Some Alternative Cancer Treatments Are Far Superior...

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i


Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.

Why Some Alternative Cancer Treatments Are Far Superior 
to Orthodox Cancer Treatments

All of your life you have probably been taught that natural
substances from Mother Nature cannot possibly be as effective
against cancer as the highly condensed, highly potent synthetic
molecules made by the drug companies. In other words, you have
been taught that chemotherapy drugs kill cancer cells far better
than anything Mother Nature can put together.

That is definitely not a true statement, but even if it were
true it would be an irrelevant issue!

The key issue is whether patented drugs or Mother Nature’s
minerals and nutrients target cancer cells better.

The fact of the matter is that chemotherapy does not target
cancer cells. In fact, chemotherapy kills far, far more healthy
cells than it does cancer cells.

What this means is that chemotherapy must be given in very, very
low doses, spread out over long periods of time, and the therapy
must include gaps between the treatments. This pacing of the
drugs is because too many healthy cells would be killed if too
much chemotherapy were given too fast.

The reason orthodox medicine treats cancer like a chronic
disease is because orthodox treatments, in high doses, would
kill the patient long before they would cure the cancer. This
failure of orthodox medicine to safely kill cancer cells (i.e.
safely target cancer cells) is why they talk about a 5 year cure
rate rather than a true cure rate. If they can keep the patient
alive for 5 years they consider the patient to be cured, even if
they die in the sixth year.

Mother Nature’s cancer treatments, called natural cancer
treatments, or more commonly alternative cancer treatments,
generally do absolutely no harm to healthy cells. This is because
the human body, which was made by Mother Nature, knows exactly
what to do with Mother Nature’s minerals and nutrients.

Virtually all natural treatments for cancer do not kill healthy
cells not a single one.

This is the key  because alternative cancer treatments do not
harm or kill healthy cells, the items from nature that can kill
cancer cells can be given in much higher doses than chemotherapy
without any gaps in treatment!!

Thus, even if the mutations of natural molecules, called drugs,
were more potent at killing cancer cells than the original
natural molecules, because of the superiority of natural
substances at targeting cancer cells or leaving healthy cells
healthy, alternative cancer treatments can be far more effective
than orthodox drugs at treating cancer!

Because Mother Nature does not necessarily condense the cancer-
killing nutrients found in foods, some of the most potent of the
alternative cancer treatments are liquid ionic minerals, certain
types of ozone treatments, and other natural treatments that
contain molecules that can be condensed, such as intravenous
vitamin C (but not the Pauling/Cameron doses, however).

Just how effective are the best treatments from Mother Nature?
Several alternative cancer treatments have achieved a consistent
50% true cure rate on cancer patients who had been given up on
by orthodox medicine and had been sent home to die!

Such results are possible because these key alternative cancer
treatments not only target cancer cells, they can be given in
a very condensed and potent form, they do not need a catalyst,
and they can be given safely in much higher doses than chemotherapy.
Ponder that very carefully!

Also ponder the true cure rate of these same treatments on
cancer patients who use these treatments exclusively, meaning
they had not lost many months of treatment time while being treated
with orthodox treatments!

However, do not assume all alternative cancer treatments are equally
effective!! Very few of the 400+ alternative cancer treatments can
come anywhere close to a 50% true cure rate on patients given up on
by orthodox medicine.

One of the big mistakes people who seek out alternative cancer
treatments make is to assume that if an alternative cancer treatment
will cure one patient, it will cure all cancer patients, no matter
what condition they are in. This is a dangerous assumption because
very, very few of the 400+ alternative cancer treatments are
condensed and potent enough to cure 50% of those sent home to die
by orthodox medicine. Very few.

It could be a fatal mistake to see a testimonial on the Internet
about someone who cured their cancer with alternative cancer
treatments and then to use that treatment based on that testimonial.
The reason it could be a fatal mistake is that the patient telling
his or her story may have been a newly diagnosed patient, or had a
much less aggressive type of cancer than you do!!

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Highly Effective Cancer Treatments Have Been Persecuted and/or Ignored.

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i

                

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.


There are many, many instances where highly effective cancer 
treatments have been persecuted and/or ignored.

There is, in fact, a pattern. A very clear pattern. The pattern
is that if natural substances are involved, such as vitamin C,
the study and evidence is persecuted and/or ignored. When natural

substances are involved it is called alternative medicine. It
should be called persecuted and/or ignored medicine.

