The Importance of Intermittent Fasting

Good Morning Everyone, I don't do this very often, write
a comment on here. I get some hate mail accusing me of
being a fraud. DEATH & HEALTH, to me, are not issues to
be fraudulent or take lightly.

My main reason for this blog is to inform as many people
as I can, that not only cancer, but a lot of other diseases,
can be and are CURED.

Why wouldn't I be accused of being a fraud. What I'm NOT
saying (Directly) is our medical profession is all about money...NOT
CREATING GOOD HEALTH. That in itself is a real threat.

My main message is: We don't have to be "SICK OR DIE"
because treating diseases verses CURING diseases is 2
different subjects. I AM PROOF that curing works and is
cheaper, less suffering (if any) and available. You can
keep your head in the sand (wanted to say another comment)
or take on a new outlook to living.

Thanks for reading and passing on this blog.

               GOD BLESS

Larry


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                     SPONSORS

       The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
               http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


      Prevent Alzheimer's With Natural Remedies!
                 http://bit.ly/H8y8Uz

By Dr. Mercola

The Importance of Intermittent Fasting

    In my experience, the vast majority of people are adapted
to burning arbs as their primary fuel, as opposed to burning
fat. One of the most effective strategies I know of to become
a fat burner is to restrict your eating to within a six- to
eight-hour window, which means you’re fasting for about 16-18
hours each day. This upregulates the enzymes that are designed
to burn fat as a fuel, and downregulates the glucose enzymes.
This kind of intermittent fasting plan can be a useful modality
to help you make the transition to a ketogenic diet.

        That’s the way it started in the clinic for children
with epilepsy. Basically, the child is given a 24-hour and
sometimes 48-hour fast  water only. And then the ketogenic
diet is introduced in relatively measured and small amounts,
Dr. Seyfried says.

        Your body transitions naturally that way. Intermittent
fasting is actually a very strong component of the approach.
A three-day fast is uncomfortable, but it’s certainly doable. It
gets your body into a new metabolic state, and then you can
apply these therapies. The hardest part, I think, of this fasting
is the first three to four days, depending on the individual and
how many times they’ve done this.

        That’s basically trying to break your addiction to
glucose. The removal of glucose from the brain elicits the same
kind of problems or events as you would if you were addicted to
drugs, alcohol, or something like this. You get malaise,
headaches, nausea, lightheadedness. You get all the kinds of
physiological effects that you would get from withdrawal of any
addicting substance. I look at glucose as an addictive substance.It’s
an addictive metabolite. Your brain is comforted by having glucose;
your body is comforted. And when you break that glucose addiction,
you have these particular feelings.

        ... Fasting certainly has remarkable health benefits to
the body: strengthening the mitochondria network system within
the cells of your body. As long as the mitochondria of your
cells remain healthy and functional, it’s very unlikely that
cancer can develop under these particular states.

    Unless you have a very serious disease, I believe it is
best for most people to implement intermittent fasting slowly
over six to eight weeks rather than a three-day complete fast.
You begin by not eating for three hours before you go to bed,
and then gradually extend the time you eat breakfast until you
have skipped breakfast entirely and your first meal of the day
is at lunch time. Of course, you are only consuming non-starchy
vegetables for carbs, low to moderate protein and high-quality
fats. One of the things I’ve noticed is that once you’ve made
the transition from burning carbs to burning fat as your primary
fuel, the desire for junk foods and sugar just disappears like
magic.

The Potential Role of Protein in Cancer Formation

    Glutamine--one of the most common amino acids found in
proteins is another interesting aspect of cancer that Dr.
Seyfried is still investigating. In his opinion, most
oncologists who do cancer metabolism recognize that sugar
(both glucose and fructose) is the prime fuel for driving tumor
growth. However, mounting research also indicates that glucose
and glutamine together act powerfully and synergistically on the
growth of tumor cells.

        These two fuels work together in concert to provide a
continual growth, he says.

