Women: Think Twice About This Test, Even if Your Doctor Bullies You!

                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
                

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev

 I just found the coolest way to make money from your computer! Check it out.

http://bit.ly/1ga9NeR

By Johnnie Ham, MD, MBA

    Many women are completely unaware that the science backing the use of mammograms is sketchy at best. As was revealed in a 2011 meta-analysis by the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, mammography breast cancer screening led to 30 percent overdiagnosis and overtreatment, which equates to an absolute risk increase of 0.5 percent.

    There's also the risk of getting a false negative, meaning that a life-threatening cancer is missed.

    Unfortunately, even though some high-profile people agree that mammography has limitations as well as dangers, others prefer to ignore the science and continue to campaign for annual screenings without so much as a hint at the risks involved.

    Now, they’ve unrolled “new and improved” 3D TOMOSYNTHESIS mammogram, which still requiring mechanical compression, and delivers 30 percent more radiation!

    In order to make better informed decisions, I provide my patients with all of their screening options, their strengths and weaknesses, and I reinforce that they have a right to utilize those options. Some of the options may include; self and clinical breast exams, thermography, ultrasound and/or MRI. My role as a doctor is to diagnose and treat, but I am also an educator. I want my patients' focus to be on prevention to improve their health and well-being.

The Industry of Cancer

    Breast cancer has become big business, starting with the multi-billion dollar goliath, mammography. No other medical screening has been as aggressively promoted. My passion is providing integrative primary care as an MD for hundreds of patients. I also have over 23 combined years of military experience as an OB/GYN, trauma surgeon, experimental test pilot, and master army aviator.

    My training prepared me to navigate through challenging, and sometimes life threatening situations. Unfortunately, most women do not have the training I received, yet they could certainly use some of it to help navigate through the fear based methods of the breast cancer industry.

    The tide of thought on mammography’s benefits is rapidly changing as evidenced by recently published studies in the Archives of Internal Medicine, the Lancet Review, the British Medical Journal and the Nordic Cochrane Center; and the fact that the US Preventative Services Task Force and the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care.

Why are Nearly All Health Care Professionals Not Following Current Mammogram Recommendations?

    Nearly every woman age 40 and older continues to be told by their primary care physician, their gynecologist, the media, self-proclaimed advocacy groups, and even their medical insurance carrier, “get your annual mammogram!” despite the fact that nearly every recent authoritative study concludes that women should know all of the facts before agreeing to a mammogram screening. Yet nearly all health care professionals insist on mammograms. If a woman dare refuse, she may be chastised or worse, threatened. These efforts have gone beyond persuasion to guilt and even coercion, “I can’t be your doctor if you don’t get a mammogram.” Women need to stop this runaway train, not only for their sake, but for the sake of their daughters.

    In November 2012, the New England Journal of Medicine published a study by Dr Archie Bleyer, MD from The Oregon Health Sciences Center, and his co-author, Dr H. Gilbert Welch, M.D., M.P.H., from Dartmouth, challenging the validity of mammogram screenings and concluded that mammograms have little to no influence in the reduction of the number of women who ultimately die of breast cancer.

    Thirty years of US government data studied found that as many as 1/3 of cancers detected by mammography may not have been life threatening, and that over 1 million women have been over-diagnosed; leading to unnecessary treatments involving disfiguring surgeries; radiation and chemotherapy. They also showed that mammogram screenings have increased from about 30 percent of women 40 and older in 1985, to about 70 percent of women screened, proving how effective we have been at convincing women they need to get a mammogram.

    I have witnessed this strategy for decades and I have seen the profound psychological effect it has had on many of my patients. This paradigm has seriously misled women regarding the actual effectiveness, and the benefits vs. potential dangers of mammograms. They also have women confused about the erroneous belief that mammography is their only tool. Some women actually believe mammograms can prevent cancer, or do not realize they have the right to say, no!

    Most women comply with the current “gold standard” in fear of the ravages of breast cancer, convinced their annual mammogram will save their life through early detection. It is nearly impossible for them to negate decades of slick marketing, annual reminders from radiology imaging centers and the exploitation of October’s Breast Cancer Awareness month blitz. All of these efforts beautifully packaged, tied up with a pretty pink ribbon.

    I take my oath to do no harm very seriously. After many years of research, clinical practice; and due to my wife’s personal experience with mammography, I cannot in good conscience recommend mammograms. I inform my patients that mammograms are considered the current “gold standard”, but I also make certain they know the facts about the screening and that there are other screen tools available.

Facts and Persisting Concerns: Mammograms

    More women are refusing mammograms. This is reflected in the dramatic decline of 4.3 percent in 2010. Previously, mammography use had increased annually by 1 percent between 2005 and 2009.