There are more than 400 alternative cancer treatments that
use natural substances, such as Vitamin C. Every one of them
is more effective than the Pauling/Cameron protocol. Every
one of them is far more effective than chemotherapy and/or
radiation. Every one of them is ignored and many of them
have been persecuted.

But there is a clear reason why natural substances are ignored.
It has nothing to do with their effectiveness. The pharmaceutical
industry cannot patent and control, and thus cannot profit from,
natural substances. They can only charge their monopolistic
prices on synthetic molecules, many of which are nothing but
mutations of natural molecules.

What is Going On In The Cancer Industry?

The February 22, 2006 USA Today mentioned that by the year 2015,
20% of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) could be for health
spending.

Now let’s be logical. Suppose a cure for cancer was found; and
suppose a treatment to avoid 90% of all heart disease problems
was found; and suppose a cure for type 2 diabetes was found;
and suppose a cure for AIDS/HIV was found. (In fact, all of
these have been found.) Would health spending ever hit 20%
of GDP? Of course not. All of these are highly profitable
diseases for both the pharmaceutical industry and the medical
industry (and the politicians who claim to represent their
constituents).

All the money being rasied for treating AIDS patients in Africa
are benefiting no one but the pharmaceutical industry stockholders
because a cure for AIDS/HIV has been around since 1990.

So in essence, the article in U.S. Today was predicting that
no cures for the highly profitable diseases would be found by
the year 2015. That is a safe prediction!! Another safe prediction
would be to predict that every new treatment for the profitable
diseases will be more expensive and more profitable than existing
treatments!! Here is another safe prediction, the 20% figure
will be hit before 2015.

Here is yet another safe prediction: the media will continue
to suppress alternative treatments for cancer, heart disease,
dementia, diabetes, etc. See this web site, you will be amazed
at what alternative medicine can already prevent and cure (and
this website is just the tip of the iceberg):  Dementia, Heart
Disease, Diabetes, etc. Website

Ask yourself this questions: When was the last time orthodox
medicine used their massive profits to find a cure for any
disease? When was the last time a cure for disease was found
that used prescription drugs?

If you said polio, you would be wrong. Polio was cured by a
medical doctor in the 1940s, but the cure was suppressed
because he used a form of Vitamin C, which drug companies
could not patent and control.

Polio was also cured by a nurse in Australia who used massage
therapy the right way. Polio was also cured by using ultraviolet
light. All these cures were ignored prior to the development of
the polio vaccine.

Have you ever wondered what would happen if someone found
a cure for cancer? You probably think that the person finding
the cure would be featured on every television show in America
and would win a Nobel Prize in medicine. Kaali and Lyman,
mentioned above, found a cure for AIDS / HIV, and more than
200 other diseases, and they didn’t win a Nobel Prize. Have you
ever heard of them before?

It is difficult, if not impossible, to convince the average
American that orthodox medicine today is not only corrupt, it
is more corrupt than it has ever been in the history of medicine.
That is saying a lot because orthodox medicine was persecuting
cures for disease in the 1700s.

Unfortunately, there are some in alternative medicine who are
also more interested in profits than their patients. The main
difference between orthodox medicine and alternative medicine
is freedom. The people with integrity in alternative medicine
are allowed a great deal of freedom to help others. However,
the Food and Drug Administration is always looking for excuses
to crush the people who know how to cure diseases which are highly
profitable to Big Pharma and Big Medicine (and thus Big Government).

Nevertheless, in spite of some persecution, there are over 400
alternative cancer treatments that currently exist. Every one
of them can cure some cases of cancer, if the person starts using
that treatment immediately after being diagnosed. However, there
is a very wide range in effectiveness between these treatments,
especially when used on advanced cancer patients.

The problem with alternative medicine is that patients are
frequently on their own to find out which treatments work for
their situation and which don’t work. Unlike orthodox medicine,
which is very uniform across the country, alternative medicine
is neither organized, nor uniform. Nor do we have very much money.
The quest for truth is always a winding and rocky road, especially
when money is involved.

Some people erroneously think that medical doctors do not use
the best alternative cancer treatments because the doctors do
not know which treatments are really effective. While medical
schools turn doctors into nothing but drug salesmen, that is
not why medical doctors do not use natural substances in the
treatment of disease. Medical doctors know how to read. But
they also know that if they used a single one of these
alternative cancer treatments on a single cancer patient,
they would risk losing their license and/or could go to jail!!

