SPONSORS
The Solution For Disease FREE Health...
http://bit.ly/RGNZ0iNew - Reverse Your Diabetes Today
http://tinyurl.com/n8bygevI just found the coolest way to make money from your computer!
Check it out.
http://bit.ly/1ga9NeRThe Foundation of the War in Medicine
To understand what is going on in medicine we must look to the past. Consider
this article from the North Carolina Museum of History on medicine in the
19th century and before:
"Just as common as taking medicine for a fever, from the Middle Ages
through the mid-1800s, bloodletting was performed on patients to cure
disease.
Bloodletting is the process of withdrawing blood as a treatment. Most
people thought they would die anyway and used bloodletting as a last resort.
It began when Greek physician Hippocrates claimed that all diseases occur
when there is an imbalance of the four body fluids, otherwise known as
humors–black bile, blood, phlegm, and yellow bile. His discovery led to
bloodletting. When the blood was drawn from the vein it was believed that the
disease would flow out with the blood ...
The procedure of bloodletting is done by applying either a leech or
scarificator that will make the initial puncture. Then, a heated cup is
placed over the wound that will take the additional blood. The process is
repeated until all the needed blood is taken. It was also common for the
doctors to use pointed sticks, knives, or tiny bows and arrows to draw blood.
These tools were often difficult to use and could result in too much blood
withdrawn from the patient and occasionally causing death.
A famous victim of bloodletting is George Washington. He died from
being bled heavily as a treatment for laryngitis.
Toward the end of the time period in which bloodletting was common,
leeches began to be used. They were considered less painful and withdrew a
reliable amount of blood. The peak use of leeches was in the 1830s. Due to
the theory of Francois Broussais many doctors used leeching for symptoms such
as laryngitis, mental illness, and obesity. Medicinal leeches were preferred
over American leeches, which were said to make too small incisions and to
draw less blood than the European species. The use of leeching became so
popular that medicinal leeches became an endangered species."
Now suppose that in the 1830s, which was the peak of the use of leeches, the
medical community at the time, plus the leech breeders and scarification
makers got together and decided they had a good thing going. Suppose they
said that if they abandoned their techniques for newer techniques that their
incomes would drop and many jobs would be lost. Those who grew leeches
would make less profits, those who made the scarificators and other instruments
would make less profits, the doctors would make less income, and so on.
Suppose they all conspired together to suppress all future medical
discoveries (made after 1830) in order to maximize their earnings and
profits.
Had that happened, we would still be using bloodletting, leeches and
scarificators for virtually all diseases. Scientists today would be spending
vast amounts of money studying the DNA of the leeches to breed the most
efficient leeches. Scientists would be studying the optimum number of leeches
to use, and the optimum places on the body to place them for each type of
disease. Scientists would be studying the optimum amount of blood to draw.
The instrument makers would be designing high precision instruments to make
incisions and suctions, and so on and so forth.
The massive dollars they would request from the general public on "research"
would yield a very small, but ever-growing amount of progress. A "cure" would
always be "just around the corner," but since their interest was in profits
and income, not the health, comfort and survival of their patients, the "cure"
would never come. They might also figure out ways to cover up the lack
of progress in medicine by using creative statistics. They might develop very
clever ways to define "cure rates" in order to hide the fact that there was
very little progress being made.
What Has Happened???
Well, this "what-if" scenario for the 1830s is exactly what happened in
modern medicine in the 1920s. Only instead of stopping progress with
bloodletting and leeches, the medical profession decided to stop all medical
progress at the stage of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments. The
original reason for stopping progress was profits. The pharmaceutical
industry, the chemical industry and the petroleum industry (many prescription
drugs are made from petroleum products and these three industries had cross-
ownership) were afraid that new discoveries might lessen their profits. Using
the profits of these industries as bait and influence money, the new
mentality spread to the leadership of the medical industry, and from there to
many other places.
The stagnation of progress in treating cancer continues today because the
enormously profitable procedures of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation make
many, many billions of dollars every year for the pharmaceutical industry,
the chemical industry, the petroleum industry, medical doctors, hospitals,
medical equipment makers, T.V. stations (through the advertising of the
pharmaceutical companies), radio stations (ditto), major magazines (ditto),
the ACS (the American Cancer Society is basically a public relations vehicle
for orthodox medicine), etc. etc.
"Chemotherapy is an incredibly lucrative business for doctors, hospitals,
and pharmaceutical companies…..The medical establishment wants everyone to
follow the same exact protocol. They don’t want to see the chemotherapy
industry go under, and that’s the number one obstacle to any progress in
oncology."
Dr Warner, M.D.
In other words, the medical community has gone along with the idea that
chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are so profitable, that there will never
be any progress in the "war against cancer." The leaders have intentionally,
willingly, knowingly and pro-actively suppressed every possible advance in
cancer treatments for over 80 years, dating back to the 1920s. (Note:
Salvarsan, the first chemotherapy drug, was discovered by Nobel Prize winner
Paul Ehrlich in 1909 and was initially used primarily on syphilis.)
The Ralph Moss Story, by Ralph Moss
"In 1974, I began working at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, the
world's leading cancer treatment hospital. I was an idealistic and eager
young science writer, sincerely proud to be part of Sloan Kettering and
Nixon's "War On Cancer." Ever since I was a kid, my main heroes were
scientists (with the Brooklyn Dodgers running a close second!) The job at
Sloan-Kettering seemed like a dream come true for me. I wanted to be part of
the winning team that finally beat cancer.
Within three years, I had risen to the position of Assistant Director of
Public Affairs at the Hospital. At the time, I was 34 years old, married to
my high-school sweetheart, and we had a daughter and son, then 9 and 7 years
old. We had dreams of buying a house and saving for the kids' education, so
you can imagine how thrilled we were when I was promoted, with a huge raise,
glowing feedback from my bosses, and was told that perks of the job would
eventually include reduced tuition for the kids at New York University.