Mammograms:

    Are incorrect 80 percent of the time (providing a false negative or
false positive)

    Require repeated ionized radiation that can cause cancer.

    Use compression, which can damage breast tissue or potentially spread cancer.

    Are not effective for up to 50 percent of women (women with dense breasts or implants)

    Can lead to over-diagnosis and over-treatment of non-invasive cancers

    Can lead to the disturbing practice of “preventative” double mastectomies

What is Mammography Industries Solution?

    The “new and improved” 3D TOMOSYNTHESIS mammogram, still requiring mechanical compression, and 30 percent more radiation! We know all levels of ionizing radiation can cause cancer but, astonishingly, radiologists still want you to have your traditional mammogram screening first, followed by tomosynthesis mammogram for those with dense breasts or an area of suspicion. When my local Radiology Community approached me in an effort to disprove my concerns, I posed one simple question: Can you show me, one well-designed study that proves screening mammography has improved ultimate survival rates? I am still waiting for their answer.

    We cannot prove that screening mammography improves the ultimate survival rate. A quick look at the SEER data would suggest treatment has improved, by a decline in the death rate since 1998 of 1.9 percent.8 For every 1,000 women in this country, today 125 will ultimately be diagnosed with breast cancer. Of those 125, over 40 will be over-diagnosed, and receive treatment they never needed, and suffer the potential psychological consequences of a cancer diagnosis. That leaves about 80, of which 28 will die of breast cancer. The decline since 1998 in the death rate means that for our 28 women who would have otherwise died from breast cancer, 2 more out of 1000 women diagnosed with breast cancer survived due to over a decade of treatment advances.

    But, we really don’t know what actually saved those 2 women, of the 125 diagnosed with breast cancer for every 1,000 women in our group. If we attribute anything to lifestyle changes we have emphasized recently (which has been shown repeatedly to work), then either we wipe out any improved survival rate from decades of treatment advances, or worse, we cause death to some of those 40 women who were over-diagnosed!

If You Have Dense Breasts it is Even Worse

    Breast density laws have now been passed in California,9 Connecticut, New York, Virginia and Texas making it mandatory for radiologists to inform their patients, who have dense breast tissue (40 to 50 percent of women) that mammograms are basically useless for them. Dense breast tissue and cancer both appear white on an X-ray, making it nearly impossible for a radiologist to detect cancer in these women. It’s like trying to find a snowflake in a blizzard. A law is now being considered at a Federal level as well.

    Some radiologists already provide density information to their patients, and encourage them to utilize other options like thermography, ultrasound and/or MRI. I believe it reasonable for a woman to trust that her radiologist is not withholding vital density information. Unfortunately, many have kept this potentially lifesaving data from women for decades, and our government agencies have failed to protect them from this unethical practice.

    I know it is extremely difficult to navigate through all of the contradicting information and study findings. It would better serve women if efforts, money and resources were utilized on educating women on cancer prevention, being that 95 percent of disease is lifestyle related. Yet 40,000 women continue to die of breast cancer each year. The only way to reduce this number is through utilizing preventative therapies.

Basic Cancer Prevention Strategies

    As mentioned above, many women are completely unaware that the science backing the use of mammograms is sorely lacking, and that more women are being harmed by regular mammograms than are saved by them. Many also do not realize that the “new and improved” 3D tomosynthesis mammogram actually delivers even MORE ionizing radiation than the older version. This is not a step forward...

    Please understand that there are other screening options, each with their own strengths and weaknesses, and you have a right to utilize those options. Also remember that in order to truly avoid breast cancer, you need to focus your attention on prevention.

    A few simple, yet great options to assist in your efforts to avoid breast cancer are: making sure you are getting enough vitamin D, K2 and iodine; that you utilize lymphatic massage; use stress management techniques, exercise often, and balance your hormones naturally. It is also wise to eat a Mediterranean diet consisting of organic foods. Avoid processed and GMO foods; and toxic environments.

    In my practice, I recommend breast thermography, even for young women to get a baseline, but also combine the imaging not only with a review of the findings, but more importantly, as a venue to educate women on breast health. It is far more effective to prevent breast cancer, than it is to wait until it is there and then treat it. We are all different so make sure you consult with your doctor and do your own research before utilizing any of these suggestions.

    The advice I give all of my patients is to be your own health advocate, do your own research and always ask questions before agreeing to any therapy or treatment, screening and/or procedure.

About the Author:

    Dr. Johnnie Ham, MD, former Lieutenant Colonel of the US Army Medical Corps, is the Medical Director of Coastal Prestige Medical Services, Pismo Beach, CA. Coastal Prestige Physicians offer top-notch comprehensive healthcare, with an emphasis on evidence-based primary care and preventive health for all ages.