While it is this attitude that creates uniformity in orthodox
medicine, it is also this attitude that crushes progress. Orthodox
medicine is a highly controlled monopoly, totally controlled by
the combination of Big Pharma and the American Medical Association.

The suppression of truth by Big Medicine is why this website,
and many other websites, exist. The major purpose of this website
is to make information about alternative cancer treatments free and
available to the public so that more and more people know which
alternative cancer treatments are the strongest.


Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments..."Integrity".

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i     

by R. Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

The Key Issue..."Integrity".

The issue of treating cancer has far more to do with integrity than
it does with science. In fact, after several years of researching
this very issue, it is clear to this author that treating cancer
today has absolutely nothing to do with science. Nothing at all.

Had scientists embraced the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s, and
refined it as future discoveries in natural medicine were made,
cancer would have been a footnote in the history books written
in the 1940s.

In the 1930s, Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, also discovered a
cure for cancer using an electromedicine frequency generator
which is commonly called a Rife Machine. He was shut down and his
technology was lost to the world for more than 70 years.

In fact, this website endorses a potent cancer treatment which is
primarily a combination of the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s and
the restoration of the Rife Machine of the 1930s. While this is
a potent treatment, it is not the most potent treatment this website
endorses.

The late Dr. Bob Beck, a PhD in physics, spent 40 years of his life
working in electromedicine. Dr. Beck took the information he learned
from the research of a Dr. Kalli and a Dr. Lyman and he developed a
cure for AIDS.

Here is a quote from Dr. Bob Beck about Kaali and Lyman:

    When I looked into Dr. Kaali’s work [Patent #5188738 describes
a cure for AIDS/HIV found at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine
in 1990], I decided to go ahead and fund it. We found that it worked
all of the time [at curing AIDS/HIV]. For two and a half years, we
gave full credit for this invention to Dr. Kaali, whose name is on
the patent. Then I discovered that there was a long history of this
technology. We followed a trail of these patents back 107 years! We
found a patent, #4665898, that cured all cancer, dated May 19,
1987. Why has this been suppressed? Why hasn’t your doctor told you
about an absolutely proven, established cure for cancer? The answer
is that doctors get $375,000 per patient for surgery, chemotherapy,
x-ray, hospital stays, doctors and anesthesiologists.

 This is the official statistic from the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Unfortunately, the medical patient cured is a customer lost.A lot
of people say, Aren’t you infringing on others’ patents? In the
beginning, I was nervous, but when I found this technology had been
discovered and rediscovered for 107 years, I changed my mind. Now I
am broadcasting it from the rooftops. Still, it is very touchy. It’s
rocking the pharmaceutical, surgical and diagnostic industries. But
I really feel that I have been called to do this. I have had people
come to my door with guns. I have been threatened and chased. But I
think God wants this information out. I feel it is my mission to give
people back to themselves, to deliver them from these vested interests,
these [medical] priesthoods that are taking everyone’s money. I am not
charging a nickel.

Bob Beck, PhD, Interviewed by Kenneth and Dee Burke

As another example, in 1976, two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling,
PhD, and an associate, Ewan Cameron, M.D., did a published scientific
study in Scotland that resulted in proving that Vitamin C, given by
I.V., of 10 grams a day, could extend the average length of time a
terminal cancer patient lives by ten times or more as compared to
orthodox cancer treatments.

Had the medical community had any integrity, they would have quickly
replicated his study, come to the same conclusion (if they did exactly
what he did), and would have quickly started giving every cancer patient,
terminal or otherwise, 10 grams of Vitamin C by I.V. every day.

But that is not what happened.

What really happened is that 3 studies were done at the Mayo Clinic,
all of which were directly a reaction to the Pauling/Cameron study.
However, these studies were not designed to replicate the Pauling/
Cameron research. Instead they were designed to AVOID replicating
the Pauling/Cameron protocol, AVOID their patient mix, and AVOID their
statistical methods. Obviously, if you don’t follow the same protocol,
you won’t get the same results. And they didn’t.

Here is what the American Cancer Society (ACS) says about this issue:

    The Pauling study has been criticized by the NCI [National Cancer
Institute, a division of the NIH or National Institutes of Health,
a U.S. government agency] for being poorly designed, and subsequent
studies done at the Mayo Clinic found that advanced cancer patients
given the same dosage of vitamin C did not survive any longer than
those not given the supplement. However, the Mayo Clinic trials have
also been criticized for not fully addressing all the issues related
to the effects of vitamin C, which still left questions about its
effectiveness in the treatment of cancer.