    One of my early mentors was Dr. Ron Rosedale. He taught me,
about 20 years ago, about the importance of insulin control and
then, more recently, about the importance of reducing protein
intake, for this very reason. Most Americans likely eat far more
protein than they really need, and this excess could be a factor
in cancer. The Paleo approach makes sense on many levels,
especially with regards to intermittent fasting and lowering
your glucose levels. The Paleo approach is very clear about
reducing grains and any food that raises your blood sugar. But
there are, of course, two other macronutrients left: fat and
protein.

    Many Paleo followers are overly concerned about getting high
amounts of protein, which could increase your glutamine and
branched chained amino acid levels, which in turn tend to
activate mTOR. In some, that could be problematic. According to
Dr. Rosedale’s research, the pathway known as the mammalian
target of rapamycin (mTOR), is controlled by lowering your
protein intake. This pathway may be another metabolic pathway
that helps control and prevent cancer growth.

Calorie Restriction Is a Key Part of the Equation

    Dr. Seyfried, however, is more cautious in his evaluation
of mTOR and reducing protein for cancer prevention. In his view,
the most important aspect of cancer prevention and treatment is
the intermittent fasting, or overall calorie restriction, which
includes eating less of everything, period. But while
calories from carbohydrates should be virtually eliminated,
calories from protein just need to be reduced, while most need
to increase their intake of healthful fats to get a more ideal
ratio of fat to protein. As far as the specific types of fats
recommended, Dr. Seyfried uses medium-chain triglycerides,
i.e. coconut oil, butter, macadamia nuts, and other types of
saturated fats, which is what I’ve long recommended as well.
The saturated fats are converted to ketones much more readily than
polyunsaturated fats, he explains.

    So, keep in mind that for cancer prevention and treatment,
the actual calorie restriction is an important part of the
equation:

        We did some studies on this with our model of glioma...
The mTOR in our model was not dramatically changed by these
metabolic therapies. But I know others have reported it, and
this could be an important component for certain other kinds
of cancers. But my limited work with this did not demonstrate this
to be a major issue, at least in the glioma model that we
looked at. We showed that you could give animals a high-fat,
low-protein diet, as much as they want (zero carbs in this diet),
and their blood glucose was just as high or higher than the mice
that were eating the protein-carb diet.

        It was more or less related to the total consumption of calories.
Most calories boil down to glucose. Proteins will be metabolized to
glucose. Carbs are metabolized to glucose; fatsare not... We don’t get
any therapeutic benefit either inepilepsy or cancer when we allow
the animals or people to eat so much of these high-fat diets as they
want. We get no therapeutic benefit.

        Therapeutic benefit comes from the restriction of the
calories in the diet. The ketogenic diet or a low-carb, low-
protein diet is simply a way to take the sting out of a
therapeutic fast. Because as long as the glucose and ketones
can get into the metabolic range (and you can do it with eating
small amounts of a high-fat diet rather than therapeutic
fasting), then that just makes people feel a little better about
how they’re doing this rather than feeling that I’m starving
to death.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

    I recently interviewed Dr. D’Agostino who is another cancer
as a metabolic disease researcher. He published a recent paper
that shows a phenomenal synergy with a ketogenic diet and the
use of hyperbaric oxygen for cancers that have metastasized.
These types of cancers are notoriously difficult to treat. I
would strongly encourage anyone struggling with this challenge
to consider this type of therapy.

Thank You  Dr. Mercola

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Cancer Is a Mitochondrial Metabolic Disease

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                       SPONSORS

        The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                  http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

            Best Acne Removal Reviews
                 http://bit.ly/VzmzKS

 Dissolve KidneyStones and Pass Them Painlessly.
                http://bit.ly/19QQin1




By Dr. Mercola


             Continued From 3/3/14


    Dr. Seyfried has developed a process called metabolic control
analysis, hich essentially analyzes the metabolic flux through
different pathways that occurs when you transition your body from
one major fuel source to another major fuel source, to maintain
energy homeostasis in your body. Many believe or are under the
impression that cancer is primarily a genetic disease, but Dr.
Seyfried dispels such notions.