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

How to Recognize the Plastics That are Hazardous to You!

                                      SPONSORS

 

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
                

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev

    Look around your home...take note

just how many plastic items arearound you.  From food containers and utensils
to bags, water bottles, showercurtains and children’s toys, plastic has become
a permanent fixture in oureveryday lives – but it’s one that comes with serious
consequences.

    Approximately 200 billion pounds (that’s 100 million tons) of plastic are
produced every year. Some now say we have entered the “Age of Plastics.” But
all of these plastic chemicals are now finding their way into your body and
the environment, where they are accumulating over time with potentially
catastrophic biological consequences.

Why You Should Check the Resin Identification Code

    It is possible to seriously cut back on the amount of plastic in your
life, which I strongly recommend and give tips for below. However, for the
plastics you do use it’s important to be aware of the risks they pose.

    This can be determined through a classification system called the Resin
Identification Code, which is the number printed on the bottom of most
plastic bottles and food containers. It describes what kind of plastic resin
the product is made out of.

    The featured article compiled a breakdown of what each Resin
Identification Code means, which you can use to help you make informed
decisions on your plastic usage. As you’ll read below, you should generally
avoid plastics labeled #7, #3 or #6, while those that may be somewhat safer
include #1, #2, #4 and #5.

Getting to Know Your Plastics: What the 7 Numbers Mean

    Plastic #1: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)

        Typically used to make bottles for soft drinks, water, juice,
mouthwash, sports drinks and containers for condiments like ketchup, salad
dressing, jelly and jam, PET is considered safe, but it can actually leach
the toxic metal antimony, which is used during its manufacture.

        One study that looked at 63 brands of bottled water produced in
Europe and Canada found concentrations of antimony that were more than 100
times the typical level found in clean groundwater (2 parts per trillion).

        It also found that the longer a bottle of water sits on a shelf -- in
a grocery store or your refrigerator -- the greater the dose of antimony
present. It is believed that the amount of antimony leeching from these PET
bottles differs based on exposure to sunlight, higher temperatures, and
varying pH levels.

        Brominated compounds have also been found to leach into PET bottles.

Bromine is known to act as a central nervous system depressant, and can
trigger a number of psychological symptoms such as acute paranoia and other
psychotic symptoms.

    Plastic #2: High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)

        HDPE, which is considered a low-hazard plastic, is often used for
milk, water and juice bottles, as well as bottles for cleaning supplies and
shampoo. It’s also used to make grocery bags and cereal box liners. HDPE
(like most plastics) has been found to release estrogenic chemicals.

        In one study, 95 percent of all plastic products tested were positive
for estrogenic activity, meaning they can potentially disrupt your hormones
and even alter the structure of human cells, posing risks to infants and
children. In this particular study, even products that claimed to be free of
the common plastic toxicant bisphenol-A (BPA) still tested positive for other
estrogenic chemicals.

    Plastic #3: Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)

        PVC plastic can be rigid or flexible, and is commonly found in bags
for bedding, shrink wrap, deli and meat wrap, plastic toys, table cloths and
blister packs used to store medications.

        PVC contains toxic chemicals including DEHP, a type of phthalate used
as a plastics softener. Phthalates are one of the groups of "gender-bending"
chemicals causing males of many species to become more female. These
chemicals have disrupted the endocrine systems of wildlife, causing
testicular cancer, genital deformations, low sperm counts and infertility in
a number of species, including polar bears, deer, whales and otters, just to
name a few.

        Scientists believe phthalates are responsible for a similar pattern
of adverse effects in humans as well. If your home contains soft, flexible
plastic flooring, such as vinyl or those padded play-mat floors for kids
(often used in day cares and kindergartens, too), there’s a good chance it is
also made from toxic PVC. PVC flooring has been linked to chronic diseases
including allergies, asthma and autism.

    Plastic #4: Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE)

        Another plastic that is considered a low hazard, LDPE is used in bags
for bread, newspapers, fresh produce, household garbage and frozen foods, as
well as in paper milk cartons and hot and cold beverage cups. While LDPE does
not contain BPA, it may pose risks of leaching estrogenic chemicals, similar
to HDPE.

    Plastic #5: Polypropylene (PP)

        PP plastic is used to make containers for yogurt, deli foods,
medications and takeout meals. While polypropylene is said to have a high
heat tolerance making it unlikely to leach chemicals, at least one study
found that PP plastic ware used for laboratory studies did leach at least two
chemicals.