The ACS would have been insane to challenge the integrity of Linus
Pauling (one of his Nobel Prizes was the Nobel Peace Prize, the other
was in chemistry). So they quote the totally corrupt NIH (Note: 500 NIH
employees were recently caught taking bribes from the pharmaceutical
industry, which they called outside consulting fees) and state that
a world famous chemist, and two-time Nobel Prize winner, doesn’t know
how to design a scientific study!!

But they also admit that the Mayo clinic did not use the same protocol
as Pauling and Cameron. So if there are still left questions, why hasn’t
the ACS used their annual hundreds of millions of dollars of income, and
their political clout, to set the record straight and replicate the
study as originally done? It has been more 40 years since the original
study, yet no one in orthodox medicine, with their billions of dollars
in research money, not even the ACS or NIH, has replicated the Pauling/
Cameron study.

It appears that extending the life expectancy of terminal cancer patients
six-fold, using natural substances, is not important to orthodox medicine.

In fact, two other studies did replicate the Pauling/Cameron study
far more closely than did the Mayo Clinic. Both of these studies
verified the Pauling/Cameron results. For more information, see:

Article from eBook: Case Study of Scientific Corruption

Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.


 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

Owning a Dog Is Linked to Reduced Heart Risk

REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i               

By Dr. Mercola

    More than 36 percent of Americans share their homes with a dog,
and 30 percent with a cat.1 This amounts to more than 70 million pet
dogs and 74 million pet cats in the US alone.

    This love affair with animals is nothing new; humans have been
sharing their lives with companion animals since ancient times, when
dogs, domesticated from wolves, may have been used for hunting and
protection, and cats, which were often regarded as sacred, helped
control pests.

    This mutually beneficial relationship continues today; although
most Americans no longer depend on dogs for hunting or cats to scavenge
mice, we take them in with abandon no less, and even look the other
way when they wake us up barking or meowing at 4 am, chew up our
slippers or scratch up our new furniture.

    Why?

    Because they provide unconditional love in return, providing a
sense of friendship and comfort in a way that is unmatched, sometimes
even by humans. And as if you needed another reason to give your pet
a hug today, research is also increasingly showing that these furry
creatures offer proven benefits to your health.

American Heart Association Says Owning a Pet Benefits Your Heart

    According to a new statement released by the American Heart
Association (AHA), owning a pet, particularly a dog, may reduce your
risk of heart disease. The conclusion came following a review of
dozens of studies that showed pet owners were in better health than
non-pet owners. Highlights of the research included:

        People with dogs engaged in more walking and more physical
activity, and were 54 percent more likely to get the recommended
level of physical activity Pet ownership is probably associated with
a reduction in heart disease risk factors and increased survival
among patients

        Owning a pet is linked with lower blood pressure and
cholesterol levels, and a lower incidence of obesity Pets can have
a positive effect on your body’s reaction to stress, including a
decrease in heart rate, blood pressure and adrenaline-like hormone
release when a pet is present

    While many of the studies did not prove that owning a pet
directly reduces heart disease risk, and some of the benefits may be
due to the increased activity that dog owners get from walking with
or playing with their pets, the researchers concluded:

        Pet ownership, particularly dog ownership, is probably
associated with decreased CVD [cardiovascular disease] risk  [and]
may have some causal role in reducing CVD risk.

Pets Benefit Your Health at All Life Stages

    Pets have a way of appealing to very diverse groups, from children
to the elderly, families to singles. Perhaps this is because they
offer advantages for people at all stages of life:

        Children: Owning a pet has been linked to higher levels of
self-esteem as well as an ability to function better emotionally in
kids. Children who live with a dog during their first year of life
also have a lower risk of respiratory tract infections and ear
infections, and need fewer antibiotics, than children in non-pet
homes.

        This may be because dogs track more dirt and bacteria into
homes, and this increased exposure to “germs” helps strengthen the
immune system. Living with a cat was also linked to health benefits
among children.

        Adults: One of the most revealing studies on the health
benefits of pets for adults involved New York City stockbrokers who
were being treated with medications for high blood pressure. Those
who adopted a dog or cat were able to lower their blood pressure
significantly more, and felt calmer, than those who did not.

        Couples: Couples who own pets are less stressed by conflicts
and recover quicker when conflicts occur. Pet-owning couples also
reported more signs of happiness and sociability than non pet-owning
couples.

        Singles: Singles, as well as those who are widowed, divorced
or separated, are increasingly adopting pets because they provide
love and a sense of family.