        We’re not going to make major advances in the management
of cancer until it becomes recognized as a metabolic disease.
But in order to do that, you have to present a massive
counterargument against the gene theory of cancer, he says.

        One of the key issues here is that if you transplant
the nucleus of a cancer cell into a normal cell, you don’t get
cancer cells. You can actually get normal tissues and sometimes
a whole normal organism from the nucleus of a cancer cell. Now,
if the tumors are being driven by driver genes all these kinds
of mutations and things that we hear about how is it possible
that all of this is changed when you place this cancer nucleus
into the cytoplasm of a cell with normal mitochondria?

        The gene theory cannot address this. It clearly argues
strongly against the concept that genes are driving this
process. Actually, a very few people inherit genes that
predispose them to cancer. Most people inherit genes that
prevent cancer. And those few genes that are inherited the germ line
like the BRCA1 mutations, B53, and a few other very rare cancers
these inherited mutations appear to disrupt the function of the
mitochondria.

    According to Dr. Seyfried, the mitochondria—the main power
generators in your cells—are the central point in the origin
of most cancers. Your mitochondria can be damaged not only by
inherited mutations, thereby increasing your risk for a
particular type of cancer, such as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
that increase your risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They can
also be damaged by environmental factors, such as toxins and
radiation, both ionizing and non-ionizing. Over time, damage
to your mitochondria can lead to dysfunction and tumor formation.

        It’s ultimately a disease of the mitochondrial energy
metabolism, which is the origin of the disease, Dr. Seyfried
says. Once the mitochondria become dysfunctional or insufficient
in ability, mutations will occur. The drugs that have been
developed based on the genome projects have been largely
ineffective in providing long-term care and are associated with
toxic effects. As long as the field continues to focus on that
part of the disease, which is a downstream epiphenomenon, there
will be no major advances in the field simply because that’s not
the relevant aspect of the disease.

Sugar Is the Primary Fuel for Most Cancers

    Controlling your blood-glucose leptin and insulin levels
through diet, exercise and emotional stress relief can be one
of the most crucial components to a cancer recovery program.
These factors are also crucial in order to prevent cancer in
the first place.In 1931, the Nobel Prize was awarded to German
researcher Dr. Otto Warburg, who discovered that cancer cells
have a fundamentally different energy metabolism compared to
healthy cells, and that malignant tumors tend to feed on sugar.
More recently, researchers discovered that while cancer cells
feed on both glucose and fructose, pancreatic tumor cells use
fructose specifically to divide and proliferate.

    Dr. Seyfried’s work confirms that sugar is the primary fuel
for cancer, and that by restricting sugar and providing an
alternate fuel, namely fat, you can dramatically reduce the
rate of growth of cancer.

He explains:
        When we’re dealing with glucose and [cancer] management,
we know from a large number of studies that if respiration of
the tumor is neffective, in order to survive, the cells must use
an alternative source of energy, which is fermentation. We know
that glucose is the primary fuel for fermentation. Fermentation
becomes a primary energy-generating process in the tumor cell.
By targeting the fuel for that process, we then have the
capability of potentially managing the disease.

    The strategy Dr. Seyfried suggests is a low-carb, low to
moderate protein, high-fat diet, which will effectively lower
your blood sugar. This is an easily measurable parameter that
you can check using a diabetic blood glucose meter. This type
of diet, called a ketogenic diet, will also elevate ketone
bodies, as fat is metabolized to ketones that your body can
burn in the absence of food. When combined with calorie
restriction, the end result will put your body in a metabolic
state that is inhospitable to cancer cells.

        Ketones is a fat breakdown product that can replace
glucose as a major fuel for many of the organs and especially
our brain, he says.

    Tumor cells, however, cannot use ketone bodies because of
their respiratory insufficiency. So the ketogenic diet represents
an elegant, non-toxic way to target and marginalize tumor cells.
It also allows you to dramatically lower your glucose levels,
as the ketones will protect your body against any hypoglycemia
that might otherwise be induced by carb restriction.