    Plastic #6: Polystyrene (PS)

        Polystyrene, also known as Styrofoam, is used to make cups, plates,
bowls, take-out containers, meat trays and more. Polystyrene is known to
leach styrene,7 which can damage your nervous system and is linked to cancer,
into your food. Temperature has been found to play a role in how much styrene
leaches from polystyrene containers, which means using them for hot foods and
beverages (such as hot coffee in a polystyrene cup) may be worst of all.

    Plastic #7: Other

        This is a catch-all designation used to describe products made from
other plastic resins not described above, or those made from a combination of
plastics. It’s difficult to know for sure what types of toxins may be in
plastics, but there’s a good chance it often contains BPA or the new, equally
concerning chemical on the block in the bisphenol class known as Bisphenol-S
(BPS).

        BPA and BPS are endocrine disrupters, which means they mimic or
interfere with your body's hormones and "disrupts" your endocrine system. The
glands of your endocrine system and the hormones they release are
instrumental in regulating mood, growth and development, tissue function,
metabolism, as well as sexual function and reproductive processes.

        Some of the greatest concern surrounds early-life, in utero exposure
to bisphenol compounds, which can lead to chromosomal errors in your
developing fetus, causing spontaneous miscarriages and genetic damage. But
evidence is also very strong showing these chemicals are influencing adults
and children, too, and leading to decreased sperm quality, early puberty,
stimulation of mammary gland development, disrupted reproductive cycles and
ovarian dysfunction, cancer and heart disease, among numerous other health
problems.

        For instance, research has found that "higher BPA exposure is
associated with general and central obesity in the general adult population
of the United States," while another study found that BPA is associated not
only with generalized and abdominal obesity, but also with insulin
resistance, which is an underlying factor in many chronic diseases.

Plastics Pose a Great Risk to the Environment, Too

    Plastics are not only an issue in products while they’re being used but
also when they’re disposed of. While approximately 50 percent of plastic
waste goes to landfills (where it will sit for hundreds of years due to
limited oxygen and lack of microorganisms to break it down) the remaining 45
plus percent “disappears” into the environment where it ultimately washes out
to sea, damaging marine ecosystems and entering the food chain.

    Plastic particles are like “sponges” for waterborne contaminants such as
PCBs, pesticides like DDT, herbicides, PAHs, and other persistent organic
pollutants. This phenomenon makes plastics far from benign, and scientists
have yet to determine the full extent of the dangers posed by their
consumption or the effects higher up the food chain.

    One of the biggest environmental assaults is the massive accumulation of
plastic trash in each of the world’s five major oceanic gyres. Gyres are
large, slowly rotating oceanic whirlpools, driven by global winds and ocean
currents.10 Garbage and debris is funneled into the center of these gyres, in
a kind of toilet bowl effect or vortex.

    One of these gyres, the North Pacific Gyre, is in the middle of the
Pacific Ocean about a thousand miles from the Western coast. In its midst is
a huge mass of trash (90 percent plastics), which floats in a soup of smaller
pieces that have been broken apart by wave action.

    Some call it the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” and others the “Pacific
Trash Vortex,” but regardless of its name, it’s the largest “landfill” in the
world. In it you will find everything from plastic netting to bottles and
bags and buckets, paint rollers, hula-hoops and medical equipment. Most of
the garbage patch, however, is not made up of large items but rather
microplastics you can’t see with the naked eye, forming a sort of plastic
soup where pure seawater used to be. Filter-feeding marine animals ingest
these plastic particles, and the toxins they contain, and subsequently pass
them up through the food chain, and eventually to humans.

Tips for Cutting Down on Your Plastic Use

    If at all possible, seek to purchase products that are not made from or
    packaged in plastic. Here are a few ideas for doing so:

    Use reusable shopping bags for groceries.
    
    Bring your own mug for coffee.    

    Bring drinking water from home in glass water bottles, instead of
    buying bottled water.

    Store foods in the freezer in glass mason jars as opposed to plastic 
    bags.
   
    Take your own non-plastic container to restaurants for leftovers.

    Request no plastic wrap on your newspaper and dry cleaning.

    Avoid disposable utensils.    

    Buy foods in bulk when you can.    

    Replace your plastic kitchenware with glass or ceramic alternatives.

    Use stainless steel or high-heat-resistant nylon for utensils in lieu
    of plastics.      

    Since plastic is found widely in processed food packaging (this includes
canned foods and beverages, which typically have a plastic lining), modifying
your diet to include primarily fresh, whole foods that you purchase at a
farmer's market or food co-op will have the added benefit of helping you cut
down on exposure to plastic chemicals that are common in the food packages
sold at most supermarkets.

Thanks Dr. Mercola

 

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT)

                            SPONSORS

 

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
                   

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev

CLINIC TREATMENT: This treatment must be used at a clinic under the 

direction of cancer experts.