        Elderly: Two of the biggest hurdles facing the elderly
are social isolation and inactivity. Owning a dog not only increased
the amount of activity, with dog owners taking twice as many daily
walks than non-owners, but also increased social interactions through
casual conversations that occurred during the daily walks. Elderly
dog owners also report being more satisfied with their social,
physical and
emotional states.

Do Cats or Other Pets Give Similar Benefits?

    Many of the health benefits of pets focus on dogs, with their
tendency to make us get out for more frequent walks as well as their
strong sense of emotional devotion to their humans. But cats, too,
offer benefits to your health. For starters, many of the above-mentioned
studies involved both dogs and cats; for instance, living with either a
dog or a cat is linked to lower rates of respiratory infections in kids,
and both dogs and cats helped lower blood pressure among stressed-
out stockbrokers.

    Cat owners, specifically, have even been found to have a 40 percent
lower risk of heart attacks than non-owners,10 and a cat’s purr, which
gives off low-frequency vibrations, has been called a “natural healing
mechanism” that may help strengthen and repair bones, relieve pain and
heal wounds.

    Studies involving birds, reptiles, horses and other pets are far
less common than those with cats or dogs. However it’s often the
emotional connection that leads to the decreased stress responses felt
by those when their beloved pet is present. So it stands to reason
that any pet with which you feel an emotional bond, whether furry,
feathered or finned, can benefit your health on multiple levels.

Health Considerations Shouldn’t Be Your Only Motivation for Getting
a Pet

    Pet owners do seem to have a health advantage over non-owners,
but you shouldn’t rush out to adopt a pet solely for this reason.
Obviously, having a pet comes with considerable demands on your time
and finances, so you must be sure you are fully able to care for a pet,
and committed to adding this animal to your family for its lifetime,
before proceeding. Even the AHA researchers noted:

Despite the likely positive link, people shouldn’t get a pet solely 
to reduce heart disease risk.

    However, if you are thinking about adding a pet to your family,
or if you’re a pet owner already, you can find a guide for bringing
home a new dog or cat, along with a treasure trove of additional
pet ownership information, at Mercola Healthy Pets.

    Every day at Mercola Healthy Pets, Dr. Karen Becker shares her
passion for the benefits of proactive, integrative and wellness-
oriented pet healthcare, and the value of alternative therapies that
are rarely, if ever, discussed in the conventional veterinary community.
Now countless animal lovers across the globe are learning about the
foundations of pet health and becoming empowered to take the best
possible care of their pets, and I urge you to join them if you’re
a pet owner, too.

Thank You Dr. Mercola

 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.

What 9 out of 10 DOCTORS Would Prescribe...

  UPDATE:  The only thing to fear is fear itself and what 9 out of
10 doctors would prescribe.

HOW TRUE THIS STATEMENT IS...Not only with cancer treatment...
but 90+% of what is being prescribed for all of our medical
problems.

Have YOU ever wondered why you settle for treating the symptoms
in stead of curing the medical problem.

Could it be that we have been lied to all of these years by
????????? Brain washed for the all mighty DOLLAR??? If you
really want to know the answer to that question...KEEP READING
 THIS BLOG...OPEN your mind and start thinking for YOUR health.


REMINDER: In The Archive is all of the articles that I
have posted since I started this blog. There is TONS OF
INFORMATION there for you to learn from. It's the type
of information that not only saved my life...It also has
given me a better quality of life.

                             SPONSORS

              The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
                


        World's #1 Publisher of Information About Alternative
        Cancer Treatments Cancer Defeated
                  http://bit.ly/ZVR6Qw

The Explanation...

What has just been described is how modern medicine treats cancer
that has already metastasized. Cancer can be compared to a fire.
It is a fire that will spread until it kills you. But modern medicine
does nothing that will put out the fire.

The first fire truck represents surgery to cut out tumors or parts
of the body where there are concentrations of cancer cells, after
the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body!

The third fire truck represents radiation, which is used to shrink
tumors, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout
the body!

While the second fire truck represents chemotherapy, the progress
chemotherapy is making is frequently judged by its ability to
shrink tumors. Oncologists love to tell the cancer patient that
their tumors are shrinking.

But even if chemotherapy does slow down the progress of the cancer,
and even if it puts cancer patients into remission, it is almost always
a temporary Pyrrhic victory because the cancer almost always
returns.

The Food and Drug Administration (the real FDA) has approved
scoresof chemotherapy drugs, but none of them can stop the spread
of cancer because chemotherapy drugs do not target cancer cells.