        All of the newer cells in your body will be transitioned
to these effective ketones, thereby preventing them from damage
from hypoglycemia. At the same time, the tumor cells are now
marginalized and under tremendous metabolic stress. It’s a whole
body therapy you need to bring the whole body into this metabolic
state, he explains.

        We like to call it a new state of metabolic homeostasis:
a state where ketones have reached the steady state level in
your blood and glucose has reached a steady lower level in your
blood...If it’s done right and implemented right, it has powerful
therapeutic benefits on the majority of people who suffer from
various kinds of cancers. Because all cancers have primarily
the same metabolic defect.

For Cancer Protection, Reverse Your Glucose to Ketone Ratios

    Dr. Seyfrieduses ketones and glucose as the measures of
this new metabolic state. The parameters associated with an
ideal state are ketone levels equal to or higher than the
glucose level in your blood.

        There’s a high ratio of glucose to ketones. But in a
fasted or therapeutic state, this ratio is actually reversed.
Ketones can actually become higher than glucose, he says. What
they can do is they can get their blood sugars down to 2.5 to
3 millimolar [equivalent to about 55-65 mg/dl], and then their
ketones to up to 3 or 4 millimolar, where the ratio is now
reversed. It’s this state that now brings the body into this
new physiology.

    You can easily check your glucose levels at home, you’d
need to work with a doctor to measure ketone levels in your
blood. Generally speaking, a fasting glucose under 100 mg/dl
suggests that you're not insulin resistant, while a level
between 100-125 suggests you're either mildly insulin resistant
or pre-diabetic. Here, Dr. Seyfried recommends getting your
glucose down to a steady level of about 55-65 mg/dl, which is
about HALF of what’s conventionally considered good or normal.

    Blood ketones can be easily measured using the Medisense
Precision Xtra blood glucose and ketone monitor from Abbot
Laboratory. As many pharmacies might not stock the meter (bar
code #, 93815 80347), it might be necessary to call Abbott directly
(1-800-527 3339) to obtain the meter. According to Dr. Seyfried,
the Precision Xtra seems the most accurate of all the ones
he’s used.

    It is important to mention, however, that the blood ketone
strips are more expensive than the blood glucose strips. Dr.
Seyfried therefore recommends measuring your blood ketones every
few days rather than 3x/day for blood glucose. Although urine
ketone measurement is a cheap way to assess ketones, urine ketone
levels are not always indicative of blood ketone levels. It is
best if you can measure ketones from both blood and urine.

        I work with nutritionists and physicians, Dr. Seyfried
says. The problem with cancer patients is that many of the
practitioners are unfamiliar with this whole approach, so there’s
this tremendous gap.

We have knowledge of how to do this. We have patients willing
to do it. But we lack professionals that are trained or even
understand the concepts of how to implement these kinds of
approaches.

    All of the guidelines are included in Dr. Seyfried’s book,
Cancer as Metabolic Disease, which is available on Amazon. He’s
also published a couple of papers 1,2 that outline the
guidelines and treatment strategies for cancer patients. One
caveat to consider is your use of medications, as you need to
know what the adverse effects might be if you use a medication
at a particular dosage along with this kind of metabolic therapy.         

Thank You  Dr. Mercola

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

The Benefits of a Ketogenic Diet and Its Role in Cancer Treatment

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that Ihave posted since 
I started this blog. There is TONS OFINFORMATION there for you to 
learn from. It's the typeof information that not only saved my life...
It also has given me a better quality of life.

                                   SPONSORS

 

                    End  Sinus Pain and recurring Infections

                                http://bit.ly/19WEe7v

   The Most Urgent Herpes Discovery That Stops Outbreaks Naturally
                                  http://bit.ly/19Wwqmb

                   The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                                   http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

By Dr. Mercola

    Could a ketogenic diet eventually be a standard of care drug-free treatment
for cancer? Personally, I believeit’s absolutely crucial, for whatever type of
cancer you’retrying to address, and hopefully some day it will be adoptedas a
first line of treatment.