How It Works

Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT) is a true Stage IV alternative cancer
treatment. It uses a combination of two orthodox drugs - insulin (actually
insulin is also found in nature) and a chemotherapy drug. Cancer cells have
highly active insulin receptors.

With IPT the insulin works on the cell membranes and allows chemotherapy
to target cancer cells. Thus, it is the chemotherapy that kills the cancer cells,
however, because of the insulin, the amount of chemotherapy needed is
greatly reduced, meaning the side-effects of the chemotherapy are greatly
reduced. Thus, the chemotherapy is much more potent (thus the word:
potentiation), much less chemotherapy is needed, and far less side-effects
are experienced.

Insulin is truly a "magic bullet" cancer treatment, meaning it allows
chemotherapy to target cancer cells and results in far less side-effects.

Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT)

The word "potentiate" means that one substance (insulin) enhances the
effectiveness of another agent (chemotherapy) and thus far less of the second
agent (chemotherapy) is needed. This means far less side-effects, as well as
a more effective treatment, is the result of a potentiating substance.

    "Because of this favorable side effect profile, cycles of low-dose
chemotherapy with IPT may be done more frequently."
   
Not only is IPT more effective than normal chemotherapy, it can be
administered more frequenly, but with less side-effects.

Consider the following doses of chemotherapy required by orthodox medicine
versus IPT therapists (i.e. orthodox dose to IPT dose):

1) Cisplatin (150 mg to 15 mg)
2) 5-Fluorouracil (1,500 mg to 200 mg)
3) Cyclophosphamide (1,500 mg to 200 mg)
4) Methotrexate (60 mg to 10 mg)
5) Doxorubicin (100 mg to 10 mg)

    "In those undergoing treatment with IPT, an overall gentler experience
promotes their concurrent use of other important elements in a program of
comprehensive cancer care, which includes nutrition for immune system support
and mind-body medicine to encourage a healing consciousness.
   

Consider this rather long quote:

    "There are numerous conditions that affect the central nervous system,
including strokes (also called cerebrovascular accidents), transient ischemic
attacks, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig disease), and transverse myelitis, as well as
infections from Borrelia (Lyme disease), syphilis, herpes, HIV (human
immunodeficiency virus), and many other organisms. As seen from this list,
the treatment options for these diseases are very scarce. The primary reason
that treatments for these disorders are almost nonexistent is that most
medications do not adequately pass the blood-brain barrier.

    The blood-brain barrier retards the entry of many compounds into the
brain, including chemotherapeutic agents. Theoretically, if there was a way
to increase the transport of substances into the central nervous system and
through the barrier, the efficacy of treatment would be greatly enhanced."   
Thus, insulin helps chemotherapy get past the blood-brain barrier. It does a
lot of other things as well.

In the "old days" IPT therapy required the patient to be put into an "insulin
coma." During those days orthodox medicine was somewhat (but not very much)
justified in avoiding IPT. But today, if you find an IPT doctor who requires
you to be put into an insulin coma, find another doctor. It is no longer
necessary to be put into an insulin coma.

With their justification of an "insulin coma" now gone, orthodox medicine has
no excuse for not supporting IPT. It is faster working, far more effective and has
virtually zero side-effects. It's "true cure rate" is much, muchhigher than the "true
cure rate" of orthodox medicine of 3%.

But instead of supporting IPT, The AMA has stopped most orthodox doctors from
using IPT in most states. It is generally the state medical associationboards which
decide on whether some types of treatments can be used in theirstates, though the
FDA and AMA can overrule the state boards.

For example,the FDA shut down DMSO Potentiation Therapy in the United States.

The bottom line is that IPT can only be used in a small number of states.

Thank You R. Webster Kehr

 

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

For Those on Prescription Drugs!

                            SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
                   

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev

If you are on ANY prescription drugs,  

 

or even over-the-counter drugs, such as aspirin, you should check with your
pharmacist or doctor to see if there is apotential problem with using natural
foods or natural supplements with yourprescription drugs. A problem can occur:

1) when one substance negates another substance, or
2) when one substance interferes with another substance, or
3) when one substance enhances the effectiveness of another.

For example, enhancing a prescription or over-the-counter drug can be just as
dangerous as blocking their actions. It is impossible for this website to
keep track of all possible conflicts. This warning is especially important
for drugs that are being used as heart medications (such as hypertension
drugs), blood thinners or pain medications (to name but three categories).

Sometimes it is prescription drugs that interfere with alternative medicines.

There is one very rare situation where a conflict can be directly fatal,
the combination of tranquilizers with hydrazine sulphate.