Needless to say, we all were really counting on my "bright future" at Memorial
Sloan-Kettering. But something soon happened that changed the courseof my
life forever.
A big part of my job as Assistant Director of Public Affairs was to write
press releases for the media about cancer news and to write the in-hospital
newsletter. I also handled calls from the press and public about cancer
issues. So I was just doing a normal day's work - or so I thought-when I
began interviewing an esteemed scientist at the Hospital for a newsletter
article I was working on. It turned out that the scientist, Dr.Kanematsu
Sugiura, had repeatedly gotten positive results shrinking tumors in mice
studies with a natural substance called amygdalin (You may have heard of it
as "laetrile".) Excitedly (and naively!) I told my "discovery" of Sugiura's
work to the Public Affairs Director and other superiors, and laid out my
plans for an article about it. Then I got the shock of my life.
They insisted that I stop working on this story immediately and never
pick it up again. Why? They said that Dr. Sugiura's work was invalid and
totally meaningless. But I had seen the results with my own eyes! And I knew
Dr. Sugiura was a true scientist and an ethical person. Then my bosses gave
me the order that I'll never forget: They told me to lie. Instead of the
story I had been planning to write, they ordered me to write an article and
press releases for all the major news stations emphatically stating that all
amygdalin studies were negative and that the substance was worthless for
cancer treatment. I protested and tried to reason with them, but it fell on
deaf ears.
I will never forget how I felt on the subway ride home that day. My head
was spinning with a mixture of strong feelings- confusion, shock,
disappointment, fear for my own livelihood and my family's future, and behind
it all, an intense need to know why this cover-up was happening. After long
talks with my wife and parents (who were stunned, as you can imagine) I
decided to put off writing any amygdalin press releases as long as I could
while I discreetly looked into the whole thing some more on my own time.
Everyone at the office seemed happy just to drop the whole thing, and we got
busy with other less controversial projects.
So in the next few months, I was able to do my own investigating to
answer the big question I couldn't let go of: Who were these people I worked
for and why would they want to suppress positive results in cancer research?
My files grew thick as I uncovered more and more fascinating - and disturbing
- facts. I had never given any thought to the politics of cancer before. Now
I was putting together the pieces as I learned that:
The people on Sloan-Kettering's Board of Directors were a "Who's Who" of
investors in petrochemical and other polluting industries. In other words,
the hospital was being run by people who made their wealth by investing in
the worst cancer-causing things on the planet.
CEOs of top pharmaceutical companies that produced cancer drugs also
dominated the Board. They had an obvious vested interest in promoting
chemotherapy and undermining natural therapies.
The Chairman and the President of Bristol-Myers Squibb, the world's
leading producer of chemotherapy, held high positions on MSKCC's Board.
Of the nine members of the Hospital's powerful Institutional Policy
Committee, seven had ties to the pharmaceutical industry
The Hospital itself invested in the stock of these same drug companies.
Directors of the biggest tobacco companies in the U.S., Phillip Morris
and RJR Nabisco, held places of honor on the Board.
Six Board Directors also served on the Boards of The New York Times, CBS,
Warner Communications, Readers Digest, and other media giants.
Not surprisingly, profits from chemotherapy drugs were skyrocketing and
the media glowingly promoted every new drug as a "breakthrough" in cancer. I
kept all my notes in my filing cabinet at work. I had no idea what I would
ever do with them. I just knew that I had to get to the bottom of it, for
myself.
Meanwhile, the public's interest in laetrile refused to go away. A lot of
people were going across the border to Mexican clinics to get the stuff and
my secretary's phone was ringing off the hook with people wanting to know
what Sloan-Kettering thought of its value. I was once again told to give out
the news that the studies had all been negative.
At home, I called my family together for a meeting. With their support, I
decided I couldn't lie on behalf of the Hospital. In November of 1977, I
stood up at a press conference and blew the whistle on Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Center's suppression of positive results with amygdalin.
It felt like jumping off the highest diving board, but I had no doubt I was
doing the right thing. I was fired the next day for "failing to carry out his
most basic responsibilities" as the Hospital described it to the New York
Times. In other words, failing to lie to the American people.
When I tried to pick up my things in my office, I found my files had been
padlocked and two armed Hospital guards escorted me from the premises.
Luckily for all of us, I have a very smart wife who all along had been
making copies of my research notes and had put a complete extra set of files
in a safe place. Those notes turned into my first book, The Cancer Industry,
which is still in print (in an updated version) and available in bookstores.
That dramatic day, when I stood up in front of the packed press
conference and told the truth, was the beginning of a journey I never could
have predicted. I was launched on a mission that I'm still on today - helping
cancer patients find the truth about the best cancer treatments.
Well, we weren't able to buy a home until years later, the kids went to
colleges on scholarships and loans, and my wife took on a demanding full-time
job to help us get by. But in retrospect, my experiences as an insider in
"the cancer industry" were among the best things ever to happen to me. My
values were put to the test and I had to really examine what was important in
my life. It is because of this difficult experience at Sloan-Kettering that I
found a truly meaningful direction for my professional life, rather than just
climbing Sloan-Kettering's career ladder and losing my soul in the process."
Ralph Moss, author
The story of Ralph Moss, which is really the story of Dr. Kanematsu Sugiura,
is just the tip of the iceberg. Numerous alternative cancer researchers have
been rewarded for their discoveries with jail, being driven out of the
country, loss of license, harassment, and many other things. This war is not
for the weak at heart.
Thank You R. Webster Kehr
God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.
Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com