    A ketogenic diet calls for eliminating all but non-starchy vegetable
carbohydrates,  and replacing them with healthy fats and high-quality protein.

    The premise is that since cancer cells need glucoseto thrive, and carbohydrates
turn into glucose in your body,then lowering the glucose level in your blood
though carband protein restrictionliterally starves the cancer cells into oblivion.
Additionally,low protein intake tends to minimize the mTOR pathway that
accelerates cell proliferation.

    This type of diet, in which you restrict all but non-starchy vegetable carbs and
replace them with low to moderate amounts of high-quality protein and high
amounts of beneficial fat, is what I recommend for everyone, whether you have
cancer or not. It’s a diet that will help optimize your weight and all chronic
degenerative disease. Eating this way will help you convert from carb burning mode
to fat burning.

    Dr. Thomas Seyfried is one of the leading pioneer academic researchers in
promoting how to treat cancer nutritionally.He’s been teaching neurogenetics and
neurochemistry as itrelates to cancer treatment at Yale University and Boston
College for the past 25 years.

    He’s written over 150 peer-reviewed scientific articles and book chapters, and
has also  published a book, Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin,
Management, and Prevention of Cancer.

Ketogenic Diet Accepted as First Line Approach for Epilepsy;
Is Cancer Next?

    The ketogenic diet has actually been used for managing seizures in children
for quite some time. While Dr. Seyfried and his team worked on brain cancer and
epilepsy in mice, one of his students suggested investigating whether or not a
ketogenic diet might also be effective against tumors.

    So, in the late ‘90s, they began dovetailing their work on ketogenic diets
and epilepsy and cancer together, eventually bringing them to a better
understanding of how changing your whole-body metabolic state can be
effective in targeting and eliminating tumor cells.

    Interestingly, clinical medicine has recognized the ketogenic diet as a
valuable option in the treatment of epilepsy since the late 90’s.

        I served as the organizer for the Ketogenic Diet Special Interest Group
at the American Epilepsy Society, Dr. Seyfried says.

        We initially started as a small focus group with the folks from Johns
Hopkins Medical School, where the diet has had its greatest use and impact.
And then we started to grow andsubstantially increase interest mainly through
the efforts of Jim Abrahams.

        Jim started the Charlie Foundation for his son Charlie, who went through
a near-death experience from seizures and was rescued using ketogenic diets.
His colleague, Meryl Streep, the famous movie actress, became very involved
in this.

        Now the ketogenic diet is receiving considerable attention in the 
epilepsy community as a first line of approach.

Although this is still not widely accepted, I have to admit that the ketogenic
diet is now recognized as an important component for the management of
refractory seizures in children.

    According to Dr. Seyfried, the mechanism by which the ketogenic diet manages
seizures is not nearly as clear as the way the ketogenic diet manages cancer. This
is ironic considering that it’sbarely known, let alone applied, within oncology
circles, while it’s already a first line of treatment for epilepsy. In the case of cancer,
it’s well-established that it’s the glucose reduction that kills the cancer cells.

            Continued 3/5/14

Thank You  Dr. Mercola

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

 

Almost 100% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients go with orthodox medicine first,

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.


                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

                

           Continued from 2/26/14



If we put all of this together we come to the following facts:

    Almost 100% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients go with orthodox
medicine first,

    About 97% of these patients die, or are sent home to die and later
die, due to their cancer and/or their cancer treatment,

    Only a very small percentage of the cancer patients sent home to
die ever go with alternative cancer treatments, they simply go home
and die,

    Of those who do go with alternative cancer treatments, only a
very small percentage of them ever pick a treatment strong enough to
give them a 50% chance of survival.

Is it any wonder that deaths from cancer continue to rise in spite
of the power of some of the alternative cancer treatments?

So, what is the cure rate of recently diagnosed cancer patients who
go with alternative medicine exclusively? It depends on how dangerous
their cancer is and what treatment they pick. There are more than 400
alternative cancer treatments.