If you are on a blood thinner, you should not take proteolytic enzymes as
part of your alternative cancer treatment. Proteolytic enzymes are also blood
thinners.

It is common when talking to a cancer treatment vendor to accidentally forget
to mention something. For example, if someone is talking to Larry of Essense
of Life and forgets to mention they are on a blood thinner, there could be
problems because his complete protocol (as well as most complete protocols)
include proteolytic enzymes (also called: pancreatic enzymes). This could
happen because the cancer patient, or their representative, didn't know it
was important and the vendor forgot to ask. However, it is likely part of the
instructions that come with the protocol.

The point is that a cancer patient, or their representative, should continue
to study and read even after the treatment begins. In my dealings with cancer
patients I have run into many cases where a dangerous supplement (for the
situation) was being used and no one knew about it. This is more likely to
happen when a patient, or their representative, designs the treatment. But it
can happen with any treatment.

If you are on blood pressure medication you need to buy your own blood
pressure monitor. Take your blood pressure at least twice a day. If your
blood pressure drops too low, quit taking your prescription drug for blood
pressure. Continue to monitor your blood pressure. Many alternative cancer
treatments contain supplements that lower blood pressure.

Many cancer patients are on more than a dozen prescription drugs. It is
difficult, if not impossible, to accurately transition from being on several
prescription drugs to a pure alternative cancer treatment.

Having said all of these things, let's be logical. 

If you are Stage IV, thechances of you surviving your cancer without alternative
cancer treatments isVIRTUALLY ZERO. If you take both prescription drugs and
alternative cancertreatments, you are in a paradoxical situation. Here are two of
the severalpossible options:

1) the combination can do severe damage and shorten your life or
2) the alternative cancer treatment can cure you.

Does it make sense to do the best you can at avoiding conflicts, but at the
same time make sure you are using an alternative cancer treatment strong
enough to maximize your chances of survival? The only hope you have of
surviving is with alternative cancer treatments. Do the best you can at
preventing conflicts, but stick with the potent alternative treatments.

I liken this to a person who is drowning in the middle of a large pond. A
person standing on the side of the pond knows they cannot swim to the person
in time to save them. The only thing available to the person to throw to the
drowning person is a large branch. But the person on the bank thinks about it
and says to himself: "If the large branch hits the person on the head it will
kill them." That may be true, but if the large branch is not thrown to the
person, the person will drown. Thus, the only possible way the person can be
saved is to throw the large branch.

Likewise, orthodox medicine cannot save a person's life after the cancer has
spread beyond what they can cut out. Thus, the only hope to save the person
is with alternative cancer treatments.

If You are Currently On Chemotherapy

Almost all alternative cancer treatments can be used by someone still on
chemotherapy. However, there are two alternative cancer treatments that are
very effective for those on chemotherapy. One of them is the Cesium Chloride
/ DMSO Protocol and the other is the Tony Isaacs Oleander Protocol.

Fortunately, both of these are Stage IV treatments and will be discussed
later in this article.

If You are Contemplating Chemotherapy

Many families of cancer patients insist the cancer patient be treated by a
medical doctor and that the medical doctor uses chemotherapy.

Fortunately, there is an alternative cancer treatment which fits this
description. Thus, both the family and the cancer patient can be made happy
at the same time.

In fact, the chemotherapy treatment, administered by an M.D., is a superb
treatment!! It is the Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT). It combines very
low doses of chemotherapy with insulin.

Be sure you do NOT tell the rest of your family it uses very low dose
chemotherapy (i.e. 1/10th the normal amount).

Why do they use very low doses of chemotherapy? The reason is that the
insulin opens up the cell membranes of cancer cells so that the chemotherapy
will target the cancer cells and leave the healthy cells alone. Because this
treatment allows chemotherapy to target cancer cells, very low doses of
chemotherapy are used and there are virtually zero side-effects. It uses
about 1/10th as much chemotherapy as a normal chemotherapy treatment, but
more importantly it allows the chemotherapy to target cancer cells, thus
eliminating side-effects.

The reason I mention this is because some families of a cancer patient insist
the person use a medical doctor and chemotherapy. Fine, use IPT. IPT is one
of the orthodox cancer treatments which can cure cancer. Orthodox medicine
does not allow its use in most states so you may have to do some traveling.

Article on Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT)will appear, 

here, as the next article.

There is an even better orthodox cancer treatment than IPT which uses
chemotherapy; but it is not allowed in any state. In fact, the last medical
doctor to use it was raided and shut down by the FDA.

Also, note that some of the German cancer clinics use hyperthermia with very
low doses of chemotherapy. They are another option for families which insist
on chemotherapy. A link to a list of clinics will be given later in this
article.