There are scores of natural substances that do target cancer cells
and can stop the spread of cancer. But the FDA has never approved a
single one of these natural substances (natural substances cannot be
patented by the pharmaceutical companies).

Insurance companies will not pay for natural cancer treatments (i.e.
alternative cancer treatments). The media never says anything good
about alternative cancer treatments, but constantly glorifies the
medical profession in television show after television show. Medical
schools have not taught a single truthful thing about alternative
cancer treatments since 1910.

The Importance of the Spreading of Cancer

To understand how all of this relates to the spreading of cancer,
consider this quote by an M.D., the late Dr. Philip Binzel:

    When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the
doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about
the tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or
chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, How is the tumor
doing? No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical
training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation
and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but
the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would
hear, Isn’t that marvelous! The tumor is gone! Yes, it was, but so
was the patient. How many millions of times are we going to have
to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are treating the
wrong thing? In primary cancer, with only a few exceptions, the
tumoris neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. I am going
torepeat that statement. In primary cancer, with few exceptions, the
tumor is neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. What is
health-endangering and life-threatening is the spread of that disease
through the rest of the body.There is nothing in surgery that will
prevent the spread of cancer. There is nothing in radiation that will
prevent the spread of the disease.

There is nothing in chemotherapy that will prevent the
spread of the disease. How do we know? Just look at the statistics!
There is a statistic known as survival time. Survival time is defined
as that interval of time between when the diagnosis of cancer is
first made in a given patient and when that patient dies from his
disease.In the past fifty years, tremendous progress has been made
in the early diagnosis of cancer. In that period of time, tremendous
progress had been made in the surgical ability to remove tumors.
Tremendous progress has been made in the use of radiation and
chemotherapy in their ability to shrink or destroy tumors. But,
the survival time of the cancer patient today is no greater than it
was fifty years ago. What does this mean? It obviously means that
we are treating the wrong thing!

                Philip Binzel, M.D., Alive and Well

In other words, if the cancer has not spread from the tumor, the
tumor presents no danger to the patient (with rare exceptions, such
as when a tumor blocks the fluid in the common bile duct).

It is important to understand that the vast majority of cells in a
tumor are healthy cells. Cancer cells CANNOT form tissue. Thus,
if the cancer were contained within the tumor, there would not be
enoughcancer cells in the person’s body to endanger their life.
Likewise,if a man had prostate cancer, and the cancer was contained
insidethe prostate gland, there could not be enough cancer cells inside
the prostate gland to endanger the patient’s life.

Even if the cancer cells in a tumor were killed, or the tumor was
cut out, it would not solve the problem of the spreading of the
cancer if the cancer has already spread. There would be no benefit
to the patient because it is the spreading of the cancer that kills
cancer patients, not the cancer inside the tumor.

Yet the focus of orthodox medicine is on shrinking the tumors.

Chemotherapy (i.e. the second fire truck in the example) is so toxic
to cancer patients that if they gave enough of it to a cancer patient
to kill all of the cancer cells, the patient would die from the side-
effects of the chemotherapy immediately.

So doctors give chemotherapy in very low doses (though they seem like
very high doses), not enough to actually cure you. In the mean time
the cancer continues to spread.

Chemotherapy may put a patient in remission, but virtually every
cancer patient who goes into remission eventually comes out of
remission and later dies.

Incredibly, doctors use radiation, the third fire truck, even after
the cancer has started to spread. They are interested in shrinking a
tumor. As mentioned above, the tumor is not the problem, it is the
spreading of the cancer that is the problem.

About Alternative Cancer Treatments

Alternative medicine vendors, practitioners and consultants fall
into one of three categories.

First, there are experts in alternative cancer treatments who care
about the cancer patients they work with. These people may or may
not make their living working with cancer patients. Some of them
make a lot of money treating cancer successfully and others make
virtually nothing. But the common thread is that they care about
the cancer patients and do a very good job working with them!! 

Second, there are vendors who mean well, and would like to help
cancer patients, but simply don’t know how to help them. They may
be selling one product line and simply don’t know anything outside
of that product line.

Third, are the con artists who couldn’t care less about any patient
because they are only in it for the money.

Fortunately, the first category has quite a few people in it!!

Mother Nature obviously fits in the first category!! It is just a
matter of finding the best of the best products from Mother Nature
and those people who know how to use those products!!


Copyright (c) 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved.


 God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Have a great day...unless you have made other plans.