If they pick the best possible treatment for their situation, when
they are first diagnosed, a 90% or higher true cure rate is fairly
easy to achieve. Overall, there are at least two dozen alternative
cancer treatments that can come close to a 90% overall true cure
rate across the board for those who use alternative cancer treatments
exclusively and pick a potent treatment right from the beginning.

The amazing thing is that orthodox medicine has had its own
opportunities to have its own 90% cure rate. There are two incredible
substances that allow chemotherapy to safely target cancer cells:
insulin and DMSO.

Insulin allows small amounts of chemotherapy to target cancer cells
because of the way it works with the cell membranes. The treatment is
called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT). Very, very few medical
doctors use this highly effective orthodox protocol.

DMSO actually binds to small amounts of certain chemotherapy drugs.
The DMSO, which has a very high affinity for cancer cells, then pulls
the chemotherapy into the cancer cells with it. On this website, this
treatment is called DMSO Potentiation Therapy (DPT).

DPT and IPT are two treatments that are easy to combine. It is a
very potent treatment. But don’t ask your oncologist about it, he or
she has probably never heard of it.

Because these two treatments use very low doses of chemotherapy (about
1/10th a normal dose), and because the chemotherapy targets the cancer
cells, these two treatments are very potent and have virtually no side-
effects.

But orthodox medicine does not use their own discoveries! They would
rather have a 3% cure rate than a 90% cure rate!! See this article
about DMSO and chemotherapy:

So, if this is true, and it is true, why haven’t you heard this on
television a hundred times during your lifetime? Why don’t movie
stars, investigative journalists, etc. constantly tout the vast
superiority of alternative cancer treatments?

Why You Haven’t Heard These Things Before

Treating cancer is more about information than it is about anything
else. People who know the best of the best alternative cancer
treatments have the information they need to have no fear of cancer.

But everything you have heard throughout your life is not based on
who has the most truth, it is based on who has the most money. If
you haven’t figured that out by now, you better figure it out real
quick.

The average American knows absolutely nothing about alternative
cancer treatments except rumors about people who probably used the
wrong treatment. Let us consider the reasons for this lack of accurate
and useful information about alternative cancer treatments with the
following list of facts:

Fact #1) Virtually every American gets the vast majority of their
information directly or indirectly from the media, which includes
television, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc. Only the Internet,
books and emails would not be considered part of the media (so far
anyway).

Fact #2) The pharmaceutical industry spends billions of dollars a
year advertising in the media.

Fact #3) In the 1940s, the book: The Drug Story was published by
newspaper owner Morris Bealle. This book exposed the vast corruption
in the media due to advertising dollars. In other words, it exposed
why newspapers (this was before television) refused to tell the
truth about corruption in corporations due to their fear of losing
advertising dollars to these same corrupt corporations.

However, it was well known long before the 1940s that advertising
money bought influence with the media. Actually, this was known no
later than the 1880s. In other words, for more than 100 years the
media has clearly understood that if you say things in the media
that are true, but cut into the profits of your advertisers, you
will quickly lose not only your advertising revenue from that company,
but possibly from many other companies as well (who also fear any
type of honesty).

Consider this quote by a famous journalist to a group of other
journalists, given in the 1880s:

    There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history
[1880], in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know
it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions,
and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in
print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the
paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries
for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to
write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another
job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my
paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.
The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie
outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and
to sell his country and his [human] race for his daily bread. You
know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent
press?We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes.
We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our
talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of
other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.

John Swinton (1829-1901) pre-eminent New York journalist & head of
the editorial staff at the New York Tribune. Quoted one night between
1880-1883. Quoted by Upton Sinclair in his 1919 book:

The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism, page 400 Even though
Upton Sinclair was famous by 1919, because he was criticizing
corruption in the media, he had to self-publish this book.

Absolutely nothing has changed since the 1880s.