When To use Radiation and Surgery

Generally speaking, there is no reason for surgery, however, there are
situations where it is critical. These situations are generally when a tumor
is blocking, or potentially blocking, the flow of bile or an artery or the
flow of some other fluid. In these cases, surgery may be required. Follow the
advice of your medical doctors when key fluids in the body may be in danger
of being blocked. This includes the total blockage of the colon or stomach.

Do not depend on alternative cancer treatments to reverse inevitable 

blockage of key fluids.

Likewise, generally speaking, there is no justification for radiation. But
again, there are times when it is essential. These cases generally involve
inflammation and pressure in the brain.

When there is pressure inside the brain, it can literally slow down and
eventually block the heart from beating. Obviously, if the heart stops
beating, or slows down to the point it is dangerous, this can be fatal.

In these cases, medical doctors will normally give steroids and/or radiation
to reduce the swelling. Follow their advice.

Do not depend on alternative cancer treatments to reverse existing or
potential swelling and inflammation in the brain.

In fact, many alternative cancer treatments will increase swelling and
inflammation in the brain. Be very aware of this issue if you are dealing
with brain cancer. Any cancer patient with brain cancer should take their
heart rate at least twice a day - period!!

The good news is that there are alternative cancer treatments which will not
increase swelling and inflammation in the brain. Discussions on indiviudal
alternative cancer treatments will mention which ones do or do not cause
additional swelling and inflammation in the brain.

Thank You R. Webster Kehr

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com

Lethal Salmon Virus Found...

                          SPONSORS

         The Solution For Disease FREE Health...WHOLESALE.

                       http://bit.ly/RGNZ0i
                   

            New - Reverse Your Diabetes Today

                http://tinyurl.com/n8bygev


           Continued From Last Post

Lethal Salmon Virus Found in Every Region with Installed Salmon Farms

    Dr. Rick Rutledge, professor and fisheries statistician at Simon Fraser University worried about river inlet sockeye, which were also dwindling in numbers just like Fraser River sockeye. He discovered that the river inlet sockeye were infected with Infectious Salmon Anemia Virus (ISA), also known as salmon influenza. This highly lethal and much-feared virus has proliferated in every region across the globe where Atlantic salmon farms have been installed.

    First detected in Norway in 1984, infection spread to other countries via egg imports. In Chile, ISA wiped out 70 percent of the country’s salmon industry, at a cost of $2 billion. But Chile has no native salmon to decimate. British Columbia does... And contrary to Chile, the wild salmon of BC are absolutely critical to the ecosystem and residents of the area. The locals don’t just make money off these fish; it’s a main staple of their diet.

    According to Morton, at least 11 species of fish in the Fraser River have been found to be infected with European-strain ISA, yet the Canadian food inspection agency has aggressively refuted the findings, and even attacked the credibility of two of the most preeminent experts on ISA testing, who testified that positive results were found to the Cohen Commission.

    In fact, everyone who has spoken up about these salmon viruses, which can be traced back to salmon farms, has been shut down in some way or another. And by muzzling scientists like Dr. Miller, the Canadian government has effectively put the entire BC ecosystem at grave risk, just to protect commercial fish farming and international trade. In so doing, they’re also allowing potentially contaminated farm-raised salmon to be sold, exported, and consumed.

You May Be Buying Salmon Infected with Dangerous Fish Viruses

    Morton tested farmed salmon purchased in various stores and sushi restaurants around British Columbia, and samples tested positive for at least three different salmon viruses, including:

        Infectious Salmon Anemia Virus (ISA)
        Salmon alphaviruses
        Piscine reovirus, which gives salmon a heart attack and prevents them from swimming upriver

    The problem with this, aside from the unknown effects on human health from eating salmon with lethal fish viruses, is that viruses are preserved by cold, and fish are always kept frozen for freshness. Then, when you wash the fish, the viruses get flushed down the drain and depending on your sewer system, could be introduced into local watersheds. The environmental impact of this viral contamination is hitherto unknown, but it’s unlikely to be completely harmless.

    “This is why it must become public,” Morton says. She insists that consumers, stores and trading partners must become aware of this problem, and be the ones to insist on proper testing and remedial action. It’s not just about protecting certain species of fish, it’s about the health of the ecosystem as a whole; it’s about human health and food safety as well.

    How can you tell whether a salmon is wild or farm raised? As explained by Morton, the flesh of wild sockeye salmon is bright red, courtesy of its natural astaxanthin content. It’s also very lean, so the fat marks, those white stripes you see in the meat, are very thin. If the fish is pale pink with wide fat marks, the salmon is farmed.

