fat because you
eat the wrong kind of calories.

    As explained by Dr. Robert Lustig, fructose is
"isocaloric but not isometabolic." This means you can have
the same amount of calories from fructose or glucose,
fructose and protein, or fructose and fat, but the metabolic
effect will be entirely different despite the identical
calorie count. This is a crucial point that must be
understood.

    The bottom line is that your consumption of
carbohydrates, whether in the form of grains and sugars
(especially fructose), will determine whether or not you're
able to manage your weight and maintain optimal health.
This is because these types of carbs (fructose and grains)
affect the hormone insulin, which is a very potent fat regulator.

Fats and proteins affect insulin to a far lesser degree.

    As long as you keep eating fructose and grains, you're
programming your body to create and store fat...

    Research by another expert in this field, Dr. Richard
Johnson, chief of the Division of Renal Diseases and
Hypertension at the University of Colorado and author of The
Sugar Fix and The Fat Switch, further confirms this. His work
demonstrates that fructose-containing sugars cause obesity,
again not by calories, but by turning on your fat switch a
powerful biological adaptation that causes cells to
accumulate fat in anticipation of scarcity (or hibernation).

His most recent book, The Fat Switch, is of major importance
to anyone who has ever struggled with their weight and/or
persistent health issues. Five basic truths detailed in his
book include:

        Large portions of food and too little exercise are
NOT solely responsible for why you are gaining weight.

        Metabolic Syndrome is actually a healthy adaptive
condition that animals undergo to store fat to help them
survive periods of famine. The problem is that most of us
are always feasting and rarely undergo fasting. As a result,
this beneficial switch actually causes damage to contemporary
man.

        Uric acid is increased by specific foods and causally
contributes to obesity and insulin resistance.

        Fructose-containing sugars cause obesity not by
calories but by turning on the fat switch.

        Effective treatment of obesity requires turning off
your fat switch and improving the function of your cells
mitochondria

    I highly recommend picking up a copy of this book, which
is a useful tool for those struggling with their weight.

Dietary sugar, and fructose in particular, is a significant
tripper of your fat switch, so understanding how sugars of
all kinds affect your weight and health is imperative.


Thank You  Dr. Mercola



                  Continued on 5/16/14


 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.


Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com


Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.