Fact #4) As a result of the above item, and the billions spent every
year by the pharmaceutical industry in the media, American journalists
are required to publicly be highly, highly loyal to the pharmaceutical
industry. A single verbal slip by a journalist on or off the air could
cost him or her their job. Prior approval by the advertisers is
required to say anything mildly negative about the pharmaceutical
industry.

These same rules apply to most major industries, not just the
pharmaceutical industry.

Fact #5) The orthodox cancer treatments (e.g. surgery, chemotherapy,
radiation and many others) used in modern medicine are equally
subservient to the pharmaceutical industry. Actually, modern medicine
was corrupt long before the pharmaceutical industry took over the
medical schools many decades ago. Medical doctors, who are under the
control of the American Medical Association, are not allowed to use
any natural substance in the treatment of cancer. Modern doctors are
taught nothing but medicine using prescription drugs.

Medical doctors are only allowed to use natural substances in the
treatment of the symptoms of prescription drugs. This is called
complementary alternative medicine or CAM. CAM is not designed to
treat any disease!

Because of the money of the pharmaceutical industry: the medical
community, the media and the politicians are all subservient to the
pharmaceutical industry. All are in the same bed together.

There are many books that have been written on these subjects.

Fact #6) While vitamin companies can advertise in the media, the
substances which are used in the most potent natural or alternative
cancer treatments are never advertised in the media. Thus, the media
receives $0 dollars of advertising related to viable alternative
cancer treatments.

Thus, there is a multi-billion dollar difference between what the
pharmaceutical industry spends on advertising and what is spent
for the main substances used in alternative cancer treatments. There
is an equally proportional difference in the opinions you gather from
watching or reading the media.

Fact #7) Taking all of the above items into account, is it any wonder
that the average American hears nothing good about alternative cancer
treatments anywhere in the media, but hears hundreds or thousands of
good things about orthodox medicine in the media every year (thousands
if you include pharmaceutical advertisements and televison shows which
glorify medical doctors).

You might not remember hearing anything good about orthodox medicine.
Every time you watch a role-playing show on television that glorifies
a doctor or hospital you are being indoctrinated. Every time you hear
a news program that implies you should go to your orthodox doctor for
some problem, you are being indoctrinated. Every time you hear a
pharmaceutical ad you are being indoctrinated.

But you never hear anything positive about alternative cancer treatments.

This is by design.

That is why surviving cancer is about information, not medicine.
The methods to cure well over 90% of all newly diagnosed cancer
patients has existed for decades. But the information about these
treatments is decades away and can only come from the grass-roots.

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Comparing Cancer Treatments

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

An Example of One of the Potent Alternative Cancer Treatments

There are very few minerals that can get inside of cancer cells.
Two of the minerals that can get inside of cancer cells are cesium
and potassium. Once cesium gets inside of cancer cells it starts to
pull potassium from the blood into the cancer cells (potassium
supplementation is required when on this treatment in order to
replenish the potassium in the blood that was pulled into the
cancer cells). When there is enough build-up of cesium and/or
potassium inside the cancer cell, glucose is blocked from getting
into the cancer cell.

Since glucose is what feeds the cancer cell, the cancer cell will
eventually die from starvation. Not only that, but cesium and/or
potassium will also block the cancer cells from making lactic
acid, meaning they block the cachexia cycle at the cancer cell.
Other items also help block or overcome the cachexia cycle in
different ways (e.g. hydrazine sulfate blocks the cachexia cycle
at the liver).

Dr. A. Keith Brewer, PhD, discovered in the 1980s how cesium can
treat cancer. Aside from treating the cancer, it can treat the pain
of cancer within 12 to 36 hours, depending on what is causing the
pain. The liquid ionic cesium chloride used today is much more
potent than the cesium carbonate of the 1980s. The complete protocol
includes several other items.

The Cesium Chloride Protocol is one of the dozen or so alternative
cancer treatments that is rated in the top group of alternative
cancer treatments.