Farmed Fish Pose a Number of Health Hazards to Your Health

    Farm raised fish of all species can spell disaster for your health in a number of ways. It's important to understand that ALL farm-raised fish – not just salmon -- are fed a concoction of vitamins, antibiotics, and depending on the fish, synthetic pigments, to make up for the lack of natural flesh coloration due to the altered diet. Without it, the flesh of caged salmon, for example, would be an unappetizing, pale gray. The fish are also fed pesticides, along with compounds such as toxic copper sulfate, which is frequently used to keep nets free of algae.

    Not only do you ingest these drugs and chemicals when you eat the fish, but these toxins also build up in sea-floor sediments. In this way, industrial fish farming raises many of the same environmental concerns about chemicals and pollutants that are associated with feedlot cattle and factory chicken farms. In addition, fish waste and uneaten feed further litter the sea floor beneath these farms, generating bacteria that consume oxygen vital to shellfish and other bottom-dwelling sea creatures.

    Studies have also consistently found levels of PCBs, dioxins, toxaphene and dieldrin, as well as mercury, to be higher in farm-raised fish than wild fish. This fact alone would be cause to reconsider consuming farmed fish!

    Wild caught fish have already reached such toxic levels, it's risky to recommend eating them with a clear conscience. For example, according to a US Geological Survey study, mercury contamination was detected in EVERY fish sampled in nearly 300 streams across the United States. More than a quarter of these fish contained mercury at levels exceeding the EPA criterion for the protection of human health. So, when you consider the fact that factory farmed fish typically are even MORE toxic than wild-caught fish and also contain an assortment of antibiotics and pesticides, avoiding them becomes a no-brainer – at least if you're concerned about your health.

    To learn more about the differences between farmed salmon and wild salmon, specifically, please see my interview with Randy Hartnell, founder-president of Vital Choice Wild Seafood and Organics. I'm a huge fan of their wild sockeye salmon, and beside a fish dinner at a restaurant here or there, Vital Choice salmon is about the only type of fish I eat.

Buying Local Increases Food Safety and Food Security

    Morton recommends buying local foods and wild fish. I couldn’t agree more. As mentioned in the film, disease in farm animals is one of the biggest sources of epidemics in humans. Therefore, the health of food animals cannot be treated as some sort of idealistic notion relegated to tree-huggers and animal-welfare crusaders.

    Fish farms are the aquatic version of a confined animal feeding operation (CAFO), and just like their land-based cattle- and chicken farms, aquatic CAFO’s are a breeding ground for disease and toxic waste, and produce food animals of inferior quality. Due to the dramatically increased disease risk—a natural side effect of crowding—these animals are further contaminated with drugs, and in the case of salmon, synthetic astaxanthin, which is made from petrochemicals that are not approved for human consumption.

    Wild salmon are dying from diseases cultivated and spread by salmon farms. Where is the sense in this? And instead of selling wholesome, nutritionally-superior wild salmon, Canada is selling inferior and potentially diseased salmon raised in fish farms. Who benefits, and who loses?

    The industry will tell you the world needs inexpensive food, and inevitably, they insist that such foods can only be created using the latest technology and artificial means. The latest example of this craziness is the creation of what amounts to a vegetarian fish diet designed for carnivorous fish.2 Instead of fishmeal, the protein in this feed comes from bacteria, yeast or algae instead. This way, fish farms will not need to use valuable wild fish to feed farmed fish, and this, they claim, will help alleviate world hunger... Never mind the fact that by altering a fish’s diet in such a drastic way, you’re undoubtedly altering its nutritional content as well.

    So at what cost should we clamor for cheap foods? At the expense of our environment and, potentially, the very lives of our descendants? We cannot be so blindly arrogant as to think that we can survive as a species if we allow the ecosystem to fall apart.

    The ramifications of our large-scale, mass-producing, chemical-dependent food system are incredibly vast, which is why I urge you to become more curious about your food. Where, and how was it raised, grown, or manufactured? These things do matter; for your health, and the health and future of our planet.

    Like Morton, I am also very concerned about our vanishing freedoms and increasing “corpotocracy,” where citizens are ruled by multi-national corporations with just one goal in mind: Maximizing Profit. A glaring example of this loss of freedom was Bill 37—the inappropriately named “Animal Health Act” which, had Canada made it into law, would have made it a crime to report farm animal disease to the public. Under this bill, informants would face a $75,000 fine and two years in prison simply for naming the location of a disease outbreak. Fortunately, the Act was dropped, but could potentially be revived sometime in the future...

Thank You Dr. Mercola

God Bless Everyone & God Bless The United States of America.

Larry Nelson
42 S. Sherwood Dr.
Belton, Tx. 76513
cancercurehere@gmail.com