Like most potent alternative cancer treatments, this treatment is
so potent at killing cancer cells it must be paced, meaning
dosages must be set so the body has time to safely remove the
debris caused by the dead cancer cells.

Did you notice that orthodox cancer treatments must be paced
because of all the healthy cells that they kill. But alternative
cancer treatments must be paced because of all the targeted cancer
cells they kill.

Because of the number of cancer cells killed by the cesium chloride/
DMSO treatment, the cancer patient needs the expert advice of a
vendor who knows how to safely use these products. Fortunately, such
experts exist and are linked to on this website.

In fact, all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments require
expert advice over the telephone or in a clinic setting. For example,
the ozone RHP and ozone liquid I.V. treatments require expert advice
or a clinic setting.

Also, these most potent treatments generally cannot be combined
with each other (but they can be combined with some other alternative
treatments). The doses for these products are designed to kill
cancer cells at a rate that the body can safely handle the debris.
To combine such treatments may create too high of a die-off rate.

You probably believe that the true cure rate of orthodox cancer
treatments is around 40% and growing. This belief is the result of a
wide variety of fancy statistical tricks (which will be discussed
later). The fact is that if you get cancer, and you use nothing but
orthodox cancer treatments, your chance of surviving your cancer
(and surviving your cancer treatment) is less than 3%. And most of
those who are in the roughy 3% are on chemotherapy for life.

On top of that, even the 3% who do survive have had their bodies
so severely damaged that they are vulnerable to future bouts with
cancer. The cancer comes back as they say.

Here is what really happens to the typical cancer patient:

Step 1) The patient goes to the doctor and is diagnosed with cancer,

Step 2) The cancer surgeon cuts out the parts of the body with high

concentrations of cancer cells,

Step 3) The oncologists give the patient chemotherapy and/or radiation,

Step 4) They send the patient home in remission,

Step 5) The cancer soon appears again (because they didn’t actually
cure the patient),

Step 6) Go back to step 1)

This cycle continues until the patient is sent home to die (of course,
they are sent home to die after one more round of chemotherapy and
radiation).

Soon the patient dies. This is the cycle for virtually all cancer
patients. The only difference between one patient and another is how
many times the cycle is repeated.

This is medicine? This is like using a toxic chemical to fight a
spreading house fire.

One hundred years from now the medical doctors of the day will look
at the medicine of today in total and absolute disgust. There is
absolute ly no excuse for what is going on today in medicine.

The reader might be interested in knowing what alternative cancer
treatment experts have to deal with when they start working with a
cancer patient. Even before an expert in alternative medicine starts
working with a patient, two key things have happened in almost all
cases:

First, ninety-five percent of cancer patients who go with alternative
cancer treatments have already been given up for dead by orthodox
medicine or the patient has quit the treatment because it was too
painful or wasn’t working.

In other words, the patient first went to orthodox medicine and their
body was destroyed by orthodox medicine. This was time lost to use
the alternative cancer treatment. Furthermore, the patient was
severely damaged by the treatment.

Second, because so few alternative cancer treatments can cure people
sent home to die by orthodox medicine, very few of the cancer patients
sent home to die initially choose a treatment strong enough to give
them a fighting chance.

In other words, very few of these cancer patients picked one of the
most potent alternative cancer treatments even after leaving orthodox
medicine. This is an information issue, but in dealing with cancer
the issue of information is critical.

This is why the people who know what they are doing at treating cancer
may be dealing with people who were treated by an inferior orthodox
cancer treatment and an inferior alternative cancer treatment for their
situation. This is a great deal of time lost and usually a large
amount of damage to the body.

The issue of starting their treatment with orthodox medicine and then
considering the time it takes the patient to find a really potent
treatment, are two things which put a cancer patient and cancer expert
at a huge disadvantage.

Alternative medicine has lost between 1 and 4 years to treat the
patient and build their immune system  because the patient was using
orthodox treatments and/or weak alternative cancer treatments. Is it
any wonder that even the experts only have about a 50% cure rate?

           Continued on 2/28/14